Answer: The question that applies the strategy of comparing and contrasting is:
OB. Have some religions been more involved in religious wars than others?
This question involves comparing and contrasting the level of involvement of different religions in religious wars.
Explanation:
Why did hitler nullify the nazi Soviet pact by invading the Soviet Union
Answer:
To win the war.
Explanation:
Hitler knew if he succesfully invaded the soviet union he would have done the hardest part in winning WW2. Since they had a pact, Hilter knew that Stalin wasn't expecting an attack. It took them months to surround Moscow, and once they did, winter started. It got so cold that the nazi tanks stoped because the fuel was literally frozen. At that time, Stalin brought trained soldiers from the north that were especially trained to fight in winters like these, while the nazis were just freezing to death all over the place.
True or false
In 1804, Napoleon Bonaparte made himself the (president) of France.
Answer:
False. In 1804, Napoleon Bonaparte declared himself the Emperor of France, not the president.
Explanation:
Read the passage from "The Creation of the World: A Yoruba Myth. "
In the beginning, the world was only water. God looked down at the water from the sky, and decided to create land. God called his messenger Obatala, and told him to create land. Obatala was honored to be given such an important task. He called his helper Oduduwa to tell him the news. They filled a large pot with soil, and caught a chicken to take with them. They threw a rope down to the Earth. They began to climb down. When they were halfway to Earth, they stopped at a feast. Obatala ate too much and fell asleep. When Oduduwa found him asleep, he picked up the soil and the chicken and continued on the journey. Finally, Oduduwa reached the Earth. He sprinkled the soil over the water. He let the chicken go. The chicken ran in circles, making the soil spread in every direction until there was land. Oduduwa and the chicken created land from what used to be water. When Obatala finally woke up, he saw that Oduduwa had created land. He was very sad. He had missed his chance to create the world! God saw that Obatala regretted being lazy, and gave him another task. Obatala would create people for the Earth.
What does this story show about ancient West African culture?
The thing that the story show about ancient West African culture is option C: Ancient West African people believed that gods were responsible for the natural world.
What about God did Africans believe in?In general, African religions subscribe to the idea that there is a single creator God who is the architect of a dynamic universe. According to African myths, the Supreme Being withdrew after creating the universe and is no longer concerned with issues relating to human life.
The majority of African societies hold a wide variety of "great gods" and numerous lesser deities and spirits to be real. Some religions also believe in a single supreme god.
Therefore, African traditionalists hold the view that deceased relatives still have a spiritual relationship with surviving relatives. Ancestral spirits are typically benevolent and compassionate. In order to warn people that they have taken the wrong road, ancestral spirits only ever create minor ailments.
Learn more about West African people from
brainly.com/question/28420545
#SPJ4
What is an example of how Ignatius Loyola's military background impacted this religious order?
Ignatius Loyola's military background had a profound impact on the Jesuit Order, shaping its approach to education and emphasizing the importance of discipline, order, and loyalty. These values continue to influence the Jesuits today, and their educational system remains one of the most highly respected and effective in the world.
Ignatius Loyola's military background played a significant role in the formation and development of the Society of Jesus, or the Jesuits. One example of this impact is seen in the Jesuit approach to education, which is rooted in Loyola's military experience.
During his time as a soldier, Loyola developed a strong sense of discipline and order, which he applied to his religious practices and teachings. He believed that a structured approach to education was essential for the success of the Jesuit mission. As a result, the Jesuits developed a highly organized educational system that emphasized rigorous training in both academic and practical skills.
This military-inspired approach to education included a rigorous curriculum, strict discipline, and a focus on leadership and service. Loyola believed that these qualities were essential for the success of the Jesuits' mission to spread the Gospel and promote social justice.
The Jesuits also developed a strong emphasis on obedience and loyalty, which were key values in Loyola's military background. Loyola believed that a strong sense of obedience and loyalty was necessary for the success of any organization, and he instilled these values in the Jesuit Order.
Learn more about education here:-
https://brainly.com/question/18023991
#SPJ11
The purpose of the Missouri Treasurer is to
The main purpose of Missouri Treasurer is to manage the state's finances and invest taxpayer dollars.
What are the responsibilities of the Missouri Treasurer?The Treasurer is most responsible for managing the state finances and ensuring that taxpayer money are invested in a responsible and transparent manner and also oversees a variety of programs and initiatives.
One of its program allows individuals with disabilities to save for their future expenses. He also serves as a member of several state boards and commissions such as the Missouri Housing Development Commission and the Missouri State Employees' Retirement System.
Read more about Missouri Treasurer
brainly.com/question/29790736
#SPJ1
How did Theodore Roosevelt’s Corollary influence US foreign policy?
A.
It showed that the United States was becoming more passive internationally.
B.
It highlighted how the United States needed to work within the United Nations.
C.
It proposed that all nations have stronger diplomatic relations with one another.
D.
It displayed how the United States would take a more aggressive role in the world.
E.
It presented a direct threat to the Soviet Union for any action taken in Europe
It displayed how the United States would take a more aggressive role in the world influence US foreign policy.
Option D is correct
This policy displayed how the United States would take a more aggressive role in the world, asserting its dominance in the Western Hemisphere and projecting its power beyond its borders. The Corollary was a departure from previous US foreign policy, which had largely been focused on isolationism and non-intervention.
Roosevelt's policy set the stage for future US interventions in Latin America and helped to establish the US as a dominant global power.
Option D is correct
To know more about US foreign policy here
https://brainly.com/question/29628542
#SPJ1
How did European countries interact with their African colonies after World
War I?
OA. They relied more heavily on African colonies to provide resources
to help Europe rebuild.
B. They offered independence to any African colony that agreed to
provide Europe with free laborers.
OC. They ignored African colonies and focused entirely on preventing
another European war.
OD. They started conflicts between African colonies to test new
weapons and equipment.
European countries interact with their African colonies after World War I: They relied more heavily on African colonies to provide resources to help Europe rebuild.
After World War I, European nations connected with their colonies in Africa by largely depending on those colonies to offer resources to aid in their reconstruction.
These are materials that are naturally occurring and improve the standard of living. European nations dealt with their colonies in Africa by significantly depending on them to offer resources to aid in their reconstruction.
Learn more about World War I here:
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
From what you have learned about the u. S. Reaction to the irish diaspora, what similar effects do you think australia and canada faced between 1841 and 1850? do you think that there were any differences in how these countries reacted? if so, why? if not, why not? your answer should be at least 150 words in length
The Irish diaspora had a significant impact on many countries, including the United States, Canada, and Australia, during the mid-19th century.
In the United States, the affluence of Irish emigrants was met with hostility and demarcation, particularly in the northeastern metropolises where numerous settled. The Irish were seen as a trouble to American culture and society, and were frequently portrayed as violent, and uninstructed. They faced significant walls to employment, casing, and political participation.
Canada and Australia also endured an affluence of Irish emigrants during this period, but the responses were kindly different. In Canada, the Irish were originally viewed with dubitation, but as they began to assimilate and contribute to the country's frugality and culture, they were ultimately accepted and ate . In Australia, the Irish faced analogous demarcation and hostility as they did in the United States, but there were also sweats to integrate them into Australian society and culture.
Learn more about irish diaspora at
https://brainly.com/question/3767364
#SPJ4
How did the visual arts created during the 1950s challenge ideas of
conformity?
OA. Abstract Expressionism used Soviet propaganda to challenge
traditional American ideals.
B. Abstract Expressionism used traditional techniques to create
pieces that celebrated Soviet culture.
OC. Abstract Expressionism focused on traditional painting techniques
to create political propaganda that challenged traditional ideas.
OD. Abstract Expressionism moved away from traditional poraits and
landscapes and required the viewer to think of their own meaning.
D. Abstract Expressionism moved away from traditional portraits and landscapes and required the viewer to think of their own meaning.
Which of the following describe American ideological ideas, and which reflect the realities of American society?
Ideals:
-political and legal equality for all
-political authority from the consent of the governed
-religious toleration and freedom of thought
Realities:
-slavery
-Indians ceded more land to white settlers
-married women had virtually no rights at all
The statement "married women had virtually no rights at all" reflects the realities of American society, particularly in the 18th and 19th centuries. During this time, the legal concept of coverture was prevalent in the United States. Under coverture, a married woman's legal rights and property were subsumed by her husband, and she was not allowed to own property, sign contracts, or make decisions independently.
However, this reality did not align with the American ideological ideas of freedom, equality, and individual rights. The Declaration of Independence, for example, proclaimed the belief that "all men are created equal" and endowed with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Although the wording of the document did not explicitly include women, the underlying principles can be seen as promoting equal rights for all individuals, regardless of gender.
Despite the prevalence of coverture in American society, women gradually fought for and gained more rights throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. The women's suffrage movement, which culminated in the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920, granted women the right to vote. Additional progress was made in the areas of property rights, access to education, and employment opportunities.
In conclusion, the statement "married women had virtually no rights at all" reflects a historical reality in American society, where women faced significant legal and social restrictions. This reality was in contrast with the American ideological ideas of freedom, equality, and individual rights. Over time, women's rights advocates worked to bridge the gap between ideology and reality, leading to greater gender equality in the United States.
To learn more about woman's legal rights refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14208474
#SPJ11
Roosevelt's attempt to "pack" the Supreme Court proved extremely costly to FDR and to the New Deal because
a) the Court members he appointed still failed to support him and the New Deal
b) Congress began proceedings to impeach FDR so his momentum decreased
c) in an age of dictators, it made him seem like he was willing to violate separation of powers to become powerful
d) After his failed attempt, the Supreme Court declared many of his New Deal programs unconstitutional.
which of the following plans provided $400 million to greece and turkey after WWII in 1947?
Explanation:
The correct answer is the Marshall Plan.
The Marshall Plan, also known as the European Recovery Program, was a US initiative launched in 1947 that provided economic assistance to Western European countries after the devastation of World War II. The plan was named after Secretary of State George C. Marshall, who announced the program in a speech at Harvard University. The plan provided aid to countries including Greece and Turkey to help rebuild their economies and prevent the spread of communism in the region. The total aid provided by the Marshall Plan was approximately $13 billion, with $400 million specifically allocated to Greece and Turkey.
Answer:
Explanation:
it's truman doctrine look at the comment that i said at the top of the person it will show you why its truman doctrine!!! :)
Why did President Ronald Reagan withdraw American troops from Lebanon in
1984?
OA. Hundreds of American soldiers were killed in bombings.
B. Israel refused to support U.S. military operations.
OC. The Soviet Union threatened to invade the country.
D. Military spending was slashed to allow for tax cuts.
SUBMIT
Hundreds of American soldiers were killed in bombings: President Ronald Reagan withdraw American troops from Lebanon in 1984. Thus, option A is the correct option.
Why did US withdraw from Lebanon?The Reagan administration was concerned that fighting between Lebanese groups supported by Syria and Israel, as well as conflicts between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), may lead to an Arab-Israeli war beginning in 1981. However, there was disagreement among American politicians over how to avert such a fight, particularly whether or not to send soldiers in that direction.
After Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, proponents of military action gained ground. However, by 1984, President Ronald Reagan had ordered the withdrawal of American Marines from Lebanon due to terrorist assaults, a lack of diplomatic success, and legislative resistance. To stop them from capturing the vital Sannin hill in Lebanon in April 1981, the Israeli Air Force assaulted Syrian soldiers there. Surface-to-air missiles fired by Syria were fired into the Biqa Valley in retaliation.
Learn more about President Ronald Reagan here:
https://brainly.com/question/20945474
#SPJ2
What does this cartoon suggest about the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918?
Political cartoons from the time period of the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918 often reflected the fear, confusion, and social upheaval caused by the outbreak.
Numerous cartoons portrayed the flu as a important and changeable force that was inviting society. They frequently depicted people wearing masks, quarantined in their homes, or fleeing from the contagion in fear. Some cartoons also blamed government officers and medical authorities for their running of the outbreak, suggesting that they were ill- set or ineffective in their response.
Overall, the cartoons of the Spanish flu epidemic suggest that the outbreak had a profound impact on society and that it was a source of fear and query for numerous people. They also reflect the ways in which the epidemic disintegrated everyday life and challenged the authority of governments and medical experts to cover public health.
Learn more about Spanish flu at
https://brainly.com/question/31635072
#SPJ4
Help with both questions
As a leader in the German government (the Weimar Republic), should I sign the treaty of Versailles obliging us to pay an astounding $33 billion in reparations, reduce our military, and suffer a loss of territories, my initial emotional reaction would be one of disappointment and frustration.
How I would feel about the repatriationsIt would be understood that we were held responsible for the war, but it could not be denied that the conditions of the treaty imposed were abnormally severe and unjustified. Consequently, pressure from the people of Germany to stand against the terms of the treaty and strive for more equity in settlements could be expected.
Nevertheless, cognizant of our weakened position and with the intention of escaping punishment or further hostilities from other countries, precautionary measures are required in order for Germany to safeguard its independence and autonomy. Urgently focusing on rehabilitating the economy as well as reviving the military to full strength would be a focal point so as to achieve this purpose whilst also attempting to mend diplomatic relationships with global nations.
The fallout Austria-Hungary encountered by signing the accords was extensive:
- Alsace-Lorraine and certain eastern/western frontiers were conceded away - Achieving a maximum of one hundred thousand soldiers; prohibiting them to use submarines, tanks, and aircrafts- Repaying $33 billion in indemnities to the Allied forces which had negative ramifications on the economic stability and brought hyperinflation to the region at the start of the 1920’s- The War Guilt Clause acknowledged the blame wholly resting on Germany and her allies and necessitating their agreement to each clause in the Treaty of Versailles.Read more on treaty of Versailles here;https://brainly.com/question/1351074
#SPJ1
In situations where the President is suspected of
wrongdoing, such as the Watergate scandal, the
official role of the House of Representatives is to?
The official role of the House of Representatives is to investigate the issue
What does the House of Representatives do when the president does wrong?The House of Representatives plays a critical role in delicate matters wherein the President is alleged to have committed a transgression or misdeed, such as the Watergate scandal.
The representatives can initiate an impeachment proceeding against the executive in order to commence the formal process of removing them from their respective posts. Upon the chamber voting in favor of implementing the measures of impeachment, the case is referred to the Senate who, after conducting their extensive trial, can prosecute and officiate the expulsion of the already impeached incumbent.
Read morte on House of Representatives here:https://brainly.com/question/25965873
#SPJ1
Why is in incorrect to explain a cultural feature by saying it is "traditional"?
What might one say for the third LEQ for last year? "Evaluate the extent to which international conflicts in the period from 1898-1930 affected the role of the US in the world?" Iâd obviously write about WWI, but what else?
The third LEQ for last year asked to evaluate the impact of international conflicts between 1898 and 1930 on the role of the United States in the world. While World War I is an obvious choice to discuss in this essay, there were other significant international conflicts that affected the role of the US during this time period.
One such conflict was the Spanish-American War of 1898, which saw the US emerge as a global power for the first time. The US acquired colonies such as Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines, which extended its influence beyond the Western Hemisphere.
Another conflict that impacted the role of the US was the Boxer Rebellion in China in 1900. The US was part of an international coalition that intervened to suppress the rebellion and protect foreign interests in China. This led to increased US involvement in China and the establishment of the "Open Door Policy" that allowed US businesses to access Chinese markets.
Finally, the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 had implications for the US's role in the world. President Theodore Roosevelt played a key role in negotiating a peace treaty between the two powers, for which he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. This established the US as a mediator and peacemaker on the global stage.
Overall, these international conflicts, along with World War I, had a significant impact on the role of the US in the world between 1898 and 1930. It would be important to discuss each of these conflicts in depth and analyze their specific effects on the US's role in the world.
To know more international conflicts refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29774093
#SPJ11
Why was the Battle of Saratoga in September 1777 considered a decisive military victory for the patriot cause?
Answer:
The American defeat of the superior British army lifted patriot morale, furthered the hope for independence, and helped to secure the foreign support needed to win the war.
Explanation:
The Battle of Saratoga was a turning point during the Revolutionary war.
Answer:
The Battle of Saratoga in September 1777 was considered a decisive military victory for the patriot cause because it was the first major defeat of a British army in the war and it convinced France to enter the war as an ally of the United States. The British general John Burgoyne had planned to march from Canada to Albany, New York, and join forces with other British troops to isolate and crush the New England colonies. However, he faced strong resistance from the Continental Army led by Horatio Gates and Benedict Arnold, as well as local militia and sharpshooters. In two battles fought near Saratoga, Burgoyne lost many of his men and was forced to surrender his entire army of over 6,000 soldiers on October 17. This stunning victory boosted the morale of the Americans and impressed the French, who had been secretly aiding the rebels since 1776. The French decided to openly support the American cause by signing a treaty of alliance in February 1778 and sending troops, ships, and supplies to help fight the British. The Battle of Saratoga thus turned the tide of the war in favor of the Americans and paved the way for their eventual independence.
Explanation:
in the 1960s, the bureau of narcotics and dangerous drugs faced widespread disregard of drug laws by large numbers of young people who
In the 1960s, the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) faced widespread disregard of drug laws by large numbers of young people who were part of the counterculture movement. This movement often promoted drug use as a means of personal expression and rebellion against societal norms.
The BNDD had to address these challenges and enforce drug laws to prevent the spread of drug abuse and protect public health. They did this by conducting investigations, arresting those involved in drug trafficking, and collaborating with other agencies to develop comprehensive drug enforcement strategies.
What is bureau of narcotics and dangerous drugs?
A division of the US Department of Justice (DOJ), the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) served as the forerunner of the current Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).
To know more about Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD):
https://brainly.com/question/21634898
#SPJ11
How are the social conditions of the 19th century different to pre-revolutionary France?
New western nations, such as, ___ often banned silvery when they achieved independence
New western nations, such as, Ghana and Kenya often banned slavery when they achieved independence
Several European nations founded colonies throughout the colonial era in many different parts of the world, including Africa, Asia, and the Americas. During this period, slavery was a common practise, with colonial powers frequently using indigenous populations as slave labor and for economic gain. But as push for independence and self-determination gathered strength in middle of 20th century, many colonies yearned to renounce colonial control and form their own independent states.
Some of these newly independent countries made decision to outlaw slavery as a part of their efforts to create own communities and set own standards of morality and behavior. This was frequently interpreted as a rejection of repressive colonial practises and a move to advance equality, social justice, and human rights in these newly independent countries. Examples of African nations who freed themselves from colonial rule and outlawed slavery as they started the process of constructing their nations include Ghana, Nigeria, and Kenya.
Read more about slavery on:
https://brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ4
what did harriet elizabeth and william u6.2 the people on this list are similar because their actions - question 7 options: promoted support for westward expansion showed dedication to sectionalism and states' rights promoted interest in agricultural innovation showed commitment to rights and freedoms
Harriet, Elizabeth, and William are all similar in that their actions promoted support for westward expansion. This means that they were in favor of the idea of pushing the boundaries of the United States further west, which was a popular idea in the 19th century. This was seen as a way to expand the country's resources and opportunities, as well as to spread American values and beliefs.
Their support for westward expansion also ties into their dedication to sectionalism and states' rights. Sectionalism refers to the idea that different regions of the country have different interests and needs, and that these should be taken into account when making decisions about the country as a whole. States' rights, on the other hand, is the idea that individual states should have more power and autonomy than the federal government.
These ideas were closely tied to westward expansion, as the new territories that were being opened up were often seen as opportunities for individual states to expand their power and influence.
Finally, their actions also promoted interest in agricultural innovation. As the country expanded westward, there was a growing need for new agricultural techniques and technologies that could help farmers to grow crops in new and challenging environments. Harriet, Elizabeth, and William were all advocates for new agricultural methods, and their work helped to promote innovation in this important area.
Overall, the actions of Harriet, Elizabeth, and William show a commitment to promoting the growth and development of the United States, as well as a dedication to the values of sectionalism, states' rights, and agricultural innovation. Their work helped to shape the country in important ways, and their legacies continue to be felt today.
To learn more about westward expansion refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29774506
#SPJ11
What happened after the Chinese Exclusion Act was passed?
After the Chinese Exclusion Act was passed in 1882, Chinese immigration to the United States was significantly reduced, and those already in the country faced discrimination and limited opportunities.
The Chinese Exclusion Act was the first law in U.S. history to exclude a specific ethnic group from immigrating to the country. It was enacted due to anti-Chinese sentiment and the belief that Chinese immigrants were taking jobs away from U.S. citizens.
The Act suspended Chinese immigration for ten years and made Chinese immigrants ineligible for naturalization. As a result, the Chinese community in the United States became more isolated, as they could not reunite with their families in China or bring new immigrants to the country. Additionally, Chinese people already in the United States experienced widespread discrimination, were often forced to live in segregated neighborhoods, and had limited job opportunities.
The Chinese Exclusion Act had lasting negative effects on the Chinese community in the United States, leading to reduced immigration, isolation, and discrimination against Chinese people living in the country. It remained in effect until 1943, when it was repealed during World War II as a gesture of goodwill towards China, which was an ally at the time.
For more information on Chinese Exclusion Act kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/513896
#SPJ11
What did the report sent to Johnson on august 4th state?
Answer:
August 4, 1964: Report on the Gulf of Tonkin Incident
Explanation:
How did british leaders respond when the american colonist refused to obey great britans new laws
Answer:
They were very angry and ordered British troops to America in case they tried to revolt. They also added more taxes and laws that escalated the conflict to the Boston massacre and the Boston Tea Party. Then to the Revolutionary War.
How far does the strength of anti-war feeling among the British explain why Chamberlain persisted with the policy of appeasement?
Answer:
The strength of anti-war feeling among the British played a significant role in Chamberlain's decision to pursue a policy of appeasement with Nazi Germany. The traumatic experience of World War I, which had ended just over twenty years earlier, had left a lasting impact on British society, with many people being deeply averse to the prospect of another conflict. This sentiment was particularly strong among politicians and the general public, who feared the devastating human and economic costs of another war.
Chamberlain believed that the policy of appeasement offered a way to avoid war and achieve peace with Germany, which he saw as a reasonable goal. He believed that by making concessions to Hitler, he could satisfy the Germans' legitimate grievances and prevent further aggression. This approach was popular with many British people who were tired of war and looking for a way to avoid another conflict.
However, Chamberlain's policy of appeasement was ultimately unsuccessful in preventing war. Hitler continued to pursue his expansionist ambitions, and the concessions made by Chamberlain only emboldened him to demand more. The failure of the appeasement policy was a significant factor in Chamberlain's political downfall and ultimately led to his replacement as Prime Minister by Winston Churchill, who took a more aggressive stance towards Nazi Germany.
Explanation:
During the years leading up to World War I, Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany sought to expand his country's navy to compete with that of Great Britain. This suggests that Germany was most likely pursuing a policy of
From 15 June 1888 until his abdication on 9 November 1918, Wilhelm II, often known as William II, was the last German emperor and king of Prussia.
On November 9, 1918, Kaiser Wilhelm II was compelled to relinquish his throne and leave Germany for Holland after losing the support of the military and a domestic revolution. A left-leaning Social Democratic Party leader named Friedrich Ebert became the head of state.
One of the most well-known public characters of World War I (1914–18) was Wilhelm II (1859–1941), the German Kaiser (emperor) and monarch of Prussia from 1888 to 1918.
Learn more about Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany here:
https://brainly.com/question/1259394
#SPJ1
Why did Luther refuse to take back what he had written about the Church?
Answer:
Luther refused to take back what he had written about the Church because he believed that his ideas were based on the Bible and that the Church's teachings were corrupt and in need of reform. He also believed that he had a duty to speak out against what he saw as wrongdoing within the Church.
Explanation:
Why does Mao think struggle is necessary for the development of Marxism?
Mao Zedong established a form of Marxism-Leninism known as Maoism, which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) refers to as Mao Zedong Thought, in order to bring about a socialist revolution in the rural, pre-industrial society of the Republic of China and subsequently the People's Republic of China.
Every class conflict, according to Marx, is a political conflict. This implies that if the proletariat and capitalists are engaged in an economic conflict today, they will be forced to engage in political conflict tomorrow in order to defend their respective class interests in a conflict with dual manifestations.
According to Marxism, the conflict between the bourgeoisie, or capitalists, and the proletariat, or workers, defines economic relations in a capitalist system and will eventually result in a communist society.
Learn more about Marxism visit: brainly.com/question/29544281
#SPJ4