Provide three examples of how you could show that you embrace diversity

Answer:

1. Attend cultural events: Attending cultural events such as festivals, concerts, and exhibitions is a great way to learn about different cultures and show that you embrace diversity. By immersing yourself in different cultural experiences, you can gain a better understanding and appreciation of different customs, traditions, and ways of life.

2. Volunteer for diversity-related causes: Volunteering for diversity-related causes such as refugee support organizations, LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, or racial justice initiatives is another way to show that you embrace diversity. By actively supporting and advocating for marginalized communities, you can demonstrate your commitment to promoting equality and inclusivity.

3. Educate yourself: Educating yourself about different cultures, religions, and lifestyles is an important step in embracing diversity. Reading books, watching documentaries, and taking online courses are all great ways to expand your knowledge and understanding of different cultures and perspectives. By educating yourself, you can become a more informed and empathetic individual, which can help you better connect with people from diverse backgrounds.

Social contract theorists say that morality consists of a set of rules governing how people should treat one another that rational beings will agree to accept for their mutual benefit on the condition that others agree to follow these rules as well.

Thomas Hobbes looked to the distant past to observe a primitive "state of nature" in which there was no such thing as morality. He found that this self-interested way of being was "nasty, brutish, and short," that is, a perpetual state of warfare. He outlined the civilized solution to this problem in the form of a logical syllogism.

We are all self-interested.
Each of us needs to have a peaceful and cooperative social order to pursue our interests.
We need moral rules in order to establish and maintain a cooperative social order.
Therefore, self-interest motivates us to establish moral rules.

John Locke disagreed. He refuted Hobbes' claim that early civilizations were always "at war" by pointing to historical examples of people in that "state of nature" and praising their efforts to maintain both their individuality and a fair society.

Locke set forth the view that the state exists to preserve the natural rights of its citizens. He found that when governments fail in that task, citizens have the right and sometimes the duty to withdraw their support and even to rebel.

So, which philosophy is most like your own? Is human nature animalistic or noble? How can you tell?

Let's consider an example that many of us can relate to. In December of 2001, just months after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Richard Reid attempted to detonate a shoe bomb while on board a passenger airplane bound from Paris to Miami. Fortunately, some quick thinking and brave flight attendants and passengers were able to stop him. As a result of that single incident, millions of passengers have been obliged to take off their shoes while going through the airport security check. Some consider this to be a reasonable precaution, while others feel it is an overreaction that inconveniences everyone without increasing safety.

For your initial post, discuss an example of something most of us are routinely required to do that limits our personal freedom. In your opinion, is the loss of freedom justified by some gain in social order or safety? Why or why not?

THEO: According to Rosemary Ruether, what are the positive attributes or applications of an androgynous Jesus Christ? How is this a positive theology for women?