Is it possible to partition an arbitrary right triangle into isosceles triangles? Justify your answer.
please answer asap :)

Answer and explanation:

Please find attached

Answer:

None.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: where’s the picture?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

How to Easily Calculate the Serving Size in Recipes

Weigh the Food. Before you can accurately divide your recipe into servings, you need to know how much it weighs in total. ...

Divide the Recipe into Servings. ...

Calculate Calories. ...

Save the Information.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1,3,4

Step-by-step explanation: hope this helps you

Answer:

[tex]\mathbf{y(x) = \dfrac{(c_1 + c_2) \ cos (x)}{e^{6x} }+ \dfrac{i(c_1 -c_2) \ sin (x)}{e^{6x}}+ c_3e^{3\ x}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The objective of this question is to solve:

[tex]\dfrac{dy(x)}{dx}+ 9\dfrac{d^2y(dx)}{dx^2}+\dfrac{d^3y(x)}{dx^3}-111y(x) = 0 :[/tex]

Suppose the general solution is proportional to [tex]e^{\lambda x}[/tex] for [tex]\lambda[/tex] is constant; Then:

Let's replace [tex]y(x) = e^{\lambda\ x}[/tex] into the above equation:

i.e.

[tex]\dfrac{d^3}{dx^3}(e ^{\lambda x} )+ 9 \dfrac{d^2}{dx^2}(e ^{\lambda x} ) + \dfrac{d}{dx}(e ^{\lambda x} )- 111 \ e ^{\lambda x} = 0[/tex]

To Replace:

[tex]\dfrac{d^3}{dx^3}(e ^{\lambda x} )[/tex] with [tex]\lambda^3 e ^{\lambda x }[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{d^2}{dx^2}(e ^{\lambda x} ) \ with \ \lambda^2 e^{\lambda\ x}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{d}{dx}(e ^{\lambda x} ) \ with \ \lambda e ^{\lambda \ x}[/tex]

Thus;

[tex]\lambda^3 e ^{\lambda x }[/tex] + [tex]9 \lambda^2 e^{\lambda\ x}[/tex] + [tex]\lambda e ^{\lambda \ x}[/tex] - 111 [tex]e ^{\lambda \ x}[/tex] = 0

[tex]e ^{\lambda \ x} (\lambda ^3 + 9 \lambda ^2 + \lambda - 111 )= 0[/tex]

∴

In as much as [tex]e^{ \lambda x}\neq 0[/tex] for any finite [tex]\lambda[/tex]; Then:

[tex]\lambda ^3 + 9 \lambda ^2 + 111 = 0[/tex]

By Factorization:

[tex](\lambda - 3) ( \lambda ^2 + 12 \lambda + 37) = 0[/tex]

[tex]\lambda = -6 + i \ or\ \lambda = -6 - i \ or \ \lambda = 3[/tex]

However;

The root [tex]\lambda = -6 \pm i[/tex] yield;

[tex]y_1 = (x) = c_1 e ^ {(-6+i)x}[/tex]

[tex]y_2 (x) = c_2e^{(-6-i)x}[/tex]

The root [tex]\lambda = 3[/tex] yield;

[tex]y_3(x) = c_3 e^{3x}[/tex]

∴

The general solution is:

[tex]y(x) = y_1(x) + y_2(x) + y_3(x) = \dfrac{c_1}{c^{(6-i)}x}+\dfrac{c_2}{c^{(6+i)}x}+ c_3e^{3x}[/tex]

Using Euler's Identity ;

[tex]e^{\alpha+i \beta} = e^\alpha \ cos (\beta ) + i \ e^\alpha \ sin ( \beta)[/tex]

[tex]y(x) = c_1 ( \dfrac{cos (x) }{e^{6x}}+ \dfrac{i \ sin x }{e^{6x} }) + c_2 ( \dfrac{cos (x)}{e^{6x}}- \dfrac{-i \ sin (x)}{e^{6x}})+c_3 e^{3x}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{y(x) = \dfrac{(c_1 + c_2) \ cos (x)}{e^{6x} }+ \dfrac{i(c_1 -c_2) \ sin (x)}{e^{6x}}+ c_3e^{3\ x}}[/tex]

Answer:

Angle 1 and Angle 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle 1 and angle 7 are supplementary angles. Angle 3 and angle 7 are corresponding angles and angle 1 + angle 3 = 180

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

supplementary angles adds up to 180

angle 1 and angle 7 is an example of supplementary angles.

other options do not apply.

Answer:

x = 39

Step-by-step explanation:

A circle is made up of 360 degrees

235+ 54+ x+32 = 360

Combine like terms

x+321=360

Subtract 321 from each side

x+321-321 = 360-321

x = 39

Answer:

269.75

Hope this helps:)

Step-by-step explanation:

I think the the answer is 20

Answer:

f(x) = x2 – p(x + 1) – c, then (α + 1)(β + 1)f(x) = x2 – p(x + 1) – c, then (α + 1)(β + 1)f(x) = x2 – p(x + 1) – c, then (α + 1)(β + 1)f(x) = x2 – p(x + 1) – c, then (α + 1)(β + 1)f(x) = x2 – p(x + 1) – c, then (α + 1)(β + 1)f(x) = x2 – p(x + 1) – c, then (α + 1)(β + 1)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

You just divide 27 by 3, then divide that answer by 3, and keep doing that until you get to 1:

27/3

9

9/3

3

3/3

1

3^x = 27

3^3 = 27

3 x 3 x 3 = 27

9 x 3 = 27

27 =27

Answer:

The midpoint of the points (2,8) and (0,4) is given by:

(

2

x

1

+x

2

,

2

y

1

+y

2

)=(

2

2+0

,

2

8+4

)=(

2

2

,

2

12

)=(1,6)

We must must transform the standard form equation −3x+6y=5 into a slope-intercept form equation (y=mx+b) to find its slope.

−3x+6y=5 (Subtract 3x on both sides.)

6y=3x+5 (Divide both sides by 6.)

y=

6

3

x+

6

5

y=

2

1

x+

6

5

The slope of our first line is equal to

2

1

. Perpendicular lines have negative reciprocal slopes, so if the slope of one is x, the slope of the other is

x

1

.

The negative reciprocal of

2

1

is equal to −2, therefore, −2 is the slope of our line.

Since the equation of line passing through the midpoint (1,6), therefore, substitute the given point in the equation y=−2x+b:

6=(−2×1)+b

6=−2+b

b=6+2=8

Substitute this value for b in the equation y=−2x+b:

y=−2x+8

Hence, the equation of the line is y=−2x+8.

Step-by-step explanation:

make me as brain liest

Answer:

2.35 hamburgers

Step-by-step explanation:

H6.25 + H18.75 = 58.75

Answer:

I not see the number 2

I think that is number 2

Answer:

first and last one should be the answer (not sure about the first, cant see it too good)

Answer:

y = 3x+7

Step-by-step explanation:

The standard form of equation in slope-intercept form is:

y = mx+c

m is the slope

c is the intercept

Given the coordinates (-3, -2) and (3, 16)

Get the slope;

Slope = ∆y/∆x

Slope = y2-y1/x2-x1

Slope = 16-(-2)/3-(-3)

Slope = 16+2/3+3

Slope = 18/6

Slope = 3

Get the Intercept

Substitute one of the points in the formula:

Using the coordinate (-3, -2)

y = mx+c

-2 = 3(-3)+c

-2 = -9 + C

c = -2+9

c = 7

Get the equation of the line by substituting m and c into the equation y = mx+c

y = 3x+7

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  y = x +7

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope of the given line can be found as ...

  m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)

  m = (3 -7)/(-1 -3) = -4/-4 = 1

Then the point-slope form of the equation for the desired line is ...

  y -k = m(x -h) . . . . . . line with slope m through point (h, k)

  y - 9 = 1(x -2)

  y = x -2 +9

  y = x + 7 . . . . slope-intercept form

__

The attachment shows a graphing application that will write the equation of the line. Here, it shows the desired line has the equation ...

  x -y = -7 . . . . desired line equation in standard form

Answer:

bout 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:3.049533e+44 to be exact

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

15

Step-by-step explanation:

Following PEMDAS you would do the equation in the parentheses first.

1 - 15 = -14

13 - 2  ⋅ (-14) divided by 14

-2 ⋅ (-14) = 28

13 + 28 divided by 14

28 divided by 14 = 2

13 + 2 = 15

Your answer is 15

Hope I helped :)

Please consider Brainliest :)

Answer:

1 is -47.

2 is -20

3 is 16.

4 is 33.

Step-by-step explanation:

Brainiest?

Answer:

Jenn runs faster at 9 minutes/mile.

Step-by-step explanation:

Jana runs 3 miles in 1/3 hour.

1/3 hour is equivalent to 1/3*60 = 20 minutes

The ratio time/distance is the reciprocal of the speed and is greater as the speed is lower and vice-versa.

This ratio for Jana is 20/3=16.7 minutes/mile

As for Jenn, she runs 5 miles in 3/4 hour.

3/4 hour is equivalent to 3/4*60=45 minutes

The ratio time/distance is 45/5=9 minutes/mile

Since Jenn has a lower ration, her speed is greater than Jana's, thus Jenn runs faster.

Answer: It has one solution (8, 2).

Step-by-step explanation:

I put both equations in Desmos and the solution was (8,2)

Answer:

It's 141,000

Step-by-step explanation:

because 4 or lower doesn't raise the rounding up it stay's the same if it is 4 or lower. But 5 or more raises it up so anything five or more you can round up. They taught me that in 4th grade but now i'm in 6th grade wich is so hard.

Answer:

-4( 3a+4)

Step-by-step explanation:

-12a - 16

-4*3a -4*4

Factor out a -4

-4( 3a+4)

Answer:

The answer to this question is C.

Step-by-step explanation:

All that you have to do is multiply the exponents.

Answer:

-3.21

Step-by-step explanation:

If you pay close attention the numbers are 5 points away from each other, so after -3.2 is -3.21! Hope that helped love :)