Answer:
The (B) Sherman Antitrust Act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly.
This act made this illegal and you could be arrested. The main purpose of this act was to conserve competition is business.I hope this helped at all.
Answer:
B. Sherman Antitrust Act
Explanation:
Correct on Edmentum
A guest presents an intact driver's license with a photo that resembles the ; however, the license expired a month agoWhat should the server/seller do?
Ask the guest for the date of birth on the license .
Tell the guest to recite the home address .
Check for all other features of a valid ID.
Refuse alcohol service .
Considering the situation described above, what the server or seller should do is that " Check for all other features of a valid ID."
When verifying an Identification of a guest, the seller should check all the features that make the ID valid. These features include the following:
Photo height and width must match guestThe birth and expiration dates;The size of the ID The color of the ID,The thickness of the IDThe corners of ID, to check for any tears, frays, etc.In the servesafe alcoholic test, the IDs that are considered acceptable include the following:
Drivers License,State ID card,Active military ID, Passport.Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "Check for all other features of a valid ID."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/23973470
Activity 6
Directions: Write TRUE if the statement is correct and FALSE if not. _______1. Blood distributes oxygen and nutrients throughout the body and assists in the removal of metabolic wastes.
_______2. The is the control center of the body.
_______3. Both the and the lungs support each other to allow distribution of nutrients and oxygen to all parts and the removal of metabolic wastes.
_______4. If the brain stops, all processes of all body parts will continue working.
_______5. The principal function of the lungs is to transport oxygen from the atmosphere into the bloodstream and to release carbon dioxide from the bloodstream into the atmosphere.
True 1. Blood distributes oxygen and nutrients throughout the body and assists in the removal of metabolic wastes.
False 2. The is the control center of the body.
False 3. Both the and the lungs support each other to allow distribution of nutrients and oxygen to all parts and the removal of metabolic wastes.
False 4. If the brain stops, all processes of all body parts will continue working.
True 5. The principal function of the lungs is to transport oxygen from the atmosphere into the bloodstream and to release carbon dioxide from the bloodstream into the atmosphere.
1. In own words, Learning criminality is likened to learning everyday activities. Give an example of an everyday activity learned from others as criminality is learned.
2.In own words, What are techniques of neutralization, proposed by Sykes and Matza? Pick one neutralization (such as denial of responsibility, denial of a victim, appeal to higher loyalty, etc.) and use it in a hypothetical (or real) situation.
3. In own words, Describe the difference between primary and secondary deviance, as developed by Lemert.
An example of an everyday activity learned from others as criminality is learned is the use of drugs and engaging in violence.
According to social learning theory, individuals engage in crime due to their association with others who take part in the crime. In this case, the criminal behavior is enforced.
The techniques of neutralization, proposed by Sykes and Matza include:
Denial of responsibility.Denial of injury Appeal to higher loyalties.Condemnation of condemners.Denial of victims.The difference between primary and secondary deviance is that primary deviance refers to the violation of a norm which doesn't lead to the violator being stigmatized as deviant while for secondary deviance, the violator is seen as a deviant.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25715684
What are 10 issues discussed in Article 1 of the Constitution?
Is anyone able to list 10 plz help me. Thank you
Make a list of 1-3 modifications to law enforcement hiring that you'd make to make the community safer.
Answer:
1. ENSURE EVERY COP IS A RECRUITER
2.SELECT THE BEST RECRUITMENT OFFICER
3. MAINTAIN COMMUNICATION WITH APPLICANTS DURING THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS
Explanation:
DO AGREE THAT MOST CRIMINAL IN PRISON TODAY ARE WITH LOW LEVEL OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE?WHY?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: From an article, it said, "Within three years of their release, two out of three former prisoners are rearrested and more than 50% are incarcerated again." It shows that most of the criminals get rearrested which means they do not have emotion of guilt so they have low level of emotional intelligence.
please hellppppppppppppp.
how was the 1999 constitution formed.
in not less than 150 words.
Answer: The 1999 Constitution was promulgated into law by the military regime of General Abdulsalami Abubakar after the Constitution Debate Co-ordinating Committee led by Justice Niki Tobi submitted its report. The Tobi Committee had barely two months to consult with Nigerians before submitting its report.
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
what are seven reasons police officers are allowed to exercise discretion in the day to do work?
Answer:
the law should be flexible in some ways in order to ensure that the spirit of the law is satisfied
whether to draw his weapon. whether to make an arrest. whether to issue a traffic ticket or other violation
Explanation:
If I were to add alcohol to the education system what problems would I CREATE? Meaning what problems would I create if I taught kids about alcohol in school as a module?
A lot of people don't understand this question.
Answer:
reducing the number of hours committed to studying
Explanation:
hope it helps
[tex] \: \: \: \: [/tex]
you can bring alcohol in school of it's your project or if your using it on science
Alcohol use could also affect performance by reducing the number of hours committed to studying, completing homework assignments, and attending school. ... Both studies found that drinking had a direct negative effect on GPA and an indirect negative effect through reduced study hours.hope it helps[tex] \: \: \: \: \: [/tex]
Kaelyn's mother, Judy, looks after Kaelyn's four-year-old twins so Kaelyn can go to work (she drops off and picks up the twins from Judy's home every day). Since Judy is a relative, Kaelyn made sure, for tax purposes, to pay her mother the going rate for child care ($16,300 for the year). What is the amount of Kaelyn's child and dependent care credit in 2021 if her AGI for the year was $130,000?
Considering the situation described above, Kaelyn's child and dependent care credit in 2021 if her AGI for the year was $130,000 is "$16,000."
This is because according to the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, individuals can claim the child and dependent care credit of $16,000 of expenses for two or more qualifying people.
Given that the qualifying people here are four-year-old twins, this makes it two or more qualifying people.
Though Kaelyn's Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) is $130,000, the rule of using 50% - 20% of expenses to claim the child and dependent care credit will come into play if the eventual credit will be more than $16,000.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is $16,000.
Learn more about the child and dependent care credit here: https://brainly.com/question/14441741
Answer:
Kaelyn's child and dependent care credit is $1200 if you use year of 2022 applicable percentage.
Explanation:
My opinion is that the amount won't be so high like first answer, so I write down what I think here.
I didn't get the percentage about 2021, but I think the number is near, so I use 2022 percentages for reference. Next person may get one ask for 2022.
In 2022, the maximum child and dependent care credit is $3,000 for one qualifying person, so twins will get $6000. The applicable percentage is 20% of the AGI over 43,000, so it is $6,000 x 20%=1200.
Isabelle found shell casings at the secondary crime scene. What type of evidence does this BEST represent?
Answer:
A weapon was used at the scene
the house agreed to the compromise as soon as the senate approved it
Answer:
July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.
Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.
In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.
By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”
The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.
Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.
Explanation:
~L~
Often times, ___
killed in alcohol-related crashes.
A. no one is
B. only the guilty party is
C. passengers
Answer:
I think it's C.passengers
Often times, passengers killed in alcohol-related crashes. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is passenger?A passenger is a person who travels in a vehicle but has no responsibility for the chores required for that vehicle to arrive at its destination or to run the vehicle in any other way. A passenger is not a steward. A passenger is someone who travels in a transportation such as a bus, boat, or plane but is not operating it or working on it.
Young people, according to statistics, are the most vulnerable to intoxicated driving. Passengers are frequently killed in alcohol-related accidents. Other typical injuries caused by alcohol drinking include falls and fire burns. Falls, in particular, are the greatest cause of fatal and non - fatal injury in the United States. As inebriated over the legal limit, the probability of falling increases 60-fold when compared to a sober individual.
As a result, the often times, passengers killed in alcohol-related crashes. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on passengers, here:
https://brainly.com/question/199361
#SPJ2
Pleasantville police officers Fred and Barney were dispatched to investigate a robbery alarm call at the Hop-In liquor store. Central dispatch advised the responding units that they had attempted to call the store by phone, but there had been no answer. Upon arrival at the Hop-In, responding officers found the front door standing wide open and a male store clerk lying on the floor inside, deceased from an apparent gunshot wound to the chest. The cash register was empty and the store had been ransacked.
Officers quickly reviewed the store’s security videotape for evidence. The video depicted two male suspects, one wearing a red hooded sweatshirt and the other wearing a green T-shirt and blue baseball cap. Officers broadcast the suspects’ descriptions to other Pleasantville officers, and within an hour, two suspects were under arrest for the robbery and murder of the store clerk. The suspects were identified as Larry and Moe. Larry and Moe were booked into the Pleasantville jail and placed in separate cells pending follow-up by Pleasantville detectives.
The following morning Detective Smith interviewed the suspects separately about the robbery and murder. Detective Smith advised each of the suspects of his rights under Miranda. Both Larry and Moe refused to make any statement (invoking their Fifth Amendment protections) and demanded that they be placed back in their respective cells. Detective Smith called for jail guards to take the suspects back to their cells. As the guards were doing so, they noticed graffiti on the jail cell walls. In Moe’s cell, the wall read, “Sorry God for what I have done, no one was meant to die.” In Larry’s cell, the wall read, “I am innocent of murder, I may be guilty of robbery, but I didn’t kill anyone, it was Moe!”
Larry and Moe are charged criminally for the robbery and murder of the store clerk. During the trial the prosecutor attempts to enter the writings on the jail cell walls as evidence against both defendants. The prosecutor calls the jail guards as witnesses to testify that the graffiti writings were not on the wall prior to Larry and Moe being placed in their individual cells. The attorneys for Larry and Moe object to the writings being admitted as evidence. They base their objection on the fact that each defendant had clearly invoked his Fifth Amendment rights.
The judge advises the courtroom that she will need a few minutes to review the defendants’ objection and orders the court into a thirty-minute recess. Now it is your turn to be the judge. While reviewing defense counsels’ objection, you must decide the following:
1.Should the writings be allowed into the trial as evidence?
2.Can Moe's writing be used against him? Why or why not?
3.Can Larry's writing be used against him? Why or why not?
4.Can Larry’s writings be used against Moe? Why or why not?
Answer:
1-2-3-4 NO / Who's to say an officer didnt write that inside the cell to have a quick and speedy trial where they are both found guilty but one with a lesser term ? Even if prior to Moe and Larry being kept in SEPERATE cells , this would make it seem more evident that they are blaming Moe for the murder. Larry could have accepted a plea deal to get a shorter sentencing then Moe and only face Burgulary charges indefinite to the counts of murder Larry could face.
Explanation:
EVEN if this is true and Larry commited the henious crime , it cannot be used against him in terms of evidence since when he first got arrested and it was informed to him of his rights under Miranda Law he still pleas the fifth here in the excerpt "Both Larry and Moe refused to make any statement (invoking their Fifth Amendment protections)" this is prior to getting arrested and prior to being interrogated , This does'nt mean either of them are guilty yet BUT makes them look suspicious/guilty infront of the jury. This is because they didn't want to be interrogated or questioned.
THE RIGHT REASONING WOULD BE NO UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES!!!A
is a one-on-one identification procedure. The suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm
B:
identity.
IP
A
Lineup
8
B Showup
C Pretrial examination
D
Bringup
Under the 1 -1 identification procedure, the suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm the witness identity.
The 1 -1 identification procedure is a procedure used by the police to test the ability of witnesses to identify a person they have seen on a previous occasion.
Hence, under this procedure, the suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm the witness identity.Therefore, the Option A. is correct.
Read more about 1 -1 identification procedure:
brainly.com/question/17939627
Type the correct answer in the box Spell all words correctly
Which type of agreement have the defense and prosecution entered in the given scenario?
Mervin has been accused of committing burglary. His defense attorney, Robert, has realized that his client has a weak case, Robert has thus
advised Mervin to state he has committed the crime in return, the prosecution has agreed to offer Mervin a lighter sentence. The defense and
prosecution have thus entered a
agreement
orange zest or star frost? PLEASE HELP I NEED IT
Answer:
Starfrost
Explanation:
<3
Answer:
Orange Zest
Explanation:
<3 ( ' o ')
Question 3 (1 point)
Both Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier and Tinker v Des Moines dealt with freedom of
expression
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
what are the factors of 108 and 999
[tex]70 \time 80 + [/tex]
What is a label claiming patent protection for an application not yet granted.
Answer: patent pending
Explanation:
How many bones are in the human body?
Answer:
206 bones
I hope it's helpful for you ✌️Answer:
How many bones are in the human body?
→ Around 206 to 213 bones.1.What is meant by executory consideration?A. Consideration provided by an executor.B.The exchange of consideration.Where consideration has already been completedD. Where there is a promise to do something in the future
Answer:
D, Where there is a promise to do something in the future
I hope this helped at all.
The first hate crime legislation was the Civil Rights Act of 1968.
False
True
Directions: Please find, research, and summarize a current event that took place in the last 1 year. After picking a topic, research the current even thoroughly and summarize the event in 4-5 sentences. Think about and include the cause, effect, and significance of the event in your summary. Your summary must be in complete and detailed sentences.
Example of topics: Increase of Wildfires, Capitol Riot, Extreme Drought, etc.
Please use the following links to help you research current events:
1) www.npr.org
2) www.libraryofcongress.gov
3) NYTimes.com
Which of the following is an example of an independent federal agency?
select all that apply.
FDIC
Amtrak
FEC
FCC
CIA
Fannie Mae
EPA
Answer:
FCCExplanation:
I hope it's helpful for you
The PMC industry performs a service that cannot be provided by any other source
A PMC (private military company) is a private company that provides security services in exchange for money. Technically speaking, armies are able to preform the same service. So the PMC industry DOES preform a service that CAN be provided by another source. Also mercenaries, pirates, and rent-a-cop companies do the same thing.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
A private military company (PMC) is a private company providing armed combat or security services for financial gain. PMCs refer to their operationally deployed personnel as "security contractors" or "private military contractors".
Explanation:
PMCs specialize in providing combat and protection forces. Their work ranges from running small-scale training missions to providing combat units composed of up to several hundred highly trained soldiers equipped with powerful weapons platforms, including tanks and attack helicopters.
why Miranda is considered one of the most important cases in the history of our legal system
Answer:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Explanation:
If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, it: None of these answers. Can remove the unconscionable clause but may not refuse to enforce the contract. Can amend the unconscionable clause but may not remove it completely. Can refuse to enforce the contract but cannot amend it.
Answer:
If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, they can amend the unconscionable clause, but may not remove it completely.
I hope this helped at all.
2: When passing another vehicle, you are allowed to exceed the speed limit by?
a) O 10 mph.
b) O 5 mph.
c) O 3 mph.
d) O 0 mph.
Answer: 10 mph
Explanation:
The passing of another vehicle, are allowed to exceed the speed limit by 10 mph. Thus, the option (a) is the correct.
What is vehicle?
Transport of persons and products from one location to another is referred to as using a “vehicle.” When traveling somewhere else, the automobile is useful. The car satisfies the necessities and necessities of the bare minimum. Different kinds of vehicles exist, including cars, buses, boats, spaceships, trucks, and airplanes.
The legal maximum speed for cars has been set by the government. The car was moving at a 45 km/h excess. People who use vehicles must adhere to the government's tight speed restriction requirement. The government is authorized to travel 10 to 15 mph faster than the posted limit.
Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on vehicle, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13390217
#SPJ2
Eric is a Missouri resident and a sentenced offender. He was sentenced to three years of probation with the following conditions:
1. He must not violate any law of any state or any local ordinance.
2. He must report to Probation Officer Greg James monthly at a predetermined time.
3. He must not use any illegal substance or alcohol and must also submit to random testing.
4. He must obtain permission from Probation Officer James before traveling out of Missouri.
In his second year of probation, Eric was captured by store detectives stealing a satellite radio system from an electronics store in Orlando, Florida. The Orlando Police Department responded to the scene and investigated. After interviewing the store detectives, they issued Eric a misdemeanor appearance citation for shoplifting. The appearance citation contained a mandatory court date for the following month.
Approximately three months later, Probation Officer James received a letter from the local district court in Orlando, Florida. The letter informed James that probationer Eric was in Orlando in January, received a misdemeanor violation for shoplifting, and has since failed to report for the scheduled court date; a warrant has now been issued by the Orlando District Court. James reviewed probationer Eric’s file and found no record of any request to leave the state for any type of travel. Eric’s home address is listed as Springfield, Missouri.
Probation Officer James prepared all of the paperwork required to initiate probation revocation proceedings against Eric. James also sent Eric written notice that the terms of his probation had been breached and that his probation had been placed in jeopardy. The notice informed Eric that a hearing had been set for the probation revocation. During the hearing, Eric will have an opportunity to present evidence on his own behalf.
On the date of the hearing, Eric and James arrived at the courthouse to present their arguments before the presiding judge. During the hearing, Probation Officer James presented evidence supporting the alleged breach of the conditions of probation. He presented sworn statements from Orlando store detectives regarding the shoplifting incident and sworn statements from the Orlando police officer who issued Eric the misdemeanor appearance citation. Eric responded to the allegations by testifying that the Orlando misdemeanor case was a case of mistaken identity and that he was at home in Missouri during that time. James rebutted Eric’s testimony by restating that his witnesses (through their sworn statements) could attest to the fact that Eric was in fact arrested in Orlando for shoplifting the satellite radio system on the date in question. At the close of all testimony, the judge sent the courtroom into a fifteen-minute recess so that he could review all of the testimony and reread the sworn statements from the absent witnesses.
Approximately fifteen minutes later, the judge returned to the bench and announced his decision that Eric had violated the conditions of his probation agreement and should now be sent back to prison to serve out the remainder of the original sentence. The judge added that Eric will face the shoplifting charges upon release from prison. The court then served Eric with a written order stating all of the reasons for the probation revocation.
Can Probation Eric be prosecuted for shoplifting after release from prison, or would that constitute double jeopardy?
Answer:
Yes, he can be prosecuted.
Explanation:
It would not be considered Double jeopardy, since what he was being prosecuted for was something completely different. It was for shoplifting. Also, he violated the conditions for his probation, he violated the law of the state when he shoplifted.