is this correct or not​

Answer:

A)  F(x) = 50 + ( x - 10 )*9  

B) Graph

C) lim ( x ⇒ 10) F(x) = 50

Step-by-step explanation:

A) F(x) = 50 + ( x - 10 )*9       since the first 10 hours are included in initial fee

B) In Annex

C) lim (x ⇒ 10) F(x) = 50 + ( 10 -10)*9

lim ( x ⇒ 10) F(x) = 50 + 0

lim ( x ⇒ 10) F(x) = 50

Answer:

j=v-k/a

Step-by-step explanation:

It's like order of operations backwards. So first, you would get rid of the k, by subtracting it from both sides. Then, to isolate j you would divide both sides by a.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

just add up both alternate internal angles as they are both equal

so, the equation is: 2x-10 = 65-x

Answer:

The right equation will be 2x - 10 = 65 - x (you were wrong lol)

Step-by-step explanation:

We have: 2x - 10 = 65 - x

=> 2x - 10 + x = 65

=> 3x = 65 + 10 = 75

=> x = 75/3 = 25

P/S: After some little chats with the others, this might be wrong :(

Answer:

The minimum sample size required is 79.

Step-by-step explanation:

The following are given in the question:

e = Margin of error = 110

σ = Standard deviation = 500

Confidence level = 95%

n = Minimum sample size = ?

Therefore, we have:

Zσ = 1.96 at 95% confidence level

s.e. = Standard error = σ / [tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex] = 500 /

Alternatively, margin of error can be calculated as follows:

e = s.e. * Zσ = 110 ................... (1)

Substituting the other values into equation (1) and solve for n, we have:

500 / [tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex] * 1.96 = 110

500 / [tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex]  = 110 / 1.96

500 / [tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex]  = 56.1224489795918

500 = 56.1224489795918 *  [tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex]  

[tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex]  = 500 / 56.1224489795918

[tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex]  = 8.90909090909092

[tex]n^{\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = 8.90909090909092

Squaring both sides, we have:

([tex]n^{\frac{1}{2}[/tex])^2 = (8.90909090909092)^2

n = 79.3719008264465

Approximating to a whole number, we have:

n = 79

Therefore, the minimum sample size required is 79.

Answer:

2143

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

No. √14 + 6.2 is more than 3π - 8.2

Step-by-step explanation:

√14 + 6.2

√20.2

≈ 4.494

π ≈ 3.14159

3(3.14159) - 8.2

9.42577 - 8.2

1.22477

Therefore, the answer is no.

Answer:

to?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{a=4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\log_xy=z\iff x^z=y\\\\\text{for}\ x\neq1\ \wedge\ x>0\ \wedge\ y>0\\==================\\\\\log_a81=4\iff a^4=81\\\\a^4=\underbrace{3\cdot3\cdot3\cdot3}_{=81}\\\\a^4=3^4\Rightarrow a=3[/tex]

Answer:

Is there supposed to be an image?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Responds to my friend

Decision rule

 Fail to reject the null hypothesis

Conclusion

There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of residents in California who are vegetarians is higher than the proportion in New Hampshire who are vegetarian  

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we are going to consider this question

For example, you may believe that the proportion of adults in California who are vegetarians is more than the proportion of adults in New Hampshire who are vegetarians. In two independent polls, you may find that 109 out of 380 California residents are vegetarians and 39 out of 205 New Hampshire residents are vegetarians.

Here we are going to be solving the hypothesis test problem and we will be making use of the p-value method

From the question the we are told that

     The first sample size is  [tex]n_1 = 380[/tex]

       The second sample size is [tex]n_2 = 205[/tex]

       The number of California residents that are vegetarian is [tex]k = 109[/tex]

       The number of New Hampshire resident that are veterinarian is [tex]u = 39[/tex]

Generally the sample proportion for California residents is

      [tex]\^ p_1 = \frac{k}{n_1}[/tex]

=> [tex]\^ p_1 =\frac{109}{380}[/tex]

=> [tex]\^ p_1 =  0.2868 [/tex]

Generally the sample proportion for New Hampshire residents is

     [tex]\^ p_2 = \frac{39}{205}[/tex]

=>  [tex]\^ p_2 = 0.1902 [/tex]  

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o  :  p_1 -p_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a :  p_1 -p_2 > 0[/tex]

 Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented  as

[tex]t  =  \frac{(\^ p_1 - \^ p_2 ) -0}{\sqrt{ \frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^p_1 )}{n_1}  + \frac{\^ p_2 (1- \^p_2)}{n_2} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t  =  \frac{( 0.2868 - 0.1902) -0}{\sqrt{ \frac{0.2868 (1-0.2868 )}{380}  + \frac{0.1902(1- 0.1902)}{205} } }[/tex]  

=>  [tex]t  =  0.036[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df  =  n_1 + n_2 -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df  =  380 + 205 -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df  =  583/tex]

Generally the probability of  [tex]t  =  0.036[/tex] at a degree of freedom of   [tex]df  =  583/tex]  from the t- distribution table is  

      [tex]p-value  =  P(t >  0.036) =  0.48564732[/tex]

Let take the level of significance to be [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

So from the values obtained we see that  [tex]p-value  >  \alpha[/tex] hence the decision rule is  

   Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

  There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of residents in California who are vegetarians is higher than the proportion in New Hampshire who are vegetarian

Answer: A.

Step-by-step explanation: Brainliest plz

Answer:

Are there answers

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

answer

Herman is standing on a ladder that is partly in a hole. He starts out on a rung that is 6 feet under ground, climbs up 14 feet, then climbs down 11 feet. ...

Answer:

4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply 2 by 2, and get 4, then we multiply 3 by 2 and get 6.

Since our denominators match, we can add the numerators. 4 + 4 = 8. That gives us the sum, which is 8/6. Then you divide by 2.  So 8/6 / 2 gives you 4/3.

Answer:

4/3 or 1 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 4/6 + 2/3

2. 4/6 + 4/6          You have to find the LCM (least common multiple) of the two  denominators. In this case it would be 6. You have to multiply 3 by 2 to get 6. What you do to the bottom you also do to the top so you have to also multiply the numerator (2) by 2.

3. 4/3 or 1 1/3       Afterward, you just have to add straight across without changing the denominator and then if you need to simplify you simplify. Without simplifying, you would get 8/6, but, most teachers will mark it as wrong if you don't simplify. You can then change the improper fraction into a mixed number depending on what your teacher wants.

Answer:

( 4 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

also go to g-mail to check out my

Type in Brandon Acevedo

okay

Answer: there is 90 players in total

Step-by-step explanation:

6x 2= 12

78 + 12 = 90

Answer:

x=15

Step-by-step explanation:

6(x−2)=78 (or 6x−12=78), x=15

Answer:

= 1 × 10^-7

(scientific notation)

= 1e-7

(scientific e notation)

= 100 × 10^-9

(engineering notation)

(billionth; prefix nano- (n))

= 0.0000001

(real number)

Step-by-step explanation:

10^7 = 10000000

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that: The number of combination to select any k consecutive element from n consecutive term is given by the equation [tex]^{n-k+1}C_k[/tex]

[tex]= \begin {pmatrix} ^{n-k+1}_{k} \end {pmatrix}[/tex]

where:

n = 26

k = 5

[tex]^{n-k+1}C_k= \begin {pmatrix} ^{26-5+1}_{5} \end {pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]^{n-k+1}C_k= \begin {pmatrix} ^{22}_{5} \end {pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]^{n-k+1}C_k= \dfrac{22!}{5!(22-5)!}[/tex]

[tex]^{n-k+1}C_k= \dfrac{22!}{5!(17)!}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{^{n-k+1}C_k=26334}[/tex]

Therefore, there are 26334 selection of 5 episodes with no two consecutive episodes chosen

Answer:

the answer would be 70 because you take 90-20 and you get 70. you have a 90 degree angle is what you're working on right now

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 7 left because fish can't drown

Answer:djjdd

Please I love free points secy

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok but guys is 10009

Answer:

8.6•10^-5 or 0.000086

Answer:

The sign of the leading coefficient for the polynomial equation of the graph is NEGATIVE

Hope this helps!

Answer: 1 turning point

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-23h

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

= 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Find 2 points on the graph

(2,3) and (6,6)

Using the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

   = ( 6-3)/(6-2)

   = 3/4

Answer:

1.2in

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(1) 1.2 inches

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  C, M

Step-by-step explanation:

The second quadrant is the upper left quadrant. There, x-values will be negative and y-values will be positive.

__

Point G is on the boundary with the 3rd quadrant, so is probably not considered to be in either of those quadrants.

Answer: C M

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x = -0.25+√2.4375i or -0.25-√2.4375i

Step-by-step explanation:

The quadratic formula works for this. The quadratic equation ...

  ax² +bx +c = 0

has solutions given by the quadratic formula:

  [tex]x=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}[/tex]

Your equation ...

  2x² +x +5 = 0

has coefficients a=2, b=1, c=5, so the quadratic formula tells you the solutions are ...

  [tex]x=\dfrac{-1\pm\sqrt{1^2-4\cdot2\cdot5}}{2\cdot2}=\dfrac{-1\pm\sqrt{-39}}{4}\\\\x=\left\{-\dfrac{1}{4}+\dfrac{\sqrt{39}}{4}i, -\dfrac{1}{4}-\dfrac{\sqrt{39}}{4}i\right\}[/tex]

The decimal equivalents are ...

  x = -0.25+√2.4375i   or   -0.25-√2.4375i . . . . . . the 'i' is outside the radical

Answer:

for r= 70 cm

the rate is 0.008cm/s

for r=95cm

the rate= 0.0044cm/s

Step-by-step explanation:

kindly find attached a rough sketch of the circle and a detailed solution of the problem.

Given data

rate dv/dt=500cm^3

r=70cm

r=95cm