"price by mathematical induction
Prove that n! > 2^n for all n ∈ Z≥4"

There are 16 different validated tickets are needed if every punching machine in town creates 4 holes on a ticket

When a ticket is punched by a punching machine, it creates a hole in the ticket. In this case, each hole can either be punched or not punched, so there are 2 possibilities for each hole.

Since there are 4 holes on a ticket, the total number of possible combinations is calculated by multiplying the number of possibilities for each hole:

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 16

So, there are 16 possible combinations of holes on a ticket, which means that a fee evader would need 16 different validated tickets to cover all possible combinations. This assumes that each punching machine creates the same pattern of holes, which may not be the case in practice.

Learn more about combination at https://brainly.com/question/13387529

#SPJ11

Answer:

7/3

Step-by-step explanation:

2-1/3-2/+1 in its simplest fraction is equal to 7/3.

The explicit formula of the sequence is -3n + 36.

The sequence above is a arithmetic progression. Therefore, let's write the nth term of the sequence.

Hence,

33, 30, 27

a + (n - 1)d = nth term

where

Therefore,

a = 33

d = 30 - 33 = -3

n = number of term

Hence,

nth term = 33 + (n - 1)-3

nth term = 33 - 3n + 3

nth term = -3n + 36

learn more on sequence here: https://brainly.com/question/30948434

#SPJ1

$134

$110+$24=$134

if Bob had 110 in his account and found he had a -24 balance, you would need to add the two together to find the check amount written.

The absolute value function as a piecewise function is

Given that

f(x) = |-x^2 + 9x - 18|

When the expression is factored, we have

f(x) = |-(x - 3)(x - 6)|

Set the expression in the absolute bracket to 0

This gives

-(x - 3)(x - 6) = 0

When the equation is solved for x, we have

x = 3 and x = 6

These values represent the boundaries of the piecewise function

So, we have

f(x) = -(-x^2 + 9x - 18), x < 3 and x > 6

f(x) = -x^2 + 9x - 18, 3 ≤ x ≤ 6

Read more about piecewise function

https://brainly.com/question/27262465

#SPJ1

The number of truck loads of grain required to fill an empty silo is 51.97

Volume of the hemisphere = 2/3)πr^3,

Volume of hemisphere would be

[tex]hemisphere = (2/3)\pi (8 ft)^3 = 268.08 ft^3[/tex]

Volume of cylinder =  πr^2h

Then we will have

[tex]cylinder = \pi(8 ft)^2(40 ft) \\= 8046.72 ft^3[/tex]

Total volume

[tex]V_hemisphere + V_cylinder = 8314.80 ft^3[/tex]

[tex](8 ft)(5 ft)(4 ft) = 160 ft^3[/tex]

Number of truck loads

= 8314.80 ft^3 / 160 ft^3

=  51.97

Hence the number of truck loads of grain required to fill an empty silo is 51.97

Read more on hemisphere here https://brainly.com/question/25641436

#SPJ1

Answer:

$8.40

Step-by-step explanation:

2w + 5g = 57

w + 3g = 32.7

w = 32.7 - 3g

2(32.7 - 3g) + 5g = 57

65.4 - 6g + 5g = 57

8.4 = g

Answer: $8.40

A) The best graphical representation for the given data is a histogram.

B) The histogram of the given data is illustrated below.

Part A:

A histogram is a type of bar graph that shows the frequency distribution of a set of continuous or discrete data. The given data is a set of discrete data, and a histogram is the most appropriate graph to display the distribution of these data.

Part B:

To create a histogram for the given data, we need to follow these steps:

In summary, to create a histogram for the given data, we need to provide a title, label the x and y-axes, choose an appropriate scale for the x-axis, plot the data, and add final touches to make the graph more informative and visually appealing.

To know more about histogram here

https://brainly.com/question/30354484

#SPJ1

The solution to the polynomial division is:

3x³ + 7x² + 5x - 1 - 4/(2x - 3)

A long division polynomial is defined as an algorithm that is used in dividing polynomial by another polynomial of the same or a lower degree. The long division of polynomials is made up of the divisor, quotient, dividend, and the remainder as in the long division method of numbers.

We are given the polynomial functions as:

f(x) = 6x⁴ - 23x³ + 31x² - 17x - 1

g(x) = 2x - 3

Using polynomial long division we have:

         3x³ + 7x² + 5x - 1

2x - 3|6x⁴ - 23x³ + 31x² - 17x - 1

      -  6x⁴ -   9x³

                  -14x³ + 31x²

                - -14x³ + 21x²

                               10x² - 17x

                            - 10x² - 15x

                                       - 2x  - 1  

                                      - -2x + 3

                                               - 4

Read more about polynomial long division at: https://brainly.com/question/25289437

#SPJ1

This example does not qualify as a binomial experiment because the conditions of a binomial experiment are not all met.

While there are only two possible outcomes (drawing a diamond or not), the other conditions are not satisfied. Specifically, the outcome of each trial is not independent of those of other trials because cards are drawn without replacement, and there is not a fixed number of n trials as the number of trials depends on how many cards are drawn until seven diamonds are obtained. Additionally, the probability of each possible outcome in any trial is not the same from trial to trial because the number of cards in the deck changes as cards are drawn.

Learn more about binomial experiment here:

brainly.com/question/30851182

#SPJ11

The sentence written in the indicative mood is: "The team plays much better after a pep talk from their coach."

The grammatical mood known as the indicative is employed to state or inquire about facts.

The verb forms in the indicative mood show that the action or state described is actually occurring or has already occurred. For instance, the statement "I am walking to the store" is suggestive since it is a factual statement describing an action that is now occurring.

Learn more about indicative mood here : brainly.com/question/27391674

#SPJ1

If the order contains 22 products, it will take 16.06 minutes to gather the items. The correct option is (b).

Based on the given regression output, the equation to predict the time it takes to gather items from the number of items in an order is:

Predicted time [tex]= 3.0979 + 2.7633[/tex] × (square root of items)

To find the predicted time for an order with 22 items, we can substitute the value of 22 into the equation:

Predicted time [tex]= 3.0979 + 2.7633[/tex] × (square root of 22)

Predicted time ≈ [tex]16.06[/tex]

The predicted time is estimated using a least-squares regression analysis that relates the number of items in an order to the time taken to gather them. The regression output provides the equation to predict the time. By substituting the value of 22 items into the equation, the predicted time is calculated to be approximately 16.06 minutes.

Therefore, the predicted time, in minutes, that it took to gather the items for an order with 22 items is approximately 16.06 minutes.

To know more about Predicted Time visit:

https://brainly.com/question/953289

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Workers at a warehouse of consumer goods gather items from the warehouse to fill customer orders. The number of Items in a sample of orders and the time, in minutes, it took the workers to gather the items were recorded. A scatterplot of the recorded data showed a curved pattern, and the square root of the number of items was taken to create a linear pattern. The following table shows computer output from the least-squares regression analysis created to predict the time it takes to gather items from the number of items in an order.

Predictor                       Coef

Constant                       3.0979

Square root of items    2.7633

R-Sq=96.7%

Based on the regression output, which of the following is the predicted time, in minutes, that it took to gather the items if the order has 22 Items?

a. 7.99

b. 16.06

c. 27.49

d. 17.29

e. 63.89

P(3) is approximately equal to  0.139.

(a) Yes, we can use the Poisson approximation to find P(30 < x < 35) because both np and n(1-p) are greater than or equal to 10, where n = 100 and p = 0.3. Therefore, the conditions for the Poisson approximation are satisfied.

Using Poisson approximation, we have:

λ = np = 100 x 0.3 = 30

P(30 < x < 35) ≈ P(X = 31) + P(X = 32) + P(X = 33) + P(X = 34)

= e^(-λ) * ([tex]λ^31[/tex] / 31!) + e^(-λ) * (λ^32 / 32!) + e^(-λ) * (λ^33 / 33!) + e^(-λ) * (λ^34 / 34!)

≈ 0.1885

(b) Using the normal approximation, we have:

µ = np = 100 x 0.3 = 30

σ = sqrt(np(1-p)) = sqrt(100 x 0.3 x 0.7) = 4.58

P(30 < x < 50) ≈ P((30 - µ)/σ < (x - µ)/σ < (50 - µ)/σ)

≈ P(-4.34 < Z < 4.34) [where Z is a standard normal random variable]

≈ 1

Therefore, P(30 < x < 50) is approximately equal to 1.

(c) Let x be a binomial random variable with n = 4 and P(0) = 0.0081.

We need to find P(3).

Let P(1) = q

Then, from the given information, we have:

P(0) = (1-q)^4 = 0.0081

Solving for q, we get:

q = 1 - (0.0081)^(1/4) ≈ 0.207

Now, using the binomial probability formula, we have:

P(3) = (4 choose 3) * q^3 * (1-q)^1

= 4 * 0.207^3 * 0.793

≈ 0.139

Therefore, P(3) is approximately equal to 0.139.

To learn more about approximation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/26257968

#SPJ11

For a polygon which is composed of three rectangles and dimensions are 4 ft× 2ft, 4 ft× 3 ft , 8 ft × 1.2ft. Area of polygon is 29.6 ft².

In geometry, a polygon is defined as the flat or plane surface, two-dimensional closed shape of boundaries. The sides of a polygon are also known as its edges. The points where two sides meet are called vertices (or corners) of a polygon. We have a polygon is composed of three rectangles.

The dimensions of rectangles are the following, 4 ft× 2ft, 4 ft× 3 ft , 8 ft × 1.2ft. We have to determine the area of polygon in square feet. The area of a polygon is defined as total space covered within the shape. The measurement is completed with square units. Rectangles are regular shape. The area of rectangle = length × width

Total area of polygon is equals to the sum of areas of three rectangles. So, area of polygon = 4 ft × 2 ft + 4 ft × 3 ft + 8 ft × 1.2 ft

= 8 ft² + 12 ft² + 9.6 ft²

= 29.6 ft²

Hence, required value is 29.6 ft².

For more information about polygon, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/26583264

#SPJ4

The probability that an observation on flow rate when pressure drop is 10 in. will exceed an observation on flow rate made when pressure drop is 11 in. is .7602.

a. The expected change in flow rate associated with a 1-in. increase in pressure drop is the slope of the regression line, which is .095 m3/min per in. of water. This means that for each additional inch of pressure drop, we can expect the flow rate to increase by an average of .095 m3/min.

b. When pressure drop decreases by 5 in., we can expect the flow rate to decrease by an average of .095 * (-5) = -.475 m3/min.

c. For a pressure drop of 10 in., the expected flow rate can be calculated by plugging x = 10 into the regression line equation: y = -.12 + .095(10) = .838 m3/min.

d. To find the probabilities, we need to standardize the flow rate values using the formula z = (y - μ) / σ, where μ is the mean flow rate and σ is the standard deviation. For a pressure drop of 10 in., the expected flow rate is .838 m3/min, so

P(Y > .835) = P(Z > (.835 - .838) / .025) = P(Z > -.12) = .4522

P(Y > .840) = P(Z > (.840 - .838) / .025) = P(Z > .08) = .4681

where Z is a standard normal random variable.

e. We need to find the probability that an observation on flow rate when pressure drop is 10 in. will exceed an observation on flow rate made when pressure drop is 11 in. This can be done by subtracting the mean flow rate for each pressure drop from their respective observations, and then finding the probability that the difference is positive. Let Y_10 and Y_11 denote the flow rates for pressure drops of 10 in. and 11 in., respectively. Then the probability of interest is:

P(Y_10 - Y_11 > 0) = P((Y_10 - μ_10) - (Y_11 - μ_11) > -(μ_11 - μ_10))

where μ_10 and μ_11 are the mean flow rates for pressure drops of 10 in. and 11 in., respectively. Since the regression line is linear, we can find the mean flow rate for any given pressure drop x using the equation μ = -.12 + .095x. Therefore,

μ_10 = -.12 + .095(10) = .758 m3/min

μ_11 = -.12 + .095(11) = .853 m3/min

Substituting these values into the probability expression gives:

P(Y_10 - Y_11 > 0) = P((Y_10 - .758) - (Y_11 - .853) > -.095)

We know from part (a) that the standard deviation of the flow rate is σ = .095 m3/min per in. of water. Therefore, the standard deviation of the difference Y_10 - Y_11 is

σ_diff = sqrt(σ^2 + σ^2) = sqrt(2)*σ = .134 m3/min

Using the formula for a standardized normal variable, we have:

P((Y_10 - .758) - (Y_11 - .853) > -.095) = P(Z > (-.095 / .134)) = P(Z > -.71) = .7602

where Z is a standard normal random variable. Therefore, the probability that an observation on flow rate when pressure drop is 10 in. will exceed an observation on flow rate made when pressure drop is 11 in. is .7602.

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

To find the water-level height (feet) as a function of time (hours), we need to know the volume of the pool and how much water is being pumped in per hour.

The volume of the rectangular pool can be found by multiplying its length, width, and height:

Volume = Length x Width x Height

Since we know the dimensions of the pool are 20 feet by 10 feet, we can assume the height is 5 feet (half the length of the pool).

Volume = 20 ft x 10 ft x 5 ft = 1000 cubic feet

This means the pool can hold 1000 cubic feet of water.

If 50 cubic feet of water is pumped into the pool per hour, we can write the water-level height (h) as a function of time (t) as follows:

h(t) = (50t) / 1000

where t is the time in hours.

For example, after 1 hour, the water-level height would be:

h(1) = (50 x 1) / 1000 = 0.05 feet

After 2 hours, the water-level height would be:

h(2) = (50 x 2) / 1000 = 0.1 feet

And so on.

To learn more about Dimensions - brainly.com/question/13324776

#SPJ11

The interval of t-values such that c(t) = (cos t, sin t) traces the upper half of the unit circle (in the counter-clockwise direction) is [0, pi].

To see why this is the case, recall that the unit circle is given by the equation x^2 + y^2 = 1, where (x,y) are the coordinates of a point on the circle. The upper half of the unit circle corresponds to the set of points (x,y) where y is positive or zero. We want to find the values of t for which c(t) lies on the upper half of the unit circle.

Using the definition of c(t), we have c(t) = (cos t, sin t). The y-coordinate of c(t) is sin t, so we want, sin t to be positive or zero. Since sin t is positive in the first and second quadrants of the unit circle, and zero at t = 0 and t = pi, we have that c(t) traces the upper half of the unit circle when t is in the interval [0, pi].

To see that c(t) traces the upper half of the unit circle in the counter-clockwise direction, note that as t increases from 0 to pi, c(t) moves counterclockwise around the unit circle, starting at (1,0) and ending at (-1,0). Thus, the interval [0, pi] corresponds to one-half of a full counterclockwise rotation around the unit circle, which is exactly the upper half of the circle.

To learn about T-distribution, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16994704

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex] \frac{2}{3} square \: units[/tex]

The maximum likelihood estimate of t is at the endpoint t = 0.

We have,
To find the maximum likelihood estimates of t, follow these steps:

1. Write down the likelihood function L(t) for the given pdf f(t).

The likelihood function is the same as the pdf, which is:
L(t) = (1 - t)^k

2. Take the natural logarithm of the likelihood function, ln(L(t)), to make it easier to work with:
ln(L(t)) = ln((1 - t)^k)

3. Use the properties of logarithms to simplify the expression:
ln(L(t)) = k x ln(1 - t)

4. Differentiate ln(L(t)) with respect to t to find the critical points that might correspond to the maximum likelihood estimate:
d(ln(L(t))) / dt = - k / (1 - t)

5. Set the derivative equal to zero and solve for t:
- k / (1 - t) = 0
Since k is nonzero, this equation implies that there is no solution for t in the interval [0, 1].

Thus, the maximum likelihood estimate of t does not occur at a critical point in the interval.

6. Since there are no critical points, we must check the endpoints of the interval, t = 0 and t = 1, to find the maximum likelihood estimate.

The likelihood function L(t) = (1 - t)^k has its maximum value at the endpoint where the derivative is positive.

In this case,

The derivative -k / (1-t) is positive when t = 0.

Thus, the maximum likelihood estimate of t is at the endpoint t = 0.

Thus,

The maximum likelihood estimate of t is at the endpoint t = 0.

Learn more about maximum likelihood here:

https://brainly.com/question/30625970

#SPJ11

The area of the shaded region is 9198.11 in³ - 112.5 in².

We have,

Sphere:

Diameter = 26 in

Radius = 26/2 = 13 in

Volume.

= 4/3 πr³

= 4/3 x 3.14 x 13 x 13 x 13

= 9198.11 in³

Now,

The unshaded region is a trapezium.

Height = 5 in

Parallel sides = 19 in and 26 in

Area = 1/2 x height x (sum of the parallel sides)

= 1/2 x 5 x (19 + 26)

= 1/2 x 5 x 45

= 1/2 x 225

= 112.5 in²

Now,

The area of the shaded region.

= Volume of the sphere - Area of the trapezium

= 9198.11 in³ - 112.5 in²

Thus,

The area of the shaded region is 9198.11 in³ - 112.5 in².

Learn more about Sphere here:

https://brainly.com/question/12390313

#SPJ1

It has been proved that if (a, b) = 1, then (a², b²) = 1.

If I understand correctly, you want to prove that if (a, b) = 1, then (a², b²) = 1.
Co-prime numbers or relatively prime numbers are those numbers that have their HCF (Highest Common Factor) as 1. In other words, two numbers are co-prime if they have no common factor other than 1.

Since (a, b) = 1, it means that a and b are coprime, which means they have no common factors other than 1. Now, let's consider their squares, a², and b².

If a² and b² had a common factor other than 1, then this factor would also be a factor of a and b, which contradicts our initial assumption that (a, b) = 1.

Therefore, (a², b²) must also be equal to 1, proving that if (a, b) = 1, then (a², b²) = 1.

Learn more about prime numbers:

https://brainly.com/question/145452

#SPJ11

The cost of the wood for the walls of the playhouse is $1141.44.

To calculate the cost of the wood for the walls of the playhouse, we need to find the surface area of the walls and then multiply it by the cost per square foot.

The surface area of the walls of an octagonal pyramid can be calculated by finding the area of each trapezoidal face and adding them up. Since the side length of the pyramid is 3 feet and the slant height is 12 feet, we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the height of each trapezoidal face:

h = √(12² - (3/2)²)

h = √(144 - 2.25)

h = √(141.75)

h ≈ 11.89 feet

The area of each trapezoidal face is:

A = 1/2 * (b1 + b2) * h

A = 1/2 * (3 + 3) * 11.89

A ≈ 35.67 square feet

There are 8 trapezoidal faces in the octagonal pyramid, so the total surface area of the walls is:

SA = 8 * A

SA ≈ 285.36 square feet

Finally, we can calculate the cost of the wood for the walls by multiplying the surface area by the cost per square foot:

Cost = SA * $4

Cost = 285.36 * $4

Cost = $1141.44

Therefore, the cost of the wood for the walls of the playhouse is $1141.44.

To know more about   trapezoidal, here

https://brainly.com/question/1410008

#SPJ4

In the statistical argument provided, Emily concludes that everyone in the class must have received a high grade on the quiz based on the information from her study group. The fallacy being committed in this argument is a combination of A. Biased Sample Fallacy and B. Hasty Generalization Fallacy.

A. Biased Sample Fallacy occurs when the sample is used to make a conclusion that is not representative of the entire population. In this case, Emily's study group consists of 16 students out of a total of 30 students in her class. The study group may not be representative of the whole class, as it is a smaller sample and could be composed of more diligent or prepared students.

B. Hasty Generalization Fallacy is when a conclusion is made based on insufficient evidence. In this argument, Emily concludes that everyone in the class must have received a high grade based on the performance of her study group alone. This is a hasty generalization as she has not considered the performance of the other students in the class.

To sum up, the argument commits both A. Biased Sample Fallacy and B. Hasty Generalization Fallacy, as it bases its conclusion on a potentially unrepresentative sample and insufficient evidence.

To know more about the fallacies visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31201486

#SPJ11

The volume of the cylinder is 803.9 ft².

Given is oblique cylinder, we need to find it volume,

Volume = π × radius² × height

The radius = 8 ft

The height = 4 ft

So,

The volume = 3.14 × 8² × 4

= 803.9 ft²

Hence, the volume of the cylinder is 803.9 ft².

Learn more about volume click;

https://brainly.com/question/31606882

#SPJ1

The amount of glass needed = surface area of the triangular prism = 2,646 cm².

The glass has a triangular prism shape. Therefore, the amount of glass needed to build the showcase is calculated by finding the surface area of the image given.

Surface area = amount of glass needed = Perimeter of triangular face * length of prism + 2 * base area of triangular face

= (S1 + S2 + S3) * L + bh

We are given the variables as:

S1 = 15 cm

S2 = 15 cm

S3 = 24 cm

L = 45 cm

b = 24 cm

h = 9 cm

Plug in the values:

Surface area = (15 + 15 + 24) * 45 + 24 * 9 = 2,430 + 216

amount of glass needed = 2,646 cm²

Learn more about surface area of triangular prism on:

https://brainly.com/question/22512771

#SPJ1

For the answer of factors of expression (12 + 54), in the form of a(b + c), where a is the GCF of 12 and 54 is equals to 6( 2 + 9).

In math, to factor a number means to express it as a product of (other) whole numbers, called its factors. For example, if 7x5 = 35, 7 and 5 are both factors. The divisors that give the remainder to be 0 are the factors of the number. We have an expression of numbers, 12 + 54. We have to write this expression in form of a( b + c), where a is GCF of 12 and 54. Now, we can write the factors of 12 and 54 are 12 = 2×2×3

54 = 2×3 ×3×3

The greatest common factor, GCF of 12 and 54 is 2×3 = 6. So, 12 + 54 = 6× 2 + 6×9

Taking out the common factor 6 from above expression, 6( 2 + 9) which is required form a( b + c). Hence, required expression is 6( 2 + 9).

For more information about factor, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28765863

#SPJ4

1) the mean, median, mode, and range of the set of data are given below.

When considering a set of numbers, several measures can be used to describe the data. The mean, for example, is determined by adding all individual values together and dividing by the total number of elements in the set.

This value is representative of an average quantity among the group studied. On the other hand, if one were to arrange said values from smallest to largest, the median would represent the middle-most number in that list - or, if two middle numbers exist, their mean.

Range on the other hand is the variance between the largest and the smallest number in a data set.

Lastly but not least important is the mode, which indicates the most frequently appearing value within our dataset; or alternatively so noted as when there are multiple repetitions.

So here is the Mean, Median, Mode and Range for the given sets of data:

1)

Mean = (4.3 +  5.2 + 4.5 + 5.1 + 4.8 + 5.4 + 4.5 + 4.7 + 4.3 + 5.2 + 4.5 + 4.8 + 5.1) / 13

= 4.8

Mean ≈ 4.8

Median = when arranged in ascending order, the data se become:

4.3,4.3,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.8,4.8,5.1,5.1,5.2,5.2,5.4

Since there are 13 observation, 7th observation is the median.
4.3,4.3,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,|  4.8, | 4.8,5.1,5.1,5.2,5.2,5.4

hence median = 4.8

Note that where the number of data is even in number, the median become the average of the two middle numbers.

Mode - the number that occrs the highest is 4.5. It occurs thrice.

Range = Highest Data Value - Lowest Data Value

Range = 5.4 - 4.3

= 1.10

Using the above steps we derive the mean median, mode and range for the other data set:

2) 12.6, 12.8, 9.7, 10.4, 9.7, 10.8, 12.4, 12.8, 11.5, 10.4, 10.9, 12.8
Total of 12 number

Data in ascending order: 9.7,9.7,10.4,10.4,10.8,10.9,11.5,12.4,12.6,12.8,12.8,12.8

Mean = 11.4
Median = (10.9 +11.5)/2 = 11.2

Mode = 12.8
Range = 3.10

3)  
-6, -13, -8, -3, -7, -10, 2, 0, -3, -5, 5, 7, -6, 2, 1, -6, -18
Data in ascending order;  -12, -10, -8, -7, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 7

Mean = -1
Median = 0
Mode = 0
Range = 19


4) -6, -13, -8, -3, -7, -10, 2, o, -3, -5, 5, 7, -6, 2, 1, -6, -18

Data in ascending order: -18, -13, -10, -8, -7, -6, -6, -6, -5, -3, -3, 1, 2, 2, 5, 7

Mean = -4.25
Median = -5.5
Mode = -6
Range = 25

5) 0.24, 0.31, 0.43, 0.22, 0.34, 0.24, 0.35, 0.4, 0.18, 0.3, 0.29

Data in ascending order: 0.18, 0.22, 0.24, 0.24, 0.29, 0.3, 0.31, 0.34, 0.35, 0.4, 0.43

Mean = 0.3
Median = 0.3
Mode = 2.4
Range = 2.5


6) -0.6, 0.4, 0.2, -0.3, 0.1, -0.5, 0.2, 0.4, 1.1, -0.6, 0.7, o, 0.2, -1.3

Data in ascending order: -1.3, -0.6, -0.6, -0.5, -0.3, 0.1, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.7, 1.1

Mean = 0
Median = 0.2
Mode = 0.2
Range = 2.4

Learn more about median:
https://brainly.com/question/28060453
#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

The y-axis intercept occurs when x = 0

put in 0 for 'x' and compute the intercept as

(0+2)(0-2)(0-A)   = 12

      -4 ( -A) = 12

       4A =12

         A = 3

The value of d in millimeters is 12 mm and this can be determined by using the similar triangle property.

Triangle RST is similar to  triangle RVW.

The length of the segment RW = 10 mm

The length of the segment WT = 5 mm

The length of the segment TS = 18 mm

The following steps can be used in order to determine the value of d in millimeters:

The similar triangle property can be used in order to determine the value of d in millimeters.

The value will be:

= 10/15 × 18

= 12

Learn more about triangles on

https://brainly.com/question/15186010

#SPJ1

The population of interest in this study is all births in southern California between the years 1989 and 1993. The sample in this study is 143,196 births for which length of gestation data and air pollution exposure during gestation were collected.

The results of this study cannot be generalized to the entire population of births in southern California beyond the years 1989 to 1993. However, the findings of the study can still provide valuable insights into the relationship between air pollutants and preterm births in this specific population and time period. It is also important to note that this study alone cannot establish causal relationships between air pollutants and preterm births, as other factors may contribute to preterm births that were not measured or accounted for in this study. Further research and analysis would be needed to establish causal relationships.

Know more about gestation data here:

https://brainly.com/question/29563113

#SPJ11