To solve 10 1/2 Min thinks of dividing a piece of paper into 2 equal parts, dividing one of those parts into 10 equal pieces, and then coloring one of those pieces.

What fraction of the paper is Min thinking about coloring?
Enter your answer as a fraction in simplest form by filling in the boxes

Answer:

15 Pi m

Step-by-step explanation:

arc ADC = 360 Degrees - 60 Degrees divided by 360 Degrees Multiplied by 2 Pi Multiplied by 9

= 5/6 Times 18 Pi

 =15 Pi m

To find the orthogonal trajectories of the given family of curves, we first need to understand what the term "orthogonal" means. In simple terms, two lines or curves are said to be orthogonal if they intersect at a right angle. Now, coming back to the problem, the given family of curves can be written as x^2 - 2y^2 = c, where c is a constant.

To find the orthogonal trajectories, we need to differentiate this equation with respect to y, treating x as a constant. This gives us:
-4xy = dy/dx

Now, we need to find the equation of the curves that intersect the given family of curves at a right angle, i.e., the slopes of the curves must be negative reciprocals of each other. Therefore, we can write:
dy/dx = 4xy/k

where k is a constant. To solve this differential equation, we can separate the variables and integrate:

∫dy/4xy = ∫dx/k

ln|y| - ln|x^2| = ln|c| + ln|k|

ln|y/x^2| = ln|ck|

y/x^2 = ±ck

Therefore, the orthogonal trajectories of the given family of curves are given by y = ±kx^2/c, where k is a constant. These curves intersect the original family of curves at right angles.

1. Identify the family of curves: The given equation is x^2 + 2y^2 = c, where c is a constant. This represents a family of ellipses with different sizes depending on the value of c.

2. Calculate the derivative: To find the orthogonal trajectories, we first need to find the derivative of the given equation with respect to x. Differentiate both sides with respect to x:

d/dx(x^2) + d/dx(2y^2) = d/dx(c)
2x + 4yy' = 0

3. Find the orthogonal slope: The slope of the orthogonal trajectory is the negative reciprocal of the original slope. Since the original slope is y', the orthogonal slope is -1/y':

Orthogonal slope = -1/y'

4. Replace the original slope with the orthogonal slope:

2x + 4y(-1/y') = 0

5. Solve for y':

y' = -2x/(4y)

6. Solve the differential equation: Now we have a first-order differential equation to find the equation of the orthogonal trajectories:

dy/dx = -2x/(4y)

Separate variables and integrate both sides:

∫(1/y) dy = ∫(-2x/4) dx

ln|y| = -x^2/4 + k

7. Solve for y:

y = e^(-x^2/4 + k) = C * e^(-x^2/4), where C is a new constant.

The orthogonal trajectories of the given family of curves are represented by the equation y = C * e^(-x^2/4).

Learn more about orthogonal at : brainly.com/question/2292926

#SPJ11

The equation of the graph is determined as y - 1 = 5x/3.

The equation of the graph is calculated by applying the general equation of a line form.

y = mx + c

where;

The slope of the graph is calculated as follows;

m = Δy/Δx

m = (y₂ - y₁ ) / (x₂ - x₁ )

m = ( -4 - 1 ) / (3 - 0)

m = -5/3

y = -5x/3 + 1

y - 1 = 5x/3

Learn more about equation of line here: https://brainly.com/question/13763238

#SPJ1

Answer:

Point C is in the second quadrant. C is the correct answer.

It would take around 8 hours to bring each lake's pollution level down to 50% of its starting point, and around 22 hours to bring it down to 5%.

Assuming each lake is a separate tank with only clean water flowing in, we can use the exponential decay model [tex]$A = A_0e^{-kt}$[/tex], where $A$ is the amount of pollutant at time t, A₀ is the initial amount of pollutant, and k is the decay constant.

To find the time it would take to reduce the pollution level in each lake to 50% of its original level, we need to solve the equation [tex]$0.5A_0 = A_0e^{-kt}$[/tex] for t:

[tex]0.5A_0 &= A_0e^{-kt} \\frac{0.5A_0}{A_0} &= e^{-kt} \\ln\left(\frac{0.5A_0}{A_0}\right) &= -kt \\ln(0.5) &= -kt \t &= \frac{\ln(0.5)}{-k}\end{align*}[/tex]

To find the time it would take to reduce the pollution level in each lake to 5% of its original level, we need to solve the equation[tex]$0.05A_0 = A_0e^{-kt}$[/tex] for t:

[tex]0.05A_0 &= A_0e^{-kt} \\frac{0.05A_0}{A_0} &= e^{-kt} \\ln\left(\frac{0.05A_0}{A_0}\right) &= -kt \\ln(0.05) &= -kt \t &= \frac{\ln(0.05)}{-k}\end{align*}[/tex]

The decay constant $k$ can be found by using the given information that each lake is replaced by clean water every 8 hours. This means that the half-life of the pollutant is 8 hours, which gives us:

[tex]0.5A_0 &= A_0e^{-k(8)} \\ln(0.5) &= -8k \k &= -\frac{\ln(0.5)}{8} \approx 0.08664\end{align*}[/tex]

Substituting this value of k into the equations we derived earlier, we get:

[tex]t_{50} = \frac{\ln(0.5)}{-k} \approx 8.006 \text{ hours}[/tex]

[tex]t_{5} &= \frac{\ln(0.05)}{-k} \approx 22.133 \text{ hours}[/tex]

Therefore, it would take approximately 8 hours to reduce the pollution level in each lake to 50% of its original level, and approximately 22 hours to reduce it to 5% of its original level.

Learn more question about lake pollution at https://brainly.com/question/16836119

#SPJ11

Answer:

Vertical angles are congruent, so the two triangles are congruent by AAS (Angle-Angle-Side).

None of the theorems listed can be used to show congruence.

A linear or exponential model would not model the relationship between the number of employees and number of customers

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

number of employees 1 2 3 4 10

number of customers 8 4 13 17 39

Testing a linear model

To do this, we calculate the difference between the y values

So, we have

13 - 4 = 4 - 8

9 = -4 ---- this is false

So, the function is not a linear function

Testing an exponential model

To do this, we calculate the ratio of the y values

So, we have

13/4 = 4/8

3.25 = 1/2 ---- this is false

So, the function is not an exponential function

Read more about functions at

https://brainly.com/question/4138300

#SPJ1

The quantity q(t) of a radioactive substance left at time t > 0 with a half-life of 3200 years can be found using the formula: q(t) =

[tex]q(0) * 0.5^(t/3200)[/tex]

after 6400 years, only 10 grams of the substance will be left. where q(0) is the initial quantity of the substance.

Given q(0) = 20 g, we can find q(t) for any time t > 0 using the formula above. For example, if we want to find q(6400) - the quantity of the substance left after 6400 years - we can substitute t = 6400 in the formula and get: q(6400) =

[tex]20 * 0.5^(6400/3200)[/tex]

= 10 g.

After 6400 years, only 10 grams of the substance will be left. It is important to note that the half-life of a radioactive substance is the time it takes for half of the substance to decay.

After one half-life (3200 years), the initial quantity of the substance will be reduced to half (10 g). After two half-lives (6400 years), it will be reduced to one-fourth (5 g), and so on.

Learn more about radioactive here:

https://brainly.com/question/1770619

#SPJ4

Answer:

To find the distance between two points, we can use the distance formula:

d = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)

where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the coordinates of the two points.

In this case, the two points are (3, 4) and (6, 8), so we have:

d = sqrt((6 - 3)^2 + (8 - 4)^2)

d = sqrt(3^2 + 4^2)

d = sqrt(9 + 16)

d = sqrt(25)

d = 5

Therefore, the distance between the points (3, 4) and (6, 8) is 5 units.

It's worth noting that the values 5√22 and √7 do not match the above

f(x) is concave down on the interval -5 ≤ x ≤ -6 and 0 ≤ x ≤ 6.

f(x) is concave up on the interval -6 ≤ x ≤ 0.

To determine where f(x) is concave up or concave down, we need to calculate the second derivative of f(x):

f(x) = x √([tex]x^2[/tex] + 36)

f'(x) = √[tex]x^2[/tex] + 36) + [tex]x^2[/tex] √([tex]x^2[/tex] + 36)

f''(x) = (x ([tex]x^2[/tex] +72) )/(([tex]x^2[/tex]+36)[tex]^(3[/tex]/2))

To find where f(x) is concave up or concave down, we need to find where f''(x) > 0 (concave up) or f''(x) < 0 (concave down).

f''(x) = 0 when x = 0 or x = +/-6.

Thus, f(x) is concave down on the interval -5 ≤ x ≤ -6 and 0 ≤ x ≤ 6, and concave up on the interval -6 ≤ x ≤ 0.

The inflection point for this function is at x = 0.

To find the minimum and maximum for this function, we need to look at the endpoints and critical points of the interval -5 ≤ x ≤ 6.

f(-5) = -5√61 and f(6) = 6√72, so the minimum occurs at x = -5 and the maximum occurs at x = 6.

Therefore:

f(x) is concave down on the interval -5 ≤ x ≤ -6 and 0 ≤ x ≤ 6.

f(x) is concave up on the interval -6 ≤ x ≤ 0.

The inflection point for this function is at x = 0.

The minimum for this function occurs at x = -5.

The maximum for this function occurs at x = 6.

To know more about   inflection point, here

https://brainly.com/question/25918847

#SPJ4

The ONB for the given plane in R3 is ū = [-5/√(26), 1/√(26), 0] and ī = [25/(√(26/13)), -5/(√(26/13)), 0].

To find an orthonormal basis for the plane x + 5y + 4z = 0, we first solve the system and get the parametric solution

x = -5t - 4s

y = t

z = s

Assigning parameters s and t to the free variables and writing the solution in vector form as su + tv, we get

[-5t - 4s, t, s] = t[-5, 1, 0] + s[-4, 0, 1]

Taking u = [-5, 1, 0] and v = [-4, 0, 1], we normalize u to have norm 1 by dividing it by its length

||u|| = √(26)

ū = [-5/√(26), 1/√(26), 0]

To find the component of v orthogonal to u, we take the dot product of v and u, and divide it by the dot product of u and u, and then multiply u by this scalar

v - ((v · u) / (u · u))u

v · u = -5

u · u = 26

v - (-5/26)[-5, 1, 0]

v - [25/26, -5/26, 0]

Finally, we normalize this vector to have norm 1

||v - proj_u v|| = √(26/13)

ī = [25/(2√(26/13)), -5/(2√(26/13)), 0]

Therefore, the orthonormal basis for the plane x + 5y + 4z = 0 is ū = [-5/√(26), 1/√(26), 0] and ī = [25/(√(26/13)), -5/(√(26/13)), 0].

To know more about orthonormal basis:

https://brainly.com/question/30882267

#SPJ4

The television researcher watched the Simpsons for 3 and 1/4 hours.

To find the number of hours the researcher watched the Simpsons, we need to use the given information that Bart makes a bad decision every 1/4 of an hour. This means that in one hour (or 4/4 of an hour), Bart makes 4 bad decisions.

To find how many hours the researcher watched, we can divide the number of bad decisions by 4:

13 bad decisions ÷ 4 bad decisions per hour = 3.25 hours

Therefore, the researcher watched the Simpsons for 3 and 1/4 hours.

Learn more about basic maths

https://brainly.com/question/14660509

#SPJ4

The number of hectares that the plane search is 129450 hectares

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

A search plane covers 50 square miles of countryside

This means that

Area = 50 square miles of countryside

As a general rule

1 square miles = 258.999 hectares

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

50 * 1 square miles = 258.999 hectares * 50

Evaluate

50 square miles = 129450 hectares

Hence, the number of hectares is 129450 hectares

Read mroe about metric units at

https://brainly.com/question/28234927

#SPJ1

a. The probability of getting a z-score less than -2.67 is 0.0038

b. The range to capture the middle 95% of averages is 66.56 mph to 69.44 mph.

c. The range to capture the middle 90% of averages is 66.77 mph to 69.23 mph.

d. the probability of having an average exceeding 67 mph is 0.9082.

a. The sampling distribution of the mean of a sample of 16 cars is normally distributed with a mean of 68 mph and a standard deviation of 3/√16 = 0.75 mph. The shape of the distribution is normal, the center is 68 mph, and the standard deviation is 0.75 mph. To find the probability that the mean speed of a random sample of 16 cars is less than 66 mph, we need to calculate the z-score:

z = (66 - 68) / 0.75 = -2.67

Using a z-table, we find that the probability of getting a z-score less than -2.67 is 0.0038.

b. To capture the middle 95% of averages, we need to find the z-scores that correspond to the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the normal distribution. Using a z-table, we find that these z-scores are -1.96 and 1.96, respectively. Then we can use the formula:

68 + (-1.96)(0.75) < μ < 68 + (1.96)(0.75)

which gives us the range of 66.56 mph to 69.44 mph.

c. To capture the middle 90% of averages, we need to find the z-scores that correspond to the 5th and 95th percentiles of the normal distribution. Using a z-table, we find that these z-scores are -1.645 and 1.645, respectively. Then we can use the formula:

68 + (-1.645)(0.75) < μ < 68 + (1.645)(0.75)

which gives us the range of 66.77 mph to 69.23 mph.

d. To find the probability of having an average exceed 67 mph, we need to find the z-score that corresponds to 67 mph:

z = (67 - 68) / 0.75 = -1.33

Using a z-table, we find that the probability of getting a z-score less than -1.33 is 0.0918. Therefore, the probability of having an average exceed 67 mph is 1 - 0.0918 = 0.9082.

Learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4

The minimum cost of production is $278.46.

The base width of the box be x, then the base length is 2x. Let the height of the box be h.

The volume of the box is given by:

V = base area × height

[tex]70 = x[/tex] × [tex]2x[/tex] × [tex]h[/tex]

[tex]h = 35/x^2[/tex]

The cost of producing the box is given by:

[tex]C = 2[/tex] ×[tex](cost of top/bottom) + 4[/tex] × [tex](cost of side)[/tex]

[tex]C = 2[/tex]× [tex]9[/tex]× [tex](2x[/tex] × [tex]x) + 4[/tex] × [tex]6[/tex] × [tex](2x + 2h)[/tex]

[tex]C = 36x^2 + 48xh[/tex]

Substituting the expression for h obtained above:

[tex]C = 36x^2+ 48x(35/x^2)[/tex]

[tex]C = 36x^2+ 1680/x[/tex]

To minimize C, we take the derivative with respect to x and set it to zero:

[tex]dC/dx = 72x - 1680/x^2 = 0[/tex]

[tex]72x = 1680/x^2[/tex]

[tex]x^3 = 1680/72[/tex]

[tex]= 23.33[/tex]

x = 2.82 m (rounded to two decimal places)

Substituting this value of x in the expression for h, we get:

[tex]h = 35/(2.82)^2[/tex]

[tex]= 4.34 m[/tex] (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the dimensions of the box that minimize the cost of production are:

[tex]Base width = x = 2.82 m[/tex]

[tex]Base length = 2x = 5.64 m[/tex]

[tex]Height = h = 4.34 m[/tex]

To find the minimum cost, we substitute these values of x and h in the expression for C:

[tex]C = 36(2.82)^2 + 1680/(2.82)[/tex]

[tex]C = $278.46[/tex] (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the minimum cost of production is $278.46.

To know more about cost of production visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4133859

#SPJ4

The probability that exactly 12 of the selected people belong to the labor union is approximately 0.167 or 16.7%.

To solve this problem, we can use the binomial probability formula:
[tex]P(X = k) = (n choose k)p^{k}(1 - p)^{(n - k)}[/tex]

where:
- P(X = k) is the probability of getting k successes (12 in this case)
- n is the number of trials (20 in this case)
- p is the probability of success (belonging to the labor union, which is 3600/8000 or 0.45)
- (n choose k) is the number of ways to choose k items from a set of n items, which is given by the binomial coefficient formula (n! / (k! (n-k)!))

So, plugging in the values we get:

[tex]P(X = 12) = (20 choose 12) (0.45)^{12} (1 - 0.45)^{(20 - 12)}\\ = (167,960)(0.45)^{12}(0.55)^{8}\\ = 0.167[/tex]
Therefore, the probability that exactly 12 of the selected people belong to a labor union is approximately 0.167 or 16.7%.

To know more about the calculation of probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

We can use the formula:

distance = rate × time

where distance is the total length of the road built, rate is the speed at which the road was built, and time is the number of weeks it took to build the road.

Substituting the given values, we get:

7.68 kilometers = 6 kilometers/week × time

To solve for time, we can divide both sides of the equation by 6 kilometers/week:

7.68 kilometers ÷ 6 kilometers/week = time

Simplifying the left-hand side, we get:

1.28 weeks = time

Therefore, it took the construction crew approximately 1.28 weeks to build the road.

We apply the Gram-Schmidt process to these vectors to find an orthonormal basis:

v1 = x1 = [3, -4, 1

To find a basis of the null space N(A), we need to find all vectors x such that Ax = 0, where 0 is the zero vector.

To do this, we set up the augmented matrix [A | 0] and row reduce:

[ 1 2 1 3 2 | 0 ]

[ 4 1 0 6 1 | 0 ]

[ 1 1 2 4 5 | 0 ]

R2 - 4R1 -> R2:

[ 1 2 1 3 2 | 0 ]

[ 0 -7 -4 6 -7 | 0 ]

[ 1 1 2 4 5 | 0 ]

R3 - R1 -> R3:

[ 1 2 1 3 2 | 0 ]

[ 0 -7 -4 6 -7 | 0 ]

[ 0 -1 1 1 3 | 0 ]

R2 / -7 -> R2:

[ 1 2 1 3 2 | 0 ]

[ 0 1 4/7 -6/7 1 | 0 ]

[ 0 -1 1 1 3 | 0 ]

R1 - 2R2 - R3 -> R1:

[ 0 0 0 0 0 | 0 ]

[ 0 1 4/7 -6/7 1 | 0 ]

[ 0 0 11/7 -1/7 1 | 0 ]

We can write the system of equations corresponding to this row echelon form as:

x2 + (4/7)x3 - (6/7)x4 + x5 = 0

(11/7)x3 - (1/7)x4 + x5 = 0

Solving for the variables in terms of the free variables x3, x4, and x5, we get:

x1 = -[(4/7)x3 - (6/7)x4 - x5]/2

x2 = -(4/7)x3 + (6/7)x4 - x5

x3 = x3 (free variable)

x4 = x4 (free variable)

x5 = x5 (free variable)

So the null space N(A) is the set of all vectors of the form:

x = [ -[(4/7)x3 - (6/7)x4 - x5]/2, -(4/7)x3 + (6/7)x4 - x5, x3, x4, x5 ]

To find an orthogonal basis for N(A), we can use the Gram-Schmidt process. Let's call the columns of A a1, a2, a3, a4, and a5.

First, we need to find a basis for N(A) by setting the free variables to 1 and the others to 0:

x1 = [3, -4, 1, 0, 0]

x2 = [-2, 3, 0, 1, 0]

x3 = [-2, 1, 0, 0, 1]

Next, we apply the Gram-Schmidt process to these vectors to find an orthonormal basis:

v1 = x1 = [3, -4, 1

To learn more about orthonormal visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30218173

#SPJ11

The test statistic for this sample is z = (0.254 - 0.203) / (p_hat * (1 - p_hat) * (1/n1 + 1/n2))

Based on the given information, we can set up the hypotheses as follows:

Null hypothesis: p1 - p2 = 0
Alternative hypothesis: p1 - p2 > 0

where p1 represents the proportion of successes in the first population and p2 represents the proportion of successes in the second population.

Since the sample sizes are large (n1 and n2 are not given, but we can assume they are large enough for the normal approximation to hold), we can use the normal distribution to approximate the sampling distribution of the difference in sample proportions.

The test statistic for this sample can be calculated as follows:

z = (p1 - p2) / sqrt(p_hat * (1 - p_hat) * (1/n1 + 1/n2))

where p_hat = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2), x1 and x2 are the number of successes in the two samples respectively.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

p_hat = (0.254n1 + 0.203n2) / (n1 + n2)
z = (0.254 - 0.203) / sqrt(p_hat * (1 - p_hat) * (1/n1 + 1/n2))

Since the significance level is not given, we cannot determine the critical value for the test. However, we can use the test statistic to calculate the p-value for the test, which is the probability of observing a difference in sample proportions as extreme as the one we observed (or more extreme) under the null hypothesis.

Once we have the p-value, we can compare it to the significance level to make a decision about whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Note: It is important to mention that using the normal approximation without the continuity correction may not always be accurate, especially when the sample sizes are small or the proportion of successes is close to 0 or 1. In such cases, it is recommended to use other methods (such as exact tests or simulation) that do not rely on the normal approximation.

More on test-statistic: https://brainly.com/question/16244531

#SPJ11

To achieve a margin of error of +3 for a 90% confidence interval for the average number of lawn mowings during summer in a large city with a mean of u and a standard deviation of 0-8.7, a simple random sample of size 18 should be selected.

To determine the sample size needed to achieve a margin of error of +3 for a 90% confidence interval, we can use the formula:

n = (z * σ / E)^2

where n is the sample size, z is the z-score for the desired confidence level (in this case, 1.645 for 90% confidence), σ is the standard deviation, and E is the margin of error.

Substituting the given values into the formula, we get:

n = (1.645 * 0.8 / 3)^2 = 17.18

Rounding up to the nearest whole number, we get a sample size of 18.

Therefore, to achieve a margin of error of +3 for a 90% confidence interval for the average number of lawn mowings during summer in a large city with a mean of u and a standard deviation of 0-8.7, a simple random sample of size 18 should be selected. This sample size ensures that the estimate of the population means based on the sample mean is within +3 of the true population mean with 90% confidence.

To learn more about Standard deviation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

The end behavior of the rational function is described as follows:

As x -> ∞, f(x) -> 1.

The horizontal asymptote is the value of f(x) as x goes to infinity, as long as this value is different of infinity.

For this problem, we have that both when x goes to negative infinity and when x goes to positive infinity, the graph of the function goes to y = 1, hence the end behavior of the function is defined by the horizontal asymptote as follows:

As x -> ∞, f(x) -> 1.

More can be learned about horizontal asymptotes at https://brainly.com/question/4138300

#SPJ1

The approximate height of the cliff, given the angle of elevation would be 480. 09 meters.

One approach to determining the cliff's height involves applying trigonometry's tangent function . In this instance, a given angle of elevation (58°) and 300 meters' distance from its base are known.

The tangent function is defined as:

tan (angle) = opposite side / adjacent side

tan ( 58 ° ) = h / 300

h = 300 x tan(58°)

h = 300 x 1. 6003

=  480. 09 meters

Find out more on height at https://brainly.com/question/14524817

#SPJ1

The housing supply function is given by h(I,R) = a log1 + bR + cR log1. The housing supply responds to changes in I with a rate of a, and to changes in R with a rate of b + c log1.

Based on the given equation, the housing supply (h) is determined by two variables: I and R. The equation shows that h is a function of R, with a log-linear relationship. The variable I only appears as a constant (a) in the equation, so changes in I do not directly affect the supply of houses.
On the other hand, changes in R (or OR, which is the same variable) do affect the supply of houses. Specifically, an increase in R leads to an increase in the supply of houses. The magnitude of this increase depends on the values of b and c in the equation.
To see this, we can take the partial derivative of h with respect to R:
dh/dR = b + cR/(ln(10))
This equation tells us how much the housing supply changes in response to a change in R. The derivative is positive (i.e. the supply increases) as long as c is positive. The larger c is, the greater the increase in supply for a given increase in R.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
b + cR/(ln(10))

To learn more about function, click here:

brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

42 inches divided by 1 gives the measurement 3 feet and 6 inches.

We have to find what number divides the number 42 inches to 3 feet and 6 inches.

We know that the conversion of measurement units,

1 foot = 12 inches

3 feet = 3 × 12 inches = 36 inches

3 feet 6 inch = 36 + 6 = 42 inches

So the required number divides 42 inches in to 42 inches itself.

Any number divided by 1 gives the same number.

So the required number is 1.

Hence the unknown number which divide 42 inches to 3 feet and 6 inches is 1.

Learn more about Division here :

https://brainly.com/question/4933139

#SPJ1

The statements that is false concerning the hypothesis testing procedure for a regression model is "The null hypothesis is rejected if the adjusted r2 is above the critical value".

The statement that the null hypothesis is rejected if the adjusted r2 is above the critical value is false concerning the hypothesis testing procedure for a regression model.

The F-test statistic is used to test the overall significance of the regression model, and an α level must be selected to determine the level of significance.

The null hypothesis is that the true slope coefficient is equal to zero, which means that there is no linear relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable.

The alternative hypothesis is that the true slope coefficient is not equal to zero, which means that there is a linear relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable.

The adjusted R-squared value is a measure of the goodness of fit of the regression model and represents the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable(s) in the model.

The null hypothesis is rejected if the F-test statistic is above the critical value, which indicates that the regression model is statistically significant and the independent variable(s) have a significant linear relationship with the dependent variable.

Know more about regression model here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657622

#SPJ11

The correct answer is option (c) same engine rotational speed.

In a four-stroke engine, the camshaft rotates at half the speed of the crankshaft. The camshaft controls the opening and closing of the engine valves, which allows for the intake of fuel and air and the expulsion of exhaust gases.

When the engine rotational speed is doubled, the crankshaft will rotate twice as fast, but the camshaft will still rotate at half the speed of the crankshaft. This means that the camshaft will still rotate at the same speed as before, and the valve timing will remain the same.

Similarly, when the engine rotational speed is halved, the camshaft will still rotate at half the speed of the crankshaft. This means that the camshaft will still rotate at the same speed as before, and the valve timing will remain the same.

Therefore, the correct answer is option (c) same engine rotational speed.

To learn more about camshaft visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4435994

#SPJ11

The inverse function of the function f(x) = -3x/8 is f⁻¹(x) = -8x/3

To find the inverse of a function, we need to switch the roles of x and y and then solve for y.

Let's begin by rewriting the function f(x) in terms of y:

y = f(x) = -3x/8

Now, let's switch x and y:

x = -3y/8

Next, we'll solve for y:

x = -3y/8

8x = -3y

y = -8x/3

So the inverse function of f(x) = -3x/8 is f⁻¹(x) = -8x/3

To learn more on Functions click:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ1

The estimated sum of the given series using the sum of the first 10 terms is 302,500, the improved estimate for the sum of the given series is between 305,000 and 306,000, and the value of n is 8.

(a) Utilizing the equation for the entirety of the primary n terms of the arrangement, we have:

[tex]s10 = 1^3 + 2^3 + ... + 10^3[/tex]

= 1,000 + 8,000 + ... + 1,000,000

= 302,500

In this manner, the assessed whole of the given arrangement using the entirety of the primary 10 terms is 302,500.

(b) For n = 10, we have:

[tex]sn = 1^3 + 2^3 + ... + 10^3 ≈ 302,500[/tex]

Utilizing the disparities with[tex]f(x) = x^3[/tex], we have:

[tex]sn + ∫[10,∞] x^3 dx ≤ s ≤ sn + ∫[10,∞] x^3 dx + 10^3[/tex]

Utilizing calculus, ready to assess the integrand:

[tex]sn + ∫[10,∞] x^3 dx = sn + [1/4 x^4] [10,∞] = sn + 2500[/tex]

[tex]sn + ∫[10,∞] x^3 dx + 10^3 = sn + [1/4 x^4] [10,∞] + 10^3 = sn + 3500[/tex]

Substituting sn = 302,500, we get:

302,500 + 2500 ≤ s ≤ 302,500 + 3500

305,000 ≤ s ≤ 306,000

In this manner, the made strides assess for the sum of the given arrangement is between 305,000 and 306,000.

(c) The Leftover portion Gauge for the Necessarily Test states that the mistake E in approximating the whole s of an interminable arrangement by the nth halfway entirety sn is:

[tex]E ≤ ∫[n+1,∞] f(x) dx[/tex]

In this case, we need to discover mean of n such that E < 10 using the integral test

xss=removed xss=removed> [tex][(10^-5 x 4)^(1/4)] - 1[/tex]

n > 7.9378

Subsequently, we require n = 8 to guarantee that the blunder within the estimation s ≈ sn is less than[tex]10^-5.[/tex]

learn more about the integral test

brainly.com/question/28157842

#SPJ4

The value of the expression is 1/100.

We have,

To solve this expression, we can use the division property of fractions which states that dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal.

So, we have:

1/20 ÷ 5

= 1/20 x 1/5  (reciprocal of 5 is 1/5)

= 1/100   (multiply numerator with numerator and denominator with denominator)

Therefore,

The simplified result is 1/100.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ1