What is 1047.04 divided by 16

Answer:

(-15)

Step-by-step explanation:

(-7) - 8 = (-15) (Range is the difference between Max and Min Value)

please follow me and mark as brainliest

Answer:

7 + 9x

Step-by-step explanation:

add 5 and 2 and 9x doesn't have a like term so it stays the same

Answer:

9x + 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Like terms are terms that have the same variables and powers. Here, for 9x, there is no other term that is multiplied by x. So, the only terms we can combine is 2 and 5 which leaves us with 9x+7.

Answer:

LOL UGH THAT KEEPS HAPPENING TO ME

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

try reloading the page or check your internet

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

More formally, statistical power is the probability of finding a statistically significant result, given that there really is a difference (or effect) in the population. ... So, larger sample sizes give more reliable results with greater precision and power, but they also cost more time and money.

Answer:

1.24

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 37

Step-by-step explanation:

4x + 3 + x - 8 = 180

4x + x - 8 + 3 = 180

5x - 5 = 180

5x = 185

x = 37

Hope this helps!

The required simplified product is 3/2.

Given that fractions  3/8 ÷ 1/4.

To divide two fractions by multiplying the first fraction with the reciprocal of the second fraction.

Let a, b, c and d be any real numbers. Consider a/b ÷ c/d that gives

[tex]\frac{a}{b}[/tex]  ÷  [tex]\frac{c}{d}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{a}{b}[/tex] ×  [tex]\frac{c}{d}[/tex].

That implies, [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex]  ÷  [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{8}[/tex] ×  [tex]\frac{4}{1}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex].

Hence, the required simplified product is 3/2.

Learn more about simplification of fraction, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/16510095

#SPJ6

The expression using exponents we can rewrite as [tex]a^2 . c^2[/tex] .

To learn more about   exponent refer,

https://brainly.com/question/847241

#SPJ2

Answer:

[tex](-5,\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Midpoint Formula: [tex](\frac{x_1+x_2}{2},\frac{y_1+y_2}{2} )[/tex]

Simply plug in your coordinates into the midpoint formula to find midpoint:

R(-2, 3)

S(-8, -2)

[tex](\frac{-2+-8}{2},\frac{3+-2}{2} )[/tex]

[tex](\frac{-10}{2},\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

[tex](-5,\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

Answer:

sumthing that we hate doing

Step-by-step explanation:ughhhhhhhhhh

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The audience per dollar is ...

  Newspaper: 1000/$200 = 5/$

  Radio: 800/$100 = 8/$

  TV: 14000/$800 = 17.5/$

So, TV gives the greatest exposure. As much of the budget as possible should be spent on TV ads. That amount is the lesser of $6000 and ...

  (7 ads)($800/ad) = $5600

With $5600 spent on TV ads, the remaining advertising budget is ...

  $6000 -5600 = $400

The next most cost-effective medium is radio. The remaining $400 budget allows for ...

  $400/($100/ad) = 4 ads

__

To maximize exposure, the advertising budget should be spent this way:

Answer:

he need 84

Step-by-step explanation:

12* 7

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

please mark me brainliesttt

Answer:

38 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the perimeter:

12 + 7 + 12 + 7 = 24 + 14 = 38 feet of fencing

Answer:

x=½, -2

x= 0.5, -2

possibly im not perfect

Complete Question

Researchers investigated whether the proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss was different in 2005–2006 than in 1988–1994. They collected data on random samples of American teenagers in those two time periods. Let the symbol [tex]\pi __{05-06}}[/tex] denote the population proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss in 2005–2006 and similarly for [tex]\pi__{{88-94}}[/tex]. A 95% confidence interval for the parameter [tex]\pi__{{05-06}} }- \pi__{{88-94}}[/tex] turns out to be (0.0015, 0.0467).

Required:

What is an appropriate conclusion to draw?

Answer:

The appropriate conclusion is  

The sample data provide little evidence to doubt that the proportion of American teenagers with hearing loss was the same in 1988-1994 as in 2005-2006

Step-by-step explanation:

Generally the appropriate conclusion is

The sample data provide little evidence to doubt that the proportion of American teenagers with hearing loss was the same in 1988-1994 as in 2005-2006.

This because the confidence intervals are very close to zero , i.e both the upper limit and the lower limit are close to zero  and if we are take 0.05 as our level of significance we see that the both values of the confidence level are small to be significant

Answer:

1) 20

Step-by-step explanation:

40% percent of this number is only a small amount.

20

Step-by-step explanation:

40 percent of this number is a small amount

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope= -3/1

plot from point  (-2,4)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Just so that we have something to work with, the length of the longest day (June 22) in Acron Ohio is 15 hours 8 minutes and 9 seconds on the 20th of June of this year. The number we get won't be this accurate, but it will tell us if we have done it correctly. The tricky part is when to use the radians.

cos(0.1309 H) = -0.4336 tan (40o 46 minutes)  I have assumed this is in radians. It won't work any other way. The measurement cannot be in degrees which will give a negative tan from the minus sign out in front. The cos being minus will make things even worse.

cos(0.1309 H) = -0.4336 tan (40 46/60  )

cos(0.1309 H) = -0.4336 tan (40.766666667)

cos(0.1309 H) = -0.4336 * -0.074173405

cos(0.1309 H) = 0.032161588

0.1309 H = cos-1(0.032161588)

0.1309 H =  1.538629191

H = 1.538629191 / 0.1309

H = 11.754 which is no where near 15 hours, but it is what the numbers give.

I would suggest that you go to your instructor for the other two. Work this one out until you get somewhere near 11.7 hours.

The other two cities should come to something near  this answer.  

Answer:

AB is 13

Step-by-step explanation

Answer:

Between x = 48 and x = 45.

Step-by-step explanation:

Average rate of change of a function in the given interval is represented by,

Average rate of change = [tex]\frac{\triangle y}{\triangle x}[/tex]

From the table attached,

Average rate of change of the function between x = 3 and x = 9

= [tex]\frac{16-7}{9-3}[/tex]

= 3

Average rate of change in the interval x = 9 and x = 22

= [tex]\frac{32-16}{22-9}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{16}{13}[/tex]

= 1.23

Average rate of change in the interval x = 9 and x = 22,

= [tex]\frac{45-32}{45-22}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{13}{23}[/tex]

= 0.57

Average rate of change in the interval x = 45 and x = 48,

= [tex]\frac{63-45}{48-45}[/tex]

= 6

Therefore, average rate of change is maximum between x = 45 and 48.

Option given in bottom right will be the answer.

Answer:

28 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

It says that $42 was 1/3 of her total. So you multiply $42 by 3 and you get $126. You now divide $126 by her weekly allowance, $4.5, and the answer is 28.

1. $42 x 3 = $126

2. $126/$4.5 = 28

3. The answer is Sharon has been saving her allowance for 28 weeks.

Hope this helps!

-Jerc

Answer:

She has been saving her money up for 28 weeks.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. If 42 is 1/3 of her money, then you would multiply 42 by 3 to get the full 3/3 so: 42•3=126

2. Next, you would divide $126 by $4.50 because that is the total amount of money divided by how much she saved up each week, so: 126/4.5=28 and that gives us the answer which is 28.

Complete question :

Find the standard deviation of the following data. Round your answer to one decimal place.

X: 0 1 2 3 4 5

P(X) : 0.2, 0.3, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.2

Answer:

1.833

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data :

X: 0 1 2 3 4 5

P(X) : 0.2, 0.3, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.2

Standard deviation (s) = Sqrt[Σx²*f(x) - E(x)²]

E(x) = (0*0.2) + (1*0.3)+(2*0.1)+(3*0.1) + (4*0.1) + (5 * 0.2) = 2.2

Sqrt[Σx²*f(x) - E(x)²]: [(0^2 * 0.2)+(1^2 * 0.3)+(2^2 * 0.1)+(3^2 * 0.1) + (4^2 * 0.1) + (5^2 * 0.2)] - 2.2²

Sqrt(8.2 - 4.84) = 1.833

Answer:

The correct option is  

Option A and Option C

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The sample size of paired men is  [tex]n_p   =  11[/tex]

   The test statistics is  t≈1.971

    The  significance level is  α=0.05

    The rejection region is  t<−2.228 and t>2.228

    The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o :\mu_ d=0[/tex]

     The alternative hypothesis  is  [tex]H_a :\mu_ d \ne 0[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

        [tex]df  =  n_1 +  n_2 - 2[/tex]

Here [tex]n_1[/tex] is the sample size of  father which is  [tex]n_1 =  11[/tex]

        [tex]n_2[/tex] is the sample size of males who are at least 18 years old  which is  [tex]n_2 =  11[/tex]

So

     [tex]df  =  11 +  11 - 2[/tex]

=>   [tex]df  =  20[/tex]

Generally the critical values of  α=0.05 from the  t- distribution table at a degree of freedom of  [tex]df  =  20[/tex]  for a two -tailed test  is  

     [tex]t_{0.05 , 20 } =  \pm 2.08596345  [/tex]

From the value  obtained we see that the critical value  is within the region of rejection hence

 The decision rule is

Reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is  

  The conclusion of the hypothesis test is that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the heights of males between generations are different.