Answer:
After World War I, many countries in eastern Europe began to establish new democracies. These new governments faced many challenges as they sought to establish stability and build a prosperous future for their people. One of the key challenges they faced was the need for international recognition and support.
Britain and France played a crucial role in providing this support. They recognized the new governments of eastern Europe and offered them economic and political assistance. This assistance helped these new democracies to establish themselves and begin the difficult process of rebuilding their countries after the devastation of World War I.
Despite this support, both Britain and France ultimately gave in to Hitler's demands in the late 1930s. There are several reasons why this happened.
First, many leaders in Britain and France were still traumatized by the devastation of World War I. They were reluctant to engage in another war, and they hoped that by appeasing Hitler, they could avoid conflict.
Second, Britain and France were both facing economic difficulties during this time period. They feared that a war with Germany would further damage their economies and lead to political unrest.
Third, Britain and France were both preoccupied with their own domestic political concerns. They were reluctant to engage in a foreign conflict that might lead to political unrest at home.
Finally, there was a general sense of complacency and a failure to fully appreciate the danger posed by Hitler and the Nazi regime. Many leaders in Britain and France believed that Hitler was simply a blustering demagogue who could be easily contained and controlled.
Despite these factors, it is important to note that many leaders in Britain and France were deeply committed to the principles of democracy and freedom. They believed that these principles were worth fighting for, and they ultimately did engage in a bitter struggle against Nazi tyranny. In the end, it was the sacrifices of these brave men and women that helped to defeat Hitler and secure the freedoms that we enjoy today.
Explanation:
roosevelt hoped that the U.S will respond to the attack by…
Answer:
Franklin Roosevelt hoped that the U.S. would respond to the attack on Pearl Harbor by declaring war on Japan and entering World War II on the side of the Allies.
Explanation:
Explain what happened with regard to schooling during the 1930s, and how it
impacted younger children as well as older students.
Answer:
schools were over populated and unfunded
Explanation:
Anyone have songs that could fit any of these people.
Voltaire
John Locke
Baron de Montesquieu
Jean
Jacques Rousseau
(((ITS FOR A ENLIGHTENMENT PROJECT)))
The songs that fits them are:
Imagine Dragons - BelieverBastille - Things We Lost In The FireColdplay - Viva La VidaWhat is the song about?These scholars had reason, science, devout resistance, and what they called “natural rights”—life, freedom, and property. Illumination logicians John Locke, Charles Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all created hypotheses of government in which a few or indeed all the individuals would administer.
These melodies are chosen based on their verses, subjects, and generally disposition, which may adjust with the thoughts and rationalities of each Edification scholar.
Learn more about John Locke from
https://brainly.com/question/870852
#SPJ1
What was the short-term consequence of Shay's Rebellion
evaluate the effects of the roosevelt administration's response to the problems of the great depression between 1933 and 1941
The Roosevelt Administration's response to the Great Depression between 1933 and 1941 involved a series of economic policies and programs known as the New Deal.
The primary objectives of the New Deal were relief, recovery, and reform.
First, relief programs like the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the Works Progress Administration (WPA) provided jobs and financial support for millions of unemployed Americans. These programs not only offered immediate relief but also improved infrastructure and public works.Second, recovery measures aimed to revive the economy. The National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) and the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) helped stabilize industrial and agricultural sectors by regulating production levels and prices.Lastly, reform initiatives such as the Social Security Act and the Glass-Steagall Banking Act sought to prevent future economic crises. These acts established a social safety net and improved financial regulations.Overall, the Roosevelt Administration's response to the Great Depression had mixed effects. The New Deal provided immediate relief and restored confidence in the economy, but some critics argue that the policies prolonged the depression by hindering free-market forces.
However, the reforms implemented during this period significantly shaped the American economic and social landscape, laying the foundation for modern welfare programs and financial regulations.
Learn more about Great Depression:
https://brainly.com/question/20513444
#SPJ11
what factor made the philippines a center for shipbuilding? (select all that apply) group of answer choices abundant supply of quality lumber. the location of the philippines in relation to transpacific trade routes indios were highly skilled ship builders. it's close proximity to the east coast of the us indios were an abundant source of cheap and exploitable labor.
The factors that made the Philippines a center for shipbuilding include:
Abundant supply of quality lumber (1)the location of the Philippines in relation to transpacific trade routes (2) Indios were highly skilled ship builders (3)Indios were an abundant source of cheap and exploitable labor (5)The Philippines became a center for shipbuilding due to several factors. Firstly, the country had an abundant supply of quality lumber, which was essential for constructing ships. Additionally, the location of the Philippines in relation to transpacific trade routes made it a strategic location for shipbuilding.
Moreover, the Indios, who were the local population, provided an abundant source of cheap and exploitable labor, which made shipbuilding more cost-effective. Lastly, the Indios were also highly skilled shipbuilders, which added to the country's competitive advantage in the shipbuilding industry. These factors combined to make the Philippines a leading center for shipbuilding during the colonial period.
Options 1, 2, 3 and 5 are correct.
Learn more about Philippines: https://brainly.com/question/28473331
#SPJ11
7.3.4 project making a difference
Our aim for this wiring undertaking is to generate a solar-driven lighting mechanism that will make a difference in the lives of communities experiencing hardships.
What is the first step?Our first step involves handpicking high-performance solar panels and then coupling them, increasing their power-output output through parallel wiring.
Subsequently, we link those, serving as energy stores, with a charge controller to forestall overcharging occurrences from happening. Later on, we put this all together by connecting said battery bank with LED light fixings before deploying them into one sought-out community who we also educate about proper maintenance techniques.
As a result, this project imparts light to people who need it most and positively enhances their day-to-day living conditions.
Read more about writing projects here:
https://brainly.com/question/514799
#SPJ1
Who invaded neutral Belgium
Germany invaded neutral Belgium at the start of World War I. This was part of the Schlieffen Plan, which was an attempt to capture Paris quickly by catching the French off guard by invading through neutral countries. The invasion of Belgium by Germany led to Britain declaring war on Germany, as Britain had guaranteed Belgium’s neutrality.
MARK ME BRAINLEISTTrue or false
In Egypt and later in the Battle of (Saint Domingue), Napoleon suffered rare military defeats at the hands of the same man, British Admiral Horatio Nelson.
In Egypt and later in the Battle of (Saint Domingue), Napoleon suffered rare military defeats at the hands of the same man, British Admiral Horatio Nelson is False.
While Napoleon did suffer a rare military defeat at the hands of British Admiral Horatio Nelson in the Battle of the Nile in Egypt, he did not face Nelson in the Battle of Saint Domingue. The Battle of Saint Domingue was fought between French and British forces in Haiti in 1803.
In Egypt, Napoleon did suffer a defeat at the hands of British Admiral Horatio Nelson during the Battle of the Nile in 1798. However, the Battle of Saint Domingue (1802-1803) was not a direct confrontation between Napoleon and Nelson. It was a conflict in the French colony of Saint Domingue (now Haiti) between French forces and a rebellion led by Toussaint Louverture. Admiral Nelson was not directly involved in this battle.
Learn more about Saint Domingue here: brainly.com/question/27863988
#SPJ11
What was the american people's opinion about nixon expanding the war into cambodia
Answer: Though President Nixon expanded the war in Vietnam into Laos and Cambodia, his administration pursued a policy of Vietnamization, which aimed at reducing the number of American troops in the war.
Explanation: Vietnamization refers to the doctrine of President Richard Nixon from the time of the Vietnam War, according to which US forces would gradually withdraw from Vietnam and leave the defense of South Vietnam to the Vietnamese. At the same time, America would send modern weapons, equipment, advisers and financial aid to South Vietnam to compensate for the departure of their troops.
How did the thinking of other scientists impact the development and publication of Charles Darwin’s ideas about evolution?Answer in 2-4 sentences, including the words below:
Naturalist
Evolution
Answer:
As a naturalist, Charles Darwin was influenced by the work of other scientists, including geologist Charles Lyell, who argued that the Earth was much older than previously believed. Darwin's own observations during his voyage on the HMS Beagle and his studies of natural selection led him to develop his theory of evolution. However, he delayed publishing his ideas for many years due to concerns about how they would be received by the scientific community and the public.
Explanation:
How did the attitudes toward Great Britain and France shape American politics in the late eighteenth century?
Identify the following acts.
In the late eighteenth century, attitudes toward Great Britain and France played a significant role in shaping American politics. The American Revolution had just ended, and the United States was a new, independent country trying to establish its place in the world. There were two main political factions that emerged during this time: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans.
The Federalists tended to be more sympathetic to Great Britain, while the Democratic-Republicans were more sympathetic to France. This divide was largely based on ideological differences and different interpretations of the American Revolution. The Federalists saw Great Britain as a valuable trading partner and believed that the United States should maintain close ties with its former colonial ruler. They also believed in a strong federal government and a centralized banking system.
On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans saw France as a natural ally of the United States, given its support during the American Revolution. They were more skeptical of centralized power and believed in states' rights and a more decentralized banking system.
Several acts during this time period further heightened tensions between the United States, Great Britain, and France. These acts included:
Jay's Treaty (1795): This treaty was negotiated by Chief Justice John Jay and sought to resolve several outstanding issues between the United States and Great Britain, including disputes over trade and the impressment of American sailors. The treaty was controversial, as some felt that it favored Great Britain over the United States.
The XYZ Affair (1797-98): This was a diplomatic incident between the United States and France, in which three French agents (known only as "X," "Y," and "Z") demanded bribes and loans from American diplomats in exchange for negotiating a treaty. This incident further strained relations between the two countries.
The Alien and Sedition Acts (1798): These acts were passed by the Federalist-controlled Congress in response to growing tensions with France. They made it more difficult for immigrants to become citizens and gave the government greater powers to deport foreigners, as well as making it illegal to criticize the government or its officials.
Overall, attitudes toward Great Britain and France played a significant role in shaping American politics in the late eighteenth century. These attitudes were deeply rooted in ideological differences and different interpretations of the American Revolution, and were further heightened by several controversial acts and diplomatic incidents.
1. Identify ONE claim made in the passage
"The seventeenth century saw the heyday of the [European] East India Companies. They became an inevitable part of the politics and economy of South India, finding their way into the society and even the vocabulary of the local people. The ‘kumbini’,* as the local populace called it, was not to be ignored. As with the rest [of the population], the spinners and weavers, the washers, the dyers and the once powerful textile-merchant guilds had their links with the company [warehouses]. Of course there were also those merchants and weavers who operated independently of the company, but their proportion was small.
With the establishment of the rival European companies in the seventeenth century, the lives of the weavers [of South India] no longer revolved around the temple but around the European [warehouses] and the towns [on the outskirts of European trading posts]. The weavers gradually began losing their bargaining power and independence. . . . Their creativity also suffered since they were compelled to copy mechanically the [designs] provided to them [by the companies’ officials]. Economically they were much worse off. "
*a Tamil pronunciation of the word "company"
Vijaya Ramaswamy, Indian historian, book published in 1985
The text establishes the claim that during the seventeenth century, the emergence of European East India Companies had a massive effect on the politics, economy, and society of South India, thereby resulting in the diminishment of independence, negotiating capacity, and inventive aptitude from the weavers, increasing their economic suffering.
What is the claim pf the passageIt examines the influence the companies had on South India's weavers, suggesting that the people referred to them as "kumbini" and granting them major clout in the region's political and economic operations.
Read more on the East India Companies here:https://brainly.com/question/1359451
#SPJ1
hat was the dominant ideology in the new nations of the former spanish empire in the century after independence
The dominant ideology in the new nations of the former Spanish Empire in the century after independence was that of liberalism.
This ideology was based on the principles of individual liberty, free trade, and limited government intervention. It saw the state as a necessary evil and believed in the individual’s right to pursue his or her own interests without interference from the government.
Liberals also championed the idea of a nation-state, where all citizens would be subject to the same laws and rights. This ideology was embraced by many of the new governments as they sought to create a more unified nation out of the former colonies.
In time, it would become the cornerstone of the new nations’ identities and the basis for their economic and political development.
Know more about liberalism here
https://brainly.com/question/31428681#
#SPJ11
The 1920s were a time when most women who stayed home
A. Had less leisure time
B. Enjoyed more leisure time
C. Had fewer home products to use
D. Needed a college education
Answer:b i hope that helps
Explanation:
chaing kai-shek question 1 options: each of these answers is correct sought to undermine japanese influence in china, especially during world war ii fought a civil war against mao formed a coalition with mao during world war ii
Chiang Kai-shek was a complex figure who played a significant role in Chinese history. While he is often criticized for his authoritarianism and lack of democratic values, he is also remembered as a hero who fought bravely against Japanese aggression and helped to establish a united front against a common enemy.
Chiang Kai-shek was a prominent figure in Chinese politics and military affairs during the 20th century. He served as the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Republic of China (ROC) from 1928 until 1975. One of his key goals was to undermine Japanese influence in China, especially during World War II. He fought tirelessly to resist Japanese aggression, and his efforts were instrumental in slowing down the Japanese advance in China.
However, Chiang Kai-shek's legacy is somewhat controversial. He also fought a civil war against Mao Zedong's Communist Party, which led to the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949. Many of Chiang's policies were seen as repressive, and his government was criticized for its corruption and lack of democracy. Despite this, Chiang maintained a strong coalition with Mao during World War II, which helped to unify the Chinese people against the common enemy of Japan.
Learn More about authoritarianism here :-
https://brainly.com/question/30019371
#SPJ11
What was the MOST significant consequence of the Boston Massacre of March 1770?
The Boston Massacre was a significant event that took place on March 5, 1770, in Boston, Massachusetts. The event marked a turning point in the American Revolution and had several significant consequences, but the MOST significant consequence is a matter of debate among historians. Here are a few possible answers:
Heightened tensions: The Boston Massacre increased tensions between the American colonists and the British government, leading to a more significant and widespread anti-British sentiment. This, in turn, contributed to the growing movement for independence.
Propaganda: The event was used as propaganda by the American colonists to galvanize support for their cause. Paul Revere's engraving of the event, which depicted the British soldiers firing on innocent civilians, was widely circulated and helped to shape public opinion.
Legal consequences: The trial of the British soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre helped to establish the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" in American jurisprudence. The trial also highlighted the tension between the colonists' desire for justice and the British government's insistence on maintaining order.
The removal of British troops from Boston: The Massacre, combined with other factors such as the Boston Tea Party, led to the British government deciding to withdraw troops from Boston. This reduced the British military presence in the city and helped to defuse tensions.
Who did you nominate to receive the humanitarian award?
Why did you nominate this person?
Discuss your peers' nominations.
Cast your vote.
The person nominated has to be someone that has leadership capabilities and has the interest of humans at heart
How to nominateIn order to submit an individual for a humanitarian award, you must recognize those that have made noteworthy accomplishments in advancing human welfare and the betterment of society.
This may encompass persons focused on reducing poverty, establishing social equity, safeguarding human rights as well as attending to other pressing matters related to societal and environmental issues.
As soon as you designate a suitable candidate, it is time to put together a nomination dossier comprised of supportive material including letters of recommendation, along with additional pertinent materials.
Read more on humanitarian award here https://brainly.com/question/27537646
#SPJ1
What is liberty
The ability t
Liberty is a broad and complex concept that encompasses many aspects of human life, such as political, social and economic liberty.
What informs the types of liberty?Liberty is the state of being free from oppressive or arbitrary restrictions imposed by others. Political liberty includes the ability of individuals to participate in the political process, express their opinions, and vote without fear of persecution or coercion.
Social liberty means the freedom to associate with others, to form and express cultural or religious beliefs, and to pursue personal interests without discrimination.
Economic liberty means freedom to trade, own property, and engage in economic activity without undue interference or regulation from governments or other parties.
learn more about liberty: https://brainly.com/question/19551596
#SPJ1
What events, (natural or man-made) do you think has to happen for the success of the 20s to come crashing down? Explain and defend your response.
Various potential events, natural and man-made, could derail or hinder 2020s' achievements.
Some of the events includesGlobal Economic Worsening: A strict global financial slump or depression would have a highly-devastating influence on multiple fields and locations, resulting in massive unemployment, financial fragility, and stunted economic increase.
Natural Calamities: Substantial natural catastrophes, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, wildfires, or pandemics, could spark immense casualties, damage to property, and economical commotion.
Climatic Change Effects: Becoming more oppressive and frequent impacts of climate mutation, such as harsh meteorological occurrences, swelling sea levels, or ecological fluxes, could generate serious results for economies, foodformation, framework, and social sturdiness, initiating widespread turbulences and unsteadiness.
Learn more about man-made events at
https://brainly.com/question/2164887
#SPJ1
These armored warriors from Feudal Europe followed the code of chivalry.
A. Knights
B. Samurai
C. Ninja
D. Vikings
Answer:
THE ANSWER IS A KNIGHT KNIGHT KNIGHT KNIGHT
Explanation:
I GOT IT RIGHT ON TEST
Which tool has been the de facto standard IDS engine since its creation in 1998?
A. Squid
B. Snort
C. Bro
D. Suricata
I need help right now please
I need answers thanks you!
Student lobbyists are individuals who engage in advocacy and lobbying efforts on behalf of student interests and issues. They may work for organizations that represent student interests, such as student unions or advocacy groups.
Student lobbyists work to influence public policy and decision-making processes at various levels of government, from local school boards to state and federal legislatures.
They may work to promote increased funding for education, advocate for changes to education policies, or work to protect the rights and interests of students.
Learn more about Student lobbyists, here
https://brainly.com/question/31173581
#SPJ1
How can Hawai'i secure a better future?
Why does Hawai'i continue to be a Democratic Party state?
write a "Meeting of the Minds" script between a union leader, a Nisei veteran, and a modern-day Hawai'i voter as they discuss why Hawai'i continues to be a Democratic Party state.
Hawaii has a history of being a Democratic Party state. The Democratic Party in Hawaii was formed in 1900 by supporters of Queen Liliʻuokalani ¹. One reason for Democrats' success in Hawaii is because they can remind voters of the state’s past as what can only bluntly be called a racist, white supremacist oligarchy controlled by a dovetailing of economic interests (the formerly dominant sugar and pineapple industry interests) along with the then political power, the Republican Party which largely controlled the Legislature and governorship ⁴.
Here's a "Meeting of the Minds" script between a union leader, a Nisei veteran, and a modern-day Hawai'i voter:
Union Leader: Aloha friends! It's great to see you both here today.
Nisei Veteran: Aloha! Yes, it's always good to get together and talk story.
Modern-day Hawai'i Voter: Definitely. So, what's on your mind today?
Union Leader: Well, I was thinking about how Hawaii continues to be a Democratic Party state. What do you think are the reasons for that?
Nisei Veteran: I think one reason is because of our history. The Democratic Party in Hawaii was formed by supporters of Queen Liliʻuokalani ¹. And Democrats can remind voters of the state’s past as what can only bluntly be called a racist, white supremacist oligarchy controlled by economic interests along with the then political power, the Republican Party ⁴.
Modern-day Hawai'i Voter: Yes, that's definitely one reason. And I think another reason is because the Democratic Party’s dominance makes it a big-tent party. This makes its ideological center of gravity relatively moderate, enabling establishment politicians to resist the kinds of progressive revolts seen in many other strongly blue states ³.
Union Leader: That's a good point. And I think another reason is because of our strong union presence here in Hawaii. The Democratic Party has always been supportive of labor rights and worker protections.
Nisei Veteran: Yes, that's definitely true. And I think all these reasons combined help explain why Hawaii continues to be a Democratic Party state.
Modern-day Hawai'i Voter: Agreed. It's interesting to think about how our history and current political landscape shape our voting patterns.
Union Leader: Definitely. It's important to understand these things so we can continue to make informed decisions at the ballot box.
MARK ME BRAINLEISTPLEASE HURRY!!! IT'S AN ESSAY!!!... Whoever's right gets brainliest!!! 20 Points!!
Rough Draft
Prompt:
Did the New Deal effectively provide relief to Americans during the Great Depression? Historians and economists still disagree over the answer to this question. Read the four articles provided here to learn more about both sides of the argument. Determine your viewpoint on this topic and develop a claim.
Write an essay to present an argument that either accepts or rejects the claim that the New Deal effectively provided relief during the Great Depression. Your argument should include a clear claim, logical reasons, and accurate data and other relevant evidence. It should also include, and rebut, a counterclaim.
The Great Depression was a global economic shock that affected the majority of nations. It was a time of economic slump that became apparent following a significant decline in American stock prices. The Wall Street stock market crash of October 24 was caused by the economic contagion, which started around September.
The 1929 stock market crash, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff's impact on global trade, government policies, bank failures, panics, and the depletion of the money supply are a few of the explanations cited for the Great Depression.
The New York Stock Exchange's stocks lost 50% of their value in ten weeks in 1929, signaling the start of the Great Depression. As equities kept declining in the early.
Learn more about the Great Depression here:
https://brainly.com/question/29771180
#SPJ1
Where they true to their pledge of life,
fortune, and sacred honor? Give three
reasons why or why not: James Wilson
The Reasons why James Wilson was genuine to his promise are:
He gambled his life and fortune by marking the Announcement of Freedom, knowing that the British government would consider it an act of conspiracy. He was hence detained and misplaced much of his riches amid the war.
What are the pledges?Others are:
He kept on serve the country after the war, making a difference to draft the Joined together States Structure and serving as a equity on the primary United States Preeminent Court.
Lastly, He accepted within the standards of freedom and popular government, and worked energetically to advance them all through his life.
Learn more about pledge from
https://brainly.com/question/2034889
#SPJ1
the 1973 cease fire agreement that ended the vietnam war did not adequately protect south vietnam
true or false?
Answer:
i belive its true just not 100 on i tho
Explanation:
"The more power a government has, the more it can act arbitrarily according to the whims and desires of the elite, and the more it will make war on others and murder its foreign and domestic subjects. The more constrained the power of governments, the more power is diffused, checked, and balanced, the less it will aggress on others and commit mass violence. At the extremes of power, totalitarian governments slaughter their people by the tens of millions. In contrast, many democracies can barely bring themselves to execute even serial murderers. "
-Rudolph Rummel, United States political scientist, Death by Government, 1994
Identify ONE historical example of mass violence that was committed by a totalitarian state in the twentieth century that would support Rummel’s argument in the passage.
Explain ONE historical example of a democratic state committing mass violence that would challenge Rummel’s argument regarding democracies and mass violence.
Explain ONE development in the late twentieth century that likely shaped Rummel’s view of the relationship between democracy and mass violence
As per the given passage, an example of mass violence is the Holocaust, and an example that would challenge is the Vietnam War.
Rummel's claim is supported by Holocaust, which was committed by Nazi Germany during World War II, as one historical instance of widespread brutality carried out by a totalitarian regime. Many Jews and other marginalized groups were slaughtered in concentration camps as part of state's genocidal policy under Adolf Hitler's dictatorial government. This case demonstrates, how a government with uncontrolled power and authority may utilize that power arbitrarily to perpetrate mass murder against its own people.
Rummel's claim would be refuted by past instances of democratic states engaging in mass murder, such as the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War. Many Vietnamese citizens and troops from both sides died during the United States' protracted and bloody involvement in the Vietnam War.
Rummel's perspective on connection among democracy and mass violence was probably impacted by developments in late 20th century, including democratisation, which propagated democratic institutions and values. Rummel may have seen the rise in the number of nations embracing democratic systems of governance in latter half as proof that democracies are less likely than totalitarian powers to engage in mass atrocities.
Read more about Holocaust on:
https://brainly.com/question/23352494
#SPJ4
Which of the following accurately summarizes the United States' involvement and military
role in World War I? (1 point)
O
The U.S. became involved in World War I after the Zimmermann Telegram, and sent troops to
provided military reinforcements and support.
O
The U.S. became involved in World War I when the Selective Service Act was passed, which
provided Allied forces military support.
O
The U.S. became involved in World War I on January 16, 1917, when Germany sunk a British
vessel and the U.S. sent economic support as a response.
The U.S. became involved after the ammunition depot attacks in New Jersey and New York,
but did not send troops until 1916 when Russia left the war.
Please give this a thanks, a rating, and/or a Brainliest rating if this helped you
Answer
The first one
Explanation
"The U.S. became involved in World War I after the Zimmermann Telegram, and sent troops to provided military reinforcements and support."
The United States initially remained neutral during World War I, but after Germany's attempt to form an alliance with Mexico through the Zimmermann Telegram was intercepted by British intelligence, the U.S. declared war on Germany in April 1917. The U.S. military provided significant reinforcements and support to the Allies, including soldiers, weapons, and supplies. American troops played a crucial role in several major battles, ultimately helping to tip the balance in favor of the Allies and leading to the end of the war in 1918.
The other statements in the question are incorrect. The Selective Service Act was passed in 1917, after the U.S. had already declared war on Germany. The sinking of the British vessel by Germany in 1917 was one of several events that led to the U.S. entry into the war, but it was not the only reason. There were no ammunition depot attacks in New Jersey and New York, and Russia left the war in 1917, not 1916.