Un televisor costaba $1250 y al comprarlo nos han hecho un 20% de descuento ¿cuánto nos han descontado?

The producer’s risk is 0.99 and the consumer’s risks for each sampling plan are 0.347, 0.049, and 0.176 for acceptance criteria 0, acceptance criteria 1, and acceptance criteria 2 respectively.

a. The operating characteristic curve (OC curve) shows the probability of accepting a lot with a given quality level, based on the sample size and acceptance criteria. Here are the OC curves for acceptance criteria of 0, 1, and 2, assuming a binomial distribution:

Acceptance Criteria = 0:
Sample size: 20
Probability of acceptance (p): 0.01
Probability of rejection (1-p): 0.99
OC Curve:
Quality Level (proportion defective) | Probability of acceptance
0% | 0.994
1% | 0.988
2% | 0.977
3% | 0.958
4% | 0.928
5% | 0.883
6% | 0.821
7% | 0.743
8% | 0.653
9% | 0.556
10% | 0.458

Acceptance Criteria = 1:
Sample size: 20
Probability of acceptance (p): 0.92
Probability of rejection (1-p): 0.08
OC Curve:
Quality Level (proportion defective) | Probability of acceptance
0% | 1.000
1% | 1.000
2% | 1.000
3% | 1.000
4% | 1.000
5% | 1.000
6% | 0.999
7% | 0.998
8% | 0.993
9% | 0.981
10% | 0.951

Acceptance Criteria = 2:
Sample size: 20
Probability of acceptance (p): 0.83
Probability of rejection (1-p): 0.17
OC Curve:
Quality Level (proportion defective) | Probability of acceptance
0% | 1.000
1% | 1.000
2% | 1.000
3% | 1.000
4% | 0.999
5% | 0.998
6% | 0.992
7% | 0.978
8% | 0.949
9% | 0.898
10% | 0.824

b. The producer's risk (Type I error) is the probability of rejecting a good lot, while the consumer's risk (Type II error) is the probability of accepting a bad lot. Here are the calculations for each sampling plan:

Acceptance Criteria = 0:
Producer's risk = α = 1 - p0 = 0.99
Consumer's risk = β = 1 - OC at p1 = 1 - 0.653 = 0.347

Acceptance Criteria = 1:
Producer's risk = α = 1 - p0 = 0.99
Consumer's risk = β = 1 - OC at p1 = 1 - 0.951 = 0.049

Acceptance Criteria = 2:

Producer's risk = α = 1 - p0 = 0.99
Consumer's risk = β = 1 - OC at p1 = 1 - 0.824 = 0.176

Note that the producer's risk is the same for all three sampling plans since it is based on the specified probability of a defective unit in the lot. The consumer's risk, however, varies depending on the acceptance criteria and sample size. Generally, a more lenient acceptance criterion (higher p-value) or a larger sample size will result in lower consumer risk.

To know more about the binomial distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31197941

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

You are given $  and  cartons and you want  $/carton

$ 48 / 12 cartons =  $ 4 / carton    <====unit rate

Answer:

D. 13.34

Step-by-Step Explanation:

distance formula

[tex]d=\sqrt{(x2-x1)^2 +(y2-y1)^2} \\d=\sqrt{(6-3)^2 +(9-(-4))^2} \\d=\sqrt{178}[/tex]

Answer: The probability of picking a red candy is 14/63, the probability of picking a blue candy is 14/63, the probability of picking a green candy is 9/63, the probability of picking a brown candy is 15/63, the probability of picking an orange candy is 3/63, and the probability of picking a yellow candy is 8/63. These probabilities can be calculated by dividing the number of candies of each color by the total number of candies in the bag.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: vvvvv

Step-by-step explanation:

The odds of getting a green M&M can be calculated by dividing the number of green M&M candies by the total number of candies in the bag.

Number of green M&Ms = 9

Total number of candies = 14 + 14 + 9 + 15 + 3 + 8 = 63

Odds of getting a green M&M = Number of green M&Ms / Total number of candies

Odds of getting a green M&M = 9/63 = 1/7

The probability of getting a green M&M can be calculated by dividing the number of green M&M candies by the total number of candies in the bag.

Probability of getting a green M&M = Number of green M&Ms / Total number of candies

Probability of getting a green M&M = 9/63 = 0.14285714285714285 or approximately 14.29% (rounded to two decimal places).

Also thanks a lot, now i want m&m's

The term that must be added to the equation to make it a perfect square is 9, which makes the option D correct.

We have to apply completing the square method to know the term to be added as follows:

For the equation;

x² + 6x = 1

we first divide the coefficient of x by 2;

6/2 = 3

then we square the result;

3² = 9

and then add 9 to both sides of the equation to make it a perfect square

x² + 6x + 9 = 1 + 9

(x + 3)² = 10.

Therefore, the term that must be added to the equation to make it a perfect square is 9.

Read more about square here:https://brainly.com/question/8665569

#SPJ1

The diameter of the headlight's opening is 4 inches.

To find the diameter of the headlight's opening, we need to determine the distance between the two points on the paraboloid where the depth is 2 inches.

Using the formula for the paraboloid of revolution, we know that the equation for the shape of the headlight is:
[tex]y^2 = 4px[/tex]

where p is the distance from the vertex to the focus. In this case, p = 1 inch.

To find the distance between two points on the paraboloid where the depth is 2 inches, we can set y = ±2 and solve for x:

[tex]4p^2 = 4x(\pm2)\\x = p^2/\pm1[/tex]

Since we're interested in the distance between two points, we can subtract the two x-values:

[tex]x^2 - x^1 = p^{2/1} - p^{2/-1}\\x^2 - x^1 = 2p^2[/tex]
Substituting in the value of p, we get:

x2 - x1 = 2(1^2) = 2

So the distance between the two points where the depth is 2 inches is 2 inches.

To find the diameter of the headlight's opening, we need to double this distance and then multiply by the focal length:

d = 2(2)(1) = 4 inches

Therefore, the diameter of the headlight's opening is 4 inches.

learn more about diameter

https://brainly.com/question/30428141

#SPJ11

To assign the sum of extra credit received to the total extra credit, you need to follow these steps:

1. Make a list of all the test grades, and mark the ones that have extra credit with a "+" sign. For example, if the test scores are: 95, 110+, 80, 120+, 100, you would mark the 110+ and the 120+.

2. Add up all the extra credit marks. In this example, that would be 110 + 120 = 230.

3. Count the number of extra credit marks. In this example, there are two.

4. Multiply the number of extra credit marks by the maximum extra credit value. If full credit is 100, then the maximum extra credit value is the amount that a student can exceed the maximum score by. In this case, that would be 20 (since 120 - 100 = 20). So, 2 x 20 = 40.

5. Add the extra credit value to the total score. In this example, the total score is 505 (95 + 110 + 80 + 120 + 100). So, you would add 40 to that to get 545.

Therefore, the answer is: To assign sum extra with the total extra credit received given list test grades, you need to add the extra credit value to the total score by multiplying the number of extra credit marks by the maximum extra credit value, and then adding that value to the total score.

To learn more about sum : brainly.com/question/29478473

#SPJ11

Answer:

-3 times n+7>-17

Step-by-step explanation:

The location of S" after translating and rotating the rectangle is (-3, -4).

To find the location of S" after translating and rotating the rectangle, we need to follow the two steps in order:

Translation: Apply the rule (x, y) → (x − 2, y − 4) to each vertex of the rectangle to get its new location. The new vertices are:

S'(-4, -3), T'(-4, -1), U'(-2, -1), V'(-2, -3)

Rotation: Rotate the translated rectangle 90° counterclockwise. This means that each vertex will swap its x and y coordinates and the new x-coordinate will be negated. The new vertices after rotation are:

S"(-3, -4), T"(-1, -4), U"( -1, -2), V"(-3, -2)

Therefore, the location of S" is (-3, -4).

To learn more about rectangle follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/28993977

#SPJ1

Part(a),

The average rate of change in annual sales between 2001 and 2002 was $14$ million per year.

Part(b),

The average rate of change in annual sales between 2001 and 2004 was a decrease of $3.33$ million per year.

a) To find the rate of change between 2001 and 2002, we need to calculate the difference in sales between those two years and divide it by the number of years:

Rate of change = (Sales in 2002 - Sales in 2001) / (2002 - 2001)

Rate of change = (255 - 241) / 1 = 14 million/year

Therefore, the average rate of change of annual sales between 2001 and 2002 was $14$ million per year.

b) To find the rate of change between 2001 and 2004, we need to calculate the difference in sales between those two years and divide it by the number of years:

Rate of change = (Sales in 2004 - Sales in 2001) / (2004 - 2001)

Rate of change = (231 - 241) / 3 = -3.33 million/year

Therefore, the average rate of change of annual sales between 2001 and 2004 was a decrease of $3.33$ million per year.

To know more about the average rate of change follow

https://brainly.com/question/28634752

#SPJ1

A Class A defect is considered very serious and will most likely cause operating failure.

Designed experiments are important tools for optimizing processes, identifying interactions among variables, and reducing variation in processes.

We have,

A Class A defect is typically the most severe type of defect in a manufacturing or quality control context.

It usually means that a product or component has a flaw that is likely to cause it to fail in normal use or operation, posing a significant risk to safety or functionality.

Designed experiments, also known as DOE (Design of Experiments), are a commonly used statistical tool in process optimization and improvement.

They involve careful planning and executing a series of controlled tests or trials to systematically investigate the effects of different process variables or factors on a given output or response variable.

Thus,
A Class A defect is considered very serious and will most likely cause operating failure. Designed experiments are important tools for optimizing processes, identifying interactions among variables, and reducing variation in processes.

Learn more about designed experiments here:

https://brainly.com/question/639672

#SPJ11

The probability that there is one or less theft in a minute is 0.09161 or 9.161%.

To find the probability that there is one or less theft in a minute, given that recent crime reports indicate that 4.0 motor vehicle thefts occur each minute in the USA, we can use the Poisson probability distribution formula.

The Poisson probability formula is:
P(x) = (e^(-λ) * λ^x) / x!

where λ (lambda) represents the average rate of occurrences (4.0 thefts per minute in this case), x is the number of occurrences we're interested in (0 or 1 theft), and e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828).

We want to find the probability of having 0 or 1 theft, so we'll calculate the probabilities for x=0 and x=1, and then add them together.

For x = 0:
P(0) = (e^(-4) * 4^0) / 0! = (0.01832 * 1) / 1 = 0.01832

For x = 1:
P(1) = (e^(-4) * 4^1) / 1! = (0.01832 * 4) / 1 = 0.07329

Now, we add the probabilities together:
P(0 or 1 theft) = P(0) + P(1) = 0.01832 + 0.07329 = 0.09161

So, the probability that there is one or less theft in a minute, given the Poisson distribution, is approximately 0.09161 or 9.161%.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

If two samples from the same population have the same mean and are both n = 100, they will probably still have different sample variances.

We have,

If two samples from the same population have the same mean and are both n=100, they will probably still have different sample variances.

This is because sample variance refers to the dispersion or spread of data points within each individual sample, and this can vary even if the samples have the same mean and sample size (n=100).

It's important to note that the other options (t-statistics, standard errors, and alpha values) are related to the sampling distribution or hypothesis testing, which may not be different simply due to having the same mean and sample size.

Thus,

If two samples from the same population have the same mean and are both n = 100, they will probably still have different sample variances.

Learn more about sample variances here:

https://brainly.com/question/31255543

#SPJ11

(a) The box can be represented as a population of 200,000 registered voters, with 120,000 of them supporting the ballot proposition and 80,000 opposing it. Each voter can be represented by a ticket, and the box would contain 120,000 tickets labeled "Support" and 80,000 tickets labeled "Oppose."

(b) If we drew 200 times with replacement from this box, there is a 95% chance that the sum of draws (number of voters contacted who support the ballot proposition) would be between 106 and 134. Expressed as a percentage of the 200 people, this is between 53% and 67%.

(a) The box can be represented as a collection of 200,000 balls, where each ball corresponds to a registered voter. Among these, 120,000 balls are labeled as "support" to indicate that the voter supports the ballot proposition, and the remaining 80,000 balls are labeled as "oppose" to indicate that the voter does not support the proposition. When we randomly select 200 voters without replacement and count the number of supporters among them, we are essentially drawing 200 balls from this box without replacement and counting the number of balls labeled as "support".

(b) Since we are drawing with replacement, each draw is independent and has a Bernoulli distribution with a probability of success p = 0.6 (since 60% of the voters support the proposition). The sum of these draws has a binomial distribution with parameters n = 200 (the number of trials) and p = 0.6 (the probability of success). The mean of this distribution is μ = np = 200 x 0.6 = 120, and the standard deviation is σ = sqrt(np(1-p)) = sqrt(200 x 0.6 x 0.4) ≈ 7.75.

To find the range of values within which the sum of draws is likely to fall with 95% confidence, we can use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution, which is appropriate when np > 10 and n(1-p) > 10. In this case, we have np = 120 and n(1-p) = 80, so the normal approximation is valid.

We want to find the values of k such that P(μ - kσ < X < μ + kσ) = 0.95, where X is the sum of draws. Using the standard normal distribution, we have:

P(-k < Z < k) = 0.95,

where Z = (X - μ)/σ is a standard normal variable. From standard normal tables, we find that k ≈ 1.96.

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the sum of draws is:

120 - 1.96 x 7.75 ≈ 104.1 to 120 + 1.96 x 7.75 ≈ 135.9.

As a percentage of the 200 people polled, this is between:

104.1/200 x 100 ≈ 52.05% and 135.9/200 x 100 ≈ 67.95%.

To know more about Bernoulli distribution refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30906879

#SPJ11

The surface with equation (y^2 + 1)e^z – (z^2 + 1)e^x + y^2z^2e^y = 0 can be parametrized as follows 1:

x = u

y = v

z = ln((v^2 + 1) / (u^2 + 1))

Parametrization of a surface is a mathematical technique used to describe a surface in terms of parameters. It involves expressing the coordinates of points on the surface as functions of two or more parameters. A common way to parametrize a surface is to use two parameters u and v to represent the coordinates of points on the surface. This is called a parametric representation or a parametric equation of the surface. Another way to parametrize a surface is to use a vector-valued function, which maps a point in a domain onto a point on the surface. Both of these techniques allow us to describe the surface in a way that is useful for mathematical analysis and visualization.

#SPJ11

Learn more about parametric representation of the surface:  https://brainly.com/question/24189086.

The legitimate probability distribution for the discrete random variable X is:

Value of x P(X= )

1 0.10

2 0.22

4 0.14

5 0.18

6 0.36

To create a legitimate probability distribution, the sum of all the probabilities should be equal to 1. So, we can use the fact that the sum of all probabilities must equal 1 to find the missing probability for X = 5.

Value of x P(X= )

1 0.10

2 0.22

4 0.14

5 ?

6 0.36

To find P(X = 5), we can subtract the sum of the probabilities for X = 1, 2, 4, and 6 from 1:

P(X = 5) = 1 - (0.10 + 0.22 + 0.14 + 0.36) = 0.18

Therefore, the legitimate probability distribution for the discrete random variable X is:

Value of x P(X= )

1 0.10

2 0.22

4 0.14

5 0.18

6 0.36

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

The measures of the following angles are; Angle 1 =44

Given that HC is the diameter of the circle, then:

HA = 83°, BC= 50°, HD = 135°, GF = 32°, HG = 45°, and FE = 55°

From the given figure, HC can be expressed as:

HC = HA + BC + AB

Substituting with HC = 180°, HA = 83°, and BC = 50°, and solving for AB:

180 = 83 + AB + 50

AB = 47

The relation between the angle outside the circle, ∠1, and the intersected arcs AB and HD are:

Angle = 1/2(HD - AB)

Substituting with HD = 135°, and AB = 47°:

Angle 1 = 1/2(135 - 47)

Angle 1 =44

Learn more about the circle;

https://brainly.com/question/29255833

#SPJ1

The annual interest savings is the amount Toni would save each year in interest charges due to the lower APR. It would be around  0.375%

Let x be the original APR. Then the first purchase of a point reduced the APR to x - 0.125%, the second point reduced it further to x - 0.25%, and the third point reduced it to x - 0.375%. Since Toni's new APR is 3.2%, we have:

x - 0.375% = 3.2%

Solving for x, we get:

x = 3.2% + 0.375% = 3.575%

Therefore, Toni's original APR was 3.575%.

To check our answer, we can use the fact that Toni purchased 3 points at a cost of 1% each. Since her loan value is the total cost of the points ($8,100) divided by the cost per percent (1%), we have:

loan value = $8,100 / 1% = $810,000

The reduction in APR due to the 3 points is 0.375%, which is equivalent to a reduction in the annual interest rate of:

0.375% / 100% = 0.00375

The annual interest savings due to the reduction in APR is then:

$810,000 x 0.00375 = $3,037.50

The annual interest savings is the amount Toni would save each year in interest charges due to the lower APR. Dividing this by the loan value gives us the actual reduction in APR:

$3,037.50 / $810,000 = 0.00375 = 0.375%

This confirms that our answer for the original APR is correct.

To know more about interest here

https://brainly.com/question/25720319

#SPJ4

The probability that the first student is a boy and the second student is a girl is 7/26.

To answer your question, we'll need to calculate the probabilities for each event and then multiply them together.

Probability of selecting a boy first:
There are 7 boys and 13 students total (7 boys + 6 girls), so the probability is 7/13.

Probability of selecting a girl second:
After selecting a boy, there are now 12 students remaining (6 boys + 6 girls). The probability of selecting a girl is 6/12 (which simplifies to 1/2).

Now, multiply the probabilities together: (7/13) × (1/2) = 7/26

So, the probability that the first student is a boy and the second student is a girl is 7/26.

To learn more about probability here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The critical F-value (3.098), we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the mean amount of snowfall for the four regions.

To learn

To test whether there is a significant difference between the mean amount of snowfall for the four regions, we can use a one-way ANOVA test. The null hypothesis for this test is that the mean amount of snowfall is the same for all four regions, while the alternative hypothesis is that at least one region has a significantly different mean amount of snowfall than the others.

To begin, we can calculate the sample means and sample standard deviations for each region:

Region 1: Mean = 3.10, SD = 0.283

Region 2: Mean = 3.00, SD = 0.418

Region 3: Mean = 2.57, SD = 0.182

Region 4: Mean = 3.09, SD = 0.499

Next, we can calculate the overall mean and overall variance of the sample data:

Overall mean = (3.10 + 3.00 + 2.57 + 3.09) / 4 = 2.94

Overall variance = (([tex]0.283^2[/tex] + 0.418^2 + [tex]0.182^2[/tex] + [tex]0.499^2[/tex]) / 3) / 4 = 0.00937

Using these values, we can calculate the F-statistic for the one-way ANOVA test:

F = (Between-group variability) / (Within-group variability)

Between-group variability = Sum of squares between groups / degrees of freedom between groups

Within-group variability = Sum of squares within groups / degrees of freedom within groups

Degrees of freedom between groups = k - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3

Degrees of freedom within groups = N - k = 20 - 4 = 16

Sum of squares between groups = (n1 * (x1bar - overall_mean)[tex]^2[/tex] + n2 * (x2bar - overall_mean)[tex]^2[/tex] + n3 * (x3bar - overall_mean)[tex]^2[/tex] + n4 * (x4bar - overall_mean)[tex]^2[/tex]) / (k - 1)

= ((9 * (3.10 - 2.94)[tex]^2[/tex] + 9 * (3.00 - 2.94)[tex]^2[/tex] + 7 * (2.57 - 2.94)[tex]^2[/tex] + 3 * (3.09 - 2.94)[tex]^2[/tex]) / 3

= 3.602

Sum of squares within groups = (n1 - 1) * s[tex]1^2[/tex] + (n2 - 1) * s[tex]2^2[/tex] + (n3 - 1) * s[tex]3^2[/tex] + (n4 - 1) * s[tex]4^2[/tex]

= (8 *[tex]0.283^2[/tex] + 8 * 0.[tex]418^2[/tex] + 6 * [tex]0.182^2[/tex] + 2 * [tex]0.499^2[/tex])

= 1.055

F = (Between-group variability) / (Within-group variability) = 3.602 / 1.055 = 3.415

We can then use an F-distribution table or calculator to find the critical F-value for a significance level of 0.05, with degrees of freedom between groups = 3 and degrees of freedom within groups = 16. The critical F-value is 3.098.

Since our calculated F-value (3.415) is greater than the critical F-value (3.098), we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the mean amount of snowfall for the four regions.

To learn more about significant visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2284168

#SPJ11

The Mean Value Theorem applies over the interval (-5, 5) and (5, ∞).

To determine the interval(s) where the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) applies for the function y=√(x^2-25), we need to ensure that the function is continuous and differentiable on the given interval.

1. The function is continuous when the expression under the square root is non-negative, which means x^2-25≥0. Solving for x, we get x≥5 or x≤-5. In interval notation, the domain for continuity is (-∞,-5] U [5,∞).

2. To check for differentiability, we need to find the derivative of the function. The derivative of y=√(x^2-25) is:

y' = (1/2)(x^2-25)^(-1/2) * 2x
y' = x/√(x^2-25)

Now, we need to ensure that the derivative is defined on the given interval. Since x=5 or x=-5 makes the denominator zero, we should exclude these points. Hence, the interval for differentiability is (-∞,-5) U (5,∞).

Since the MVT requires both continuity and differentiability, the applicable interval(s) for the Mean Value Theorem are (-∞,-5) U (5,∞).

To learn more about Mean value theorem : brainly.com/question/30403137

#SPJ11

Therefore, any equation of the form y = kx, where k is a constant, has the same constant of proportionality as the equation y = (1/3)x.

Proportionality, equivalence between two ratios in mathematics. A and B are in the same ratio as C and D in the formula a/b = c/d. When one of a proportion's four quantities is unknown, a proportion is often built up to resolve the word problem.  

According to the principle of proportionality, any incidental human casualties and property damage must not outweigh the tangible benefits to the military that may be expected from the destruction of a military objective.

The equation y = (1/3)x represents a proportional relationship between y and x with a constant of proportionality of 1/3.

Any equation of the form y = kx, where k is a constant, represents a proportional relationship between y and x with a constant of proportionality of k.

Learn more about proportionality visit: brainly.com/question/24868934

#SPJ4

The required, monthly payment on the loan would be $84.00.

To calculate the simple interest on a loan, we use the formula:

Simple Interest = Principal * Interest Rate * Time

In this case, the Principal is $1800, the Interest Rate is 6% (or 0.06 as a decimal), and the Time is 2 years. So, the simple interest on the loan would be:

Simple Interest = $1800 * 0.06 * 2 = $216

To calculate the monthly payments, we need to add the interest to the principal and divide by the number of months in the loan term. Since the loan term is 2 years or 24 months, the monthly payment would be:

Monthly Payment = (Principal + Simple Interest) / Number of Months

= ($1800 + $216) / 24

= $84.00

Therefore, the monthly payment on the loan would be $84.00.

Learn more about simple interests here:

https://brainly.com/question/26457073

#SPJ1

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

starting with the "top floor" :

3 single small triangles.

then the left 2 combined and the right 2 combined.

and then all 3 combined.

that is 3 + 2 + 1 = 6 triangles.

now we extend the triangles from the top floor to the next floor below.

we have the same number of triangles, they are just longer.

6 triangles there.

and we extend the triangles to the next floor below.

we have again the same number of triangles, they are just even longer.

6 triangles there.

and we extend the triangles to the next (and last) floor below.

we have again the same number of triangles, they are just very long.

6 triangles there.

that makes for the 4 floors

6×4 = 24 triangles.

The graph of the function is given above.

The graph of the function f(x) = x + 3x + 2 is a parabola that opens upwards.

We have,

The graph of the function f(x) = x + 3x + 2 is a parabola.

The coefficient of x² is positive, so the parabola opens upwards.

To sketch the graph of the function, we can use the vertex formula.

The x-coordinate of the vertex is given by -b/2a, where a and b are the coefficients of x^2 and x, respectively.

In this case, a = 1 and b = 3, so the x-coordinate of the vertex is -3/2.

To find the y-coordinate of the vertex, we can substitute this value of x into the function to get:

f(-3/2) = (-3/2)^2 + 3(-3/2) + 2 = 1/4 - 9/2 + 2 = -15/4

So the vertex is at (-3/2, -15/4).

We can also find the y-intercept by setting x = 0:

f(0) = 0² + 3(0) + 2 = 2

So the y-intercept is at (0, 2).

Thus,

The graph of the function is given below.

Learn more about functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/28533782

#SPJ1

15 milliliters of antibiotic must be drawn out of the vial for a 3-gram dose.

To determine how many milliliters of the antibiotic must be drawn out of the vial for a 3-gram dose, follow these steps:

1. Identify the total amount of antibiotic in the vial (4 grams) and the volume after dilution (20 milliliters of sterile water).
2. Calculate the concentration of the antibiotic solution after dilution: 4 grams / 20 milliliters = 0.2 grams/mL.
3. Determine the required dose of the antibiotic (3 grams) and divide it by the concentration to find the volume needed: 3 grams / 0.2 grams/mL = 15 milliliters.

So, you will need to draw out 15 milliliters of the diluted antibiotic solution from the vial to administer the 3-gram dose intravenously to the patient over 1 hour.

Learn more about concentration here:

https://brainly.com/question/31587441

#SPJ11

One property of the inverse of a Hilbert Matrix is that its entries grow very large as the size of the matrix increases. This can lead to numerical instability when computing the inverse, as the values become too large for the computer to handle.

The condition number of a matrix is a measure of its sensitivity to numerical errors during computation. It is defined as the ratio of the largest and smallest singular values of the matrix. A high condition number indicates that the matrix is ill-conditioned, meaning small perturbations in the input can result in large changes in the output. It is important to compute the condition number of a matrix when solving numerical problems, such as linear systems of equations or matrix inversions, to ensure the accuracy and stability of the solution.
Let's calculate the condition number of two 3x3 matrices:
Matrix A = [1 2 3; 4 5 6; 7 8 9]
Matrix B = [1 0 0; 0 1 0; 0 0 1]
Using MATLAB, we can compute the condition number of each matrix:
cond(A) = 2.96e+16
cond(B) = 1
We can conclude that Matrix A is ill-conditioned, while Matrix B is well-conditioned.
To create a Hilbert Matrix in MATLAB, we can use the hilb function. Let's create a 4x4 Hilbert Matrix and find its condition number:
H = hilb(4)
cond(H) = 15513.7387
We can see that the Hilbert Matrix is highly ill-conditioned.
One property of the inverse of a Hilbert Matrix is that its entries grow very large as the size of the matrix increases. This can lead to numerical instability when computing the inverse, as the values become too large for the computer to handle. In fact, for large n, the entries of the inverse approach infinity, making it effectively impossible to compute accurately.

Learn more about Hilbert matrix here, https://brainly.com/question/11989522

#SPJ11

Answer:

3(a-0.3')^2 -5.3'

Step-by-step explanation:

you can factorized as i explaind you in the pic