Which of the plotted points is in the second quadrant

The calculated value of the LCM of 79 and 81 is 6399

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Numbers = 79 and 81

The numbers 79 and 81 do not have any common factor

This means that we multipy them to get the LCM

So, we have

LCM = 79 * 81

Evaluate

LCM = 6399

Hence, the LCM is 6399

Read LCM at

https://brainly.com/question/10749076

#SPJ1

Once you do find a match, or several matches, the smallest of these matches would be the Least Common Multiple. For instance, the first matching multiple(s) of 81 and 79 are 6399, 12798, 19197. Because 6399 is the smallest, it is the least common multiple. The LCM of 81 and 79 is 6399.

The volume of ornament B is 125 times larger than the volume of ornament A.

In Geometry and Mathematics, a scale factor simply refers to the ratio of two corresponding side lengths in two similar geometric figures such as pentagons, which can be used to either horizontally or vertically enlarge (increase) or reduce (decrease or compress) a function that represents their size.

In Geometry, the scale factor of the dimensions of a geometric figure can be calculated by using the following formula:

Scale factor of volume = (Scale factor of dimensions)³

Scale factor of volume = (5)³

Scale factor of volume = 125

Read more on scale factor here: brainly.com/question/29967135

#SPJ1

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

The probabilities of the three events are:

P(sum < 6) = 1/2

P(sum = 11) = 1/18

P(sum > 8) = 1/3

We have,

There are 6 possible outcomes for the spinner and 6 possible outcomes for the number cube, so there are 6 x 6 = 36 equally likely outcomes in total.

The sum will be less than 6 if Michelle rolls a 1, 2, or 3 on the number cube, regardless of the result of the spinner.

There are 3 possible outcomes for the number cube and 6 possible outcomes for the spinner, so there are 3 x 6 = 18 outcomes where the sum is less than 6.

Therefore, the probability that the sum will be less than 6 is:

= P(sum < 6)

= 18/36

= 1/2

The sum will be equal to 11 if Michelle rolls a 5 or 6 on the spinner and a 6 on the number cube. There are 2 possible outcomes for the spinner and 1 possible outcome for the number cube, so there are 2 x 1 = 2 outcomes where the sum is equal to 11.

Therefore, the probability that the sum will be equal to 11 is:

= P(sum = 11)

= 2/36

= 1/18

The sum will be greater than 8 if Michelle rolls a 3, 4, 5, or 6 on the spinner and a 4, 5, or 6 on the number cube.

There are 4 possible outcomes for the spinner and 3 possible outcomes for the number cube, so there are 4 x 3 = 12 outcomes where the sum is greater than 8.

Therefore, the probability that the sum will be greater than 8 is:

= P(sum > 8)

= 12/36

= 1/3

Therefore,

The probabilities of the three events are:

P(sum < 6) = 1/2

P(sum = 11) = 1/18

P(sum > 8) = 1/3

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/14099682

#SPJ1

The price when x = 12 is 80 dollars.

The elasticity of demand, according to the given conditions,  when x = 12 is 0.0625

To compute the price, p, when x = 12, we plug in x = 12 into the demand function P = 5(x + 4) "4:

P = 5(12 + 4) "4
P = 80

So the price when x = 12 is 80 dollars.

To compute the rate of change of demand with respect to price, p, we use implicit differentiation. Differentiating both sides of the demand function P = 5(x + 4) "4 with respect to p, we get:

dP/dp = 5(dx/dp)

Solving for dx/dp, we get:

dx/dp = (dP/dp) / 5

We know that dP/dx = 5, since that is the coefficient of x in the demand function. So when x = 12, we have:

dP/dx = 5
dP/dp = (dP/dx)(dx/dp) = 5(dx/dp)

Substituting in dP/dp = -15 (since we want the rate of change of demand with respect to price, not quantity), we get:

-15 = 5(dx/dp)
dx/dp = -3

So the rate of change of demand with respect to price, when x = 12, is -3 thousand units per dollar.

To compute the elasticity of demand when x = 12, we use the formula:

Elasticity of Demand = (% change in quantity demanded) / (% change in price)

We can find the % change in quantity demanded by using the derivative of the demand function. We have:

P = 5(x + 4) "4
dP/dx = 5
dP/dx = 5(x + 4)"5(dx/dx) = 5(12 + 4)"5(dx/dx)
dx/dx = (dP/dx) / (5(x + 4)"5) = 1 / (x + 4)"5

So when x = 12, we have:

dx/dx = 1 / (12 + 4)"5 = 1/16

This means that a 1% increase in quantity demanded corresponds to a 1/16% increase in x. Similarly, a 1% decrease in quantity demanded corresponds to a 1/16% decrease in x.

To find the % change in price, we can use the fact that the demand function is:

P = 5(x + 4) "4

This means that a 1% increase in price corresponds to a 1% increase in P, since there are no other variables involved in the equation. Similarly, a 1% decrease in price corresponds to a 1% decrease in P.

So we have:

% change in quantity demanded = 1/16%
% change in price = 1%

Plugging these into the formula for elasticity of demand, we get:

Elasticity of Demand = (% change in quantity demanded) / (% change in price)
Elasticity of Demand = (1/16%) / (1%)
Elasticity of Demand = 1/16

So the elasticity of demand when x = 12 is 1/16 or 0.0625.

To learn more about elasticity of demand visit : https://brainly.com/question/1048608

#SPJ11

The cylindrical mailing tube of greatest volume that can be mailed using the US Postal Service has a radius of 12 inches, a length of 36 inches, and a volume of approximately 16,190 cubic inches.

In Exercise 23, we were given the following information:

The mailing tube must have a length of 48 inches or less.

The total combined length and girth (circumference) of the mailing tube cannot exceed 108 inches.

Let's assume that the mailing tube is a cylinder with radius r and length h. The cylinder's volume is then determined by:

[tex]V = πr^2h[/tex]

We want to find the dimensions of the cylinder that will maximize its volume, subject to the constraints given. To tackle this issue, we can employ the Lagrange multiplier approach.

The Lagrangian function for this problem is:

[tex]L(r, h, λ) = πr^2h + λ(108 - 2πr - 2h) + μ(48 - h)[/tex]

where λ and μ are Lagrange multipliers.

We take the partial derivatives of L with respect to r, h, and and set them to zero in order to determine the critical points of L:

∂F/∂r = 2πrL - 2μ = 0

∂F/∂L = πr^2 - λ - 2μ = 0

∂F/∂λ = 46 - L = 0

∂F/∂μ = 108 - 2r - 2L = 0

Solving these equations simultaneously, we get:

r = h/π

μ = πh/2 - λ

r = (54 - h/π)/π

Substituting r and λ in terms of h into the equation for ∂L/∂h and solving for h, we get:

h = 36 inches

Substituting this value of h into the equations for r and λ, we get:

r = 12 inches

λ = 9π

Therefore, the largest cylindrical postal tube that may be sent by the US Postal Service has a radius of 12 inches, a length of 36 inches, and a capacity of around 16,190 cubic inches.

Visit here to know more about Lagrangian function:

brainly.com/question/31367466

#SPJ4

The complete question is -

Refer to exercise 23. Find the dimensions of the cylindrical mailing tube of greatest volume that may be mailed using the us postal service.

A package to be mailed using the US postal service may not measure more than 108 inches in length plus girth. (Length is the longest dimension and girth is the largest distance around the package, perpendicular to the length.) Find the dimensions of the rectangular box with square base of greatest volume that may be mailed?

The volume of the triangular prism is given as follows:

V = 88.13 cm³.

The volume of a triangular prism is given as half the multiplication of the dimensions of the triangle, as follows:

V = 0.5 x l x w x h.

The dimensions of the triangle in this problem are given as follows:

3 cm, 5 cm and 11.75 cm.

Hence the volume of the prism is given as follows:

V = 0.5 x 3 x 5 x 11.75

V = 88.13 cm³.

More can be learned about the volume of a triangular prism at https://brainly.com/question/29663752

#SPJ1

If you provide more values than the size of the array, you'll get a compilation error.

In C or C++ programming languages, an array can be declared, created, and initialized in a single statement. Here's how you can declare, create, and initialize an array named a of 10 elements of type int with the values of the elements (starting with the first) set to 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100, respectively:

int a[10] = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100};

This statement does the following:

Declares an array named a of 10 elements of type int.

Initializes the elements of the array with the specified values in the curly braces, starting from the first element.

Note that if you don't provide enough values in the curly braces, the remaining elements will be initialized to 0. If you provide more values than the size of the array, you'll get a compilation error.

To learn more about compilation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27882492

#SPJ11

The maximum occurs at x ≈ 2.2143, the inflection point occurs at x = π, and there are no local minima in the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ 2π.

To find the maximum, minimum, and inflection points for the function y = 5 sin x + 3x, we need to take the derivative of the function and set it equal to zero to find the critical points.

y = 5 sin x + 3x

y' = 5 cos x + 3

Setting y' equal to zero, we get:

5 cos x + 3 = 0

cos x = -3/5

x = arccos(-3/5) ≈ 2.2143

This is the only critical point in the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ 2π.

To determine if this critical point is a maximum or minimum, we can use the second derivative test. Taking the second derivative of y, we get:

y'' = -5 sin x

At x = arccos(-3/5), y'' = -5 sin(arccos(-3/5)) ≈ -4.4721

Since y'' is negative at x = arccos(-3/5), this critical point is a local maximum.

To find the inflection points, we need to find where the concavity changes. This occurs when y'' = 0 or is undefined. Since y'' is never equal to zero, the only possibility is that y'' is undefined. This occurs when sin x = 0, which happens at x = kπ for any integer k. However, we are only interested in the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ 2π, so we only need to check the values k = 0, 1, and 2.

At x = 0 and x = 2π, y'' = -5 sin(0) = 0, which means that the concavity does not change at these points.

At x = π, y'' = -5 sin(π) = 0, which means that the concavity changes at this point. Therefore, x = π is an inflection point.

In summary, the maximum occurs at x ≈ 2.2143, the inflection point occurs at x = π, and there are no local minima in the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ 2π.

To learn more about interval visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13708942

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the error is less than [tex]$\$ 0.015 \$$[/tex], which is our final exact answer.

We can use the Mean Value Theorem to estimate the error in approximating [tex]$(128.012)^{\frac{6}{7}}$[/tex] by [tex]$128^{\frac{6}{7}}$[/tex]. Let [tex]$f(x) = x^{\frac{6}{7}}$[/tex] and [tex]$a = 128.012$[/tex]. Then, by the Mean Value Theorem, there exists some [tex]$c$[/tex] between [tex]$a$[/tex] and [tex]$128$[/tex] such that:

[tex]$$\frac{f(a)-f(128)}{a-128}=f^{\prime}(c)$$[/tex]

Taking the absolute value of both sides and rearranging, we get:

[tex]$$|f(a)-f(128)|=|a-128| \cdot\left|f^{\prime}(c)\right|$$[/tex]

Now, we can find [tex]$\$ f^{\prime}(x) \$$[/tex] :

[tex]$$f(x)=x^{\frac{6}{7}}=e^{\frac{6}{7} \ln x}$$[/tex]

Using the chain rule, we get:

[tex]$$f^{\prime}(x)=\frac{6}{7} x^{-\frac{1}{7}} e^{\frac{6}{7} \ln x}=\frac{6}{7} x^{-\frac{1}{7}} f(x)$$[/tex]

Plugging in [tex]$\$ \mathrm{c} \$$[/tex] and simplifying, we get:

[tex]$$|f(a)-f(128)|=|128.012-128| \cdot\left|\frac{6}{7} c^{-\frac{1}{7}}\left(\frac{128.012}{c}\right)^{\frac{6}{7}}\right|$$[/tex]

We want to find an upper bound for this expression, so we will use the fact that [tex]$\$ c \$$[/tex] is between [tex]$\$ 128 \$$[/tex] and [tex]$\$ 128.012 \$$[/tex]. Therefore, we have:

[tex]$$|f(a)-f(128)| < 0.012 \cdot \frac{6}{7} 128^{-\frac{1}{7}}(128.012)^{\frac{6}{7}}$$[/tex]

Plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]$$|f(a)-f(128)| < 0.012 \cdot \frac{6}{7} \cdot 128^{-\frac{1}{7}}(128.012)^{\frac{6}{7}} \approx 0.015$$[/tex]

Therefore, the magnitude of the error is less than [tex]$\$ 0.015 \$$[/tex], which is our final exact answer.

To learn more about  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15681399

#SPJ11

The likelihood of producing metal bars with lengths significantly longer than the mean length of 11 cm.

(a) Using the standard normal distribution, we have:

z = (10.5 - 11) / 0.25 = -2

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the probability of a randomly selected cylindrical metal bar having a length longer than 10.5 cm is approximately 0.9772.

(b) Using the standard normal distribution, we have:

P(X > K) = 0.14

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the corresponding z-score is approximately 1.08. Therefore,

1.08 = (K - 11) / 0.25

Solving for K, we get:

K = 11.27 cm

(c) Let X be the length of a cylindrical metal bar in cm. Then, the production cost Y is given by:

Y = 80X + 100

The mean of Y is:

μY = E(Y) = E(80X + 100) = 80E(X) + 100 = 80(11) + 100 = 980

The median of Y is approximately equal to the mean, since the distribution is approximately symmetric.

The variance of Y is:

σY^2 = Var(Y) = Var(80X + 100) = 80^2 Var(X) = 80^2 (0.25)^2 = 40

The standard deviation of Y is:

σY = sqrt(Var(Y)) = sqrt(400) = 20

The 86th percentile of Y can be found using a standard normal distribution table or calculator:

P(Z < z) = 0.86

z = invNorm(0.86) ≈ 1.08

Solving for Y, we get:

Y = 80X + 100 = 80(11 + 1.08) + 100 ≈ $1064.40

(d) The production cost of a metal bar has a mean of $980, a median of approximately $980, a variance of $400, a standard deviation of $20, and an 86th percentile of approximately $1064.40.

(e) The process standard deviation should be adjusted to a lower level than 0.25 cm to minimize the chance of the production cost of a metal bar to be more expensive than $1000. This is because a lower standard deviation indicates that the production process is more consistent, which reduces the likelihood of producing metal bars with lengths significantly longer than the mean length of 11 cm.

To learn more about standard visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15287326

#SPJ11

P(pick urn 2 | ball labeled 3) = (1/2) * (4/5) / (4/15) = 3/4

a) The probability of picking a ball labeled 2 can be computed using the law of total probability:

P(pick ball labeled 2) = P(pick urn 1) * P(pick ball labeled 2 from urn 1) + P(pick urn 2) * P(pick ball labeled 2 from urn 2)

= (1/5) * (1/3) + (4/5) * (1/4)

= 1/15 + 1/5

= 4/15

b) Using Bayes' theorem, the probability that the ball came from the second urn given that it is labeled 3 is:

P(pick urn 2 | ball labeled 3) = P(ball labeled 3 | pick urn 2) * P(pick urn 2) / P(ball labeled 3)

We know that P(pick urn 2) = 4/5, P(ball labeled 3 | pick urn 2) = 1/2, and we can compute the denominator as follows:

P(ball labeled 3) = P(pick urn 1) * P(ball labeled 3 from urn 1) + P(pick urn 2) * P(ball labeled 3 from urn 2)

= (1/5) * (1/3) + (4/5) * (1/4)

= 1/15 + 1/5

= 4/15

Therefore,

P(pick urn 2 | ball labeled 3) = (1/2) * (4/5) / (4/15) = 3/4

To learn more about denominator visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7067665

#SPJ11

Based on the results of the goodness-of-fit test, if the p-value is less than 0.05, we should reject the claim that the distribution of home provinces/territories of alpine skiers is the same as the distribution of home provinces/territories of freestyle skiers at the 5% significance level.

To compare the distributions of home provinces/territories for alpine skiers and freestyle skiers, a goodness-of-fit test can be used. This test compares observed frequencies (i.e., the actual counts of skiers from each province/territory) with expected frequencies (i.e., the counts of skiers that would be expected if the distributions were the same).

However, it is important to note that two of the expected frequencies are less than 5, which violates the assumption of expected frequencies being greater than or equal to 5 for some commonly used goodness-of-fit tests, such as the chi-squared test. Despite this violation, we can still proceed with the test, but the results should be interpreted with caution.

The null hypothesis (H0) for the goodness-of-fit test is that the distributions of home provinces/territories are the same for alpine skiers and freestyle skiers. The alternative hypothesis (H1) is that the distributions are different.

The test is conducted at the 5% significance level, which means that we are willing to accept a 5% chance of making a Type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis). If the p-value obtained from the goodness-of-fit test is less than 0.05, we would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the distributions of home provinces/territories are significantly different for alpine skiers and freestyle skiers.

Therefore, based on the results of the goodness-of-fit test, if the p-value is less than 0.05, we should reject the claim that the distribution of home provinces/territories of alpine skiers is the same as the distribution of home provinces/territories of freestyle skiers at the 5% significance level.

To learn more about p-value here:

brainly.com/question/30078820#

#SPJ11

SSS (Side-Side-Side) Postulate: Two triangles are congruent if the three sides of one triangle are equal to the three corresponding sides of the other triangle.

SAS (Side-Angle-Side) Postulate: Two triangles are congruent if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are equal to the two corresponding sides and included angle of the other triangle.

To use the SSS or SAS postulate, you must show that all three corresponding sides or two sides and the included angle are equal, respectively. When you have proved that the two triangles are congruent, you can use the congruence statements and CPCTC (Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent) to prove other properties of the triangles.

Learn more about triangles

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ4

The magazine contacted a simple random sample of 400 current​ subscribers, and 126 of those surveyed expressed interest in, next
The magazine should go ahead with the launch of an online edition.

To create a decision on whether to dispatch an internet version, the magazine should test the event that the extent of current supporters who would be fascinated by subscribing to the online version is more than 25% or not.

Let p be the genuine extent of current supporters who would subscribe to the online version.

The invalid speculation is that p = 0.25, and the elective theory is that

p > 0.25.

Ready to utilize a one-sample extent test to test this theory.

The test measurement is:

z = (P- p) / √(p*(1-p) / n)

where P is the test extent, n is the test measure, and p is the hypothesized extent.

In this case, p = 0.25, n = 400, and P = 126/400 = 0.315.

Stopping these values into the equation gives:

z = (0.315 - 0.25) / √(0.25*(1-0.25) / 400) = 3.36

Expecting a noteworthiness level of 0.05, the basic esteem of z for a one-tailed test is 1.645.

Since our calculated value of z (3.36) is more prominent than the basic esteem of z (1.645), able to reject the invalid theory and conclude that there is adequate proof to propose that more than 25% of current endorsers would be fascinated by subscribing to the online version.

Subsequently, the magazine ought to go ahead with the dispatch of a web version. 

To know more about random sampling refers to this :

https://brainly.com/question/29444380

#SPJ4

The expected value of the number of rejected items per day is 2.7.

The variance and standard deviation of rejected items per day are 0.107 and 0.327, respectively.

a) The completed probability mass function (PMF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) tables are as follows:

X f(x) F(x)

0 0 0

1 1/20 1/20

2 0.05 3/40

3 7/20 1/2

4 0.1 9/20

5 4/20 1

b) P(X=5) = 4/20 = 0.2

c) P(X ≤ 2) = F(2) = 1/20 + 0.05 = 0.1 + 0.05 = 0.15

d) The expected value (or mean) of X is:

E(X) = ∑[x * f(x)] = (0 * 0) + (1 * 1/20) + (2 * 0.05) + (3 * 7/20) + (4 * 0.1) + (5 * 4/20) = 2.7

Therefore, the expected value of the number of rejected items per day is 2.7.

e) The variance of X is:

Var(X) = ∑[(x - E(X))^2 * f(x)] = (0 - 2.7)^2 * 0 + (1 - 2.7)^2 * 1/20 + (2 - 2.7)^2 * 0.05 + (3 - 2.7)^2 * 7/20 + (4 - 2.7)^2 * 0.1 + (5 - 2.7)^2 * 4/20

= 0.81 * 0 + 0.49 * 0.05 + 0.0225 * 0.05 + 0.09 * 0.35 + 0.0225 * 0.1 + 0.49 * 0.2

= 0.107

The standard deviation of X is:

SD(X) = sqrt(Var(X)) = sqrt(0.107) = 0.327

Therefore, the variance and standard deviation of rejected items per day are 0.107 and 0.327, respectively.

To learn more about distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28060657

#SPJ11

The chemical equation N2 + 3H2 ---> 2NH3 tells us that in order to make two molecules of NH3, we need one molecule of N2 and three molecules of H2.

To figure out how many moles (which is just a way of measuring how much of a substance you have) of H2 we need to react with 14.0 g of N2, we can use the information from the equation.

First, we convert the 14.0 g of N2 to moles (which means we're figuring out how many pieces of N2 we have, because 1 mole = Avogadro's number of particles, or roughly 6.022 x 10^23).

14.0 g N2 x (1 mol N2/28 g N2) = 0.5 mol N2

Then, we use the mole ratio from the equation to figure out how many moles of H2 we need:

0.5 mol N2 x (3 mol H2/1 mol N2) = 1.5 mol H2

So we'd need 1.5 moles of H2 to react completely with 14.0 g of N2.

The absolute minimum and absolute maximum values of the function f(x) = 3x^4 - 4x^3 - 36x^2 on the interval [-3, 5] are -283 and 81, respectively. To get the absolute minimum and absolute maximum values of the function f(x) = 3x^4 - 4x^3 - 36x^2 on the interval [-3, 5].

Step 1: Find the critical points by taking the derivative of the function and setting it equal to zero.
f'(x) = 12x^3 - 12x^2 - 72x
Step 2: Factor the derivative.
f'(x) = 12x(x^2 - x - 6)
Step 3: Solve for x to find the critical points.
x = 0, x = -1, x = 6
Step 4: Evaluate the function at the critical points and endpoints of the interval.
f(-3) = 81
f(0) = 0
f(-1) = 43
f(5) = -283
Step 5: Identify the absolute minimum and absolute maximum values.
The absolute minimum value of f(x) is -283 at x = 5.
The absolute maximum value of f(x) is 81 at x = -3.
So, the absolute minimum and absolute maximum values of the function f(x) = 3x^4 - 4x^3 - 36x^2 on the interval [-3, 5] are -283 and 81, respectively.

Learn more about absolute maximum value here, https://brainly.com/question/19921479

#SPJ11

Answer:

center = -1, -3

radius = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

x² + y² + 2x + 6y = 26

x² + 2x + y² +6y = 26

equation of a circle is,

(x - h)² + (y - k)² = r²

where center of a circle is (h,k)

radius = r

x² + 2x + y² + 6y = 26

finding the middle point for mid term breaking of the equations,

(2/2)² = 1

(6/2)² = 9

x² + 2x + 1 + y² + 6y + 9 = 26 + 1 +9

to balance the equation we have to add the midpoints at both sides,

thus we have equation of a circle,

(x + 1)² + (y + 3)² = 36

so,

centre of a circle = -1, -3

radius = 6

Cy = [1 1 1; 0 1 1; 0 0 1] [p(1-p) 0 0; 0 p(1-p) 0; 0 0 p(1-p)] [1 0 0; 1 1 0; 1 1 1]

Cy = [

(a) The probability mass function (PMF) for X is:

px(x1, x2, x3) = P(X1 = x1, X2 = x2, X3 = x3) = P(X1 = x1) * P(X2 = x2) * P(X3 = x3) = (1-p)^(1-x1) * p^(x1) * (1-p)^(1-x2) * p^(x2) * (1-p)^(1-x3) * p^(x3) = p^(x1+x2+x3) * (1-p)^(3-x1-x2-x3)

where p=1/4 is the probability of success and (x1,x2,x3) can take values in {0,1}.

(b) The covariance matrix Cx can be calculated using the formula:

Cx = E[(X - mu)(X - mu)^T]

where mu is the mean vector of X, which is [p, p, p]^T in this case, and E denotes the expected value.

Using the fact that X1, X2, X3 are independent, we have:

E[X1X2] = E[X1]E[X2] = p^2

E[X1X3] = E[X1]E[X3] = p^2

E[X2X3] = E[X2]E[X3] = p^2

E[X1] = E[X2] = E[X3] = p

E[X1^2] = E[X2^2] = E[X3^2] = p

E[(X1-p)(X2-p)] = E[X1X2] - p^2 = 0

E[(X1-p)(X3-p)] = E[X1X3] - p^2 = 0

E[(X2-p)(X3-p)] = E[X2X3] - p^2 = 0

Therefore, the probability matrix Cx is:

Cx = E[(X - mu)(X - mu)^T] = E[X X^T] - mu mu^T

Cx = [p^2+p(1-p) p^2 p^2;

p^2 p^2+p(1-p) p^2;

p^2 p^2 p^2+p(1-p)]

- [p^2 p^2 p^2;

p^2 p^2 p^2;

p^2 p^2 p^2]

Cx = [p(1-p) 0 0;

0 p(1-p) 0;

0 0 p(1-p)]

(c) Y can be expressed as a linear combination of X:

Y = [1 0 0] X1 + [1 1 0] X2 + [1 1 1] X3

Therefore, the matrix A is:

A = [1 0 0;

1 1 0;

1 1 1]

(d) The covariance matrix Cy of Y can be calculated as:

Cy = A Cx A^T

Substituting the values of A and Cx, we get:

Cy = [1 1 1; 0 1 1; 0 0 1] [p(1-p) 0 0; 0 p(1-p) 0; 0 0 p(1-p)] [1 0 0; 1 1 0; 1 1 1]

Cy = [

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

The first-order and the second-order Taylor formula for f(x, y) = 17e(x+y) at (0,0) is f(x,y) = 17 + 17x + 17y + (17/2)x² + 17xy + (17/2)y²

The first-order Taylor formula for f(x,y) = 17[tex]e^{(x+y)}[/tex] at (0,0) is:

f(x,y) ≈ f(0,0) + ∇f(0,0) · (x,y)

≈ 17[tex]e^{(0+0)}[/tex] + (∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y)(0,0) · (x,y)

≈ 17 + (17,17) · (x,y)

≈ 17 + 17x + 17y

The second-order Taylor formula for f(x,y) = 17[tex]e^{(x+y)}[/tex] at (0,0) is:

f(x,y) ≈ f(0,0) + ∇f(0,0) · (x,y) + (1/2)(x,y) · Hf(0,0) · (x,y)

≈ 17 + (17,17) · (x,y) + (1/2)(x,y) · ( ∂²f/∂x² ∂²f/∂x∂y ; ∂²f/∂y∂x ∂²f/∂y² ) (0,0) · (x,y)

≈ 17 + 17x + 17y + (1/2)(x,y) · (17 17 ; 17 17) · (x,y)

≈ 17 + 17x + 17y + (1/2)(17x² + 34xy + 17y²)

≈ 17 + 17x + 17y + (17/2)x² + 17xy + (17/2)y²

Learn more about the second-order Taylor formula at

https://brainly.com/question/31401542

#SPJ4

This statement is false. it was proved with advanced algebra that a doubled cube could never be constructed with a straightedge and compass. it is false.

Cube is a polygon having six faces. The volume of a cube is a side³

We have given that Doubling the volume of a given cube will require increasing each side length by the cube root of 2.

However, this value is not constructible, only a straightedge and compass.

Thus, This is not possible to construct a cube of twice the volume of a cube by using only a straightedge and compass.

Learn more about cubes here:

brainly.com/question/11168779

#SPJ1

Answer: 120

Step-by-step explanation:V= 8x5x3 =120 ^3

1.35 moles of oxygen and around 1.80 moles of aluminum are mixed in this process.

The balanced chemical formula for the reaction of oxygen and aluminum is:

4 Al + 3 O₂ → 2 Al₂O₃

As a result, in order to create 2 moles of aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), 3 moles of oxygen gas (O₂) must react with 4 moles of aluminum (Al).

We are given 1.35 moles of oxygen gas, thus we can calculate a percentage to estimate how many moles of aluminum are required using this information:

4 moles Al / 3 moles O₂ = x moles Al / 1.35 moles O

Solving for x, we get:

x = 4 moles Al * 1.35 moles O₂ / 3 moles O₂

x ≈ 1.80 moles Al

Therefore, approximately 1.80 moles of aluminum will be used when reacted with 1.35 moles of oxygen in this reaction.

Learn more about chemistry reactions here:

https://brainly.com/question/29039149

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

13.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

i dont know how to do this help me  im on a test and cant do this

The value of x - intercepts are,

⇒ x = ±√5, 0, 0

We have to given that;

The function is,

⇒ f (x) = x⁴ - 5x²

Now, We can find the value of x - intercept as;

⇒ f (x) = x⁴ - 5x²

Plug f (x) = 0

⇒ 0 = x⁴ - 5x²

⇒ x² (x² - 5) = 0

⇒ x² = 0

⇒ x = 0, 0

And, x² - 5 = 0

⇒ x² = 5

⇒ x = ±√5

Thus, The value of x - intercepts are,

⇒ x = ±√5, 0, 0

Learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ1

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2023

The area of the window is 2122.64 ft².

Given that a window has a diameter of 26 feet, we need to find the area of the window,

Since, the window is circular so the area will be = π × radius²

= 3.14 × 26²

= 2122.64 ft²

Hence, the area of the window is 2122.64 ft².

Learn more about areas, click;

https://brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ1

Answer: 3

Step-by-step explanation:

3672 divided by 1400 is 2.6228571428571428571428571428571 and when doing this type of question, you need to round up to the nearest whole number.

So, your answer would be 3 tubes of paint.

Hope this helps! :)

This is a two-tailed test, and the P-value associated with this situation is between 0.05 and 0.1.

The t-test analysis for the mean lifetime of pond flies.

(1) To determine if this is a right-tailed, left-tailed, or two-tailed test, we need to consider the hypothesis being tested. In this case, the biologist wants to know if the mean lifetime for all pond flies of a particular type is 24.6 days.

The null hypothesis (H0) would be that the mean lifetime is equal to 24.6 days (μ = 24.6), while the alternative hypothesis (H1) would be that the mean lifetime is not equal to 24.6 days (μ ≠ 24.6).

Since the alternative hypothesis is testing for a difference in either direction, this would be a two-tailed test.

(2) To find the P-value, we need to consult the t-table using the test statistic, t = 2.025, and the degrees of freedom, which is calculated as (sample size - 1) or (38 - 1) = 37. Looking up these values in the t-table, you'll find that the P-value lies between 0.025 and 0.05. Since this is a two-tailed test, you should multiply the value by 2, giving you a final P-value range between 0.05 and 0.1.

Your answer: This is a two-tailed test, and the P-value associated with this situation is between 0.05 and 0.1.

To know more about "Null Hypothesis" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30535681#

#SPJ11