Find the equation of the quadratic function g whose graph is shown below.
(5,3)
(6.0)
8
201 12 114
g(x) = 0

The value of x in the rectangular prism is 9 inches.

The height of the rectangular prism can be found as follows:

The volume of the rectangular prism is 153 inches cube.

Therefore,

volume of the rectangular prism = lwh

where

Therefore,

volume of the rectangular prism = 8.5 × 2 × x

153 = 17x

divide both sides by 17

x = 153 / 17

x = 9 inches

learn more on rectangular prism here: https://brainly.com/question/31420255

#SPJ1

For a statistical analysis, the report should include an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. It should be written in a clear and concise manner, and include any visual aids such as graphs or tables that help to illustrate the findings.

To find the relation between the two variables, age and number of diabetes tests, based on the linear equation y = a + bx, we need to perform linear regression analysis. follow the steps:

Collect the data in the table.

Organize the data into a spreadsheet, with the age and the number of diabetes tests as the two columns.

Calculate the mean of the age and the number of diabetes tests.

Calculate the covariance between age and the number of diabetes tests.

Calculate the variance of the age.

Calculate the regression coefficient (b) using the formula b = covariance / variance.

Calculate the intercept (a) using the formula a = mean(y) - b * mean(x), where x is the age and y is the number of diabetes tests.

Plot the data of the age and the number of diabetes tests.

Draw the regression line on the scatter plot using the equation y = a + bx.

Interpret the results by writing a report that explains the relationship between age and the number of diabetes tests, based on the regression analysis.

Include the information such as correlation coefficient, coefficient of determination (R-squared), and  p-value.

Conclude the report with recommendations.

Know more about statistical analysis here:

https://brainly.com/question/14724376

#SPJ11

If the drain for a 90 percent efficient furnace and the drain for the air conditioning coil are run with a common drain, the drain should be sized large enough to accommodate the combined condensate flow from both systems.

To determine the appropriate size, you should:
1. Check the manufacturer's recommendations for both the furnace and the coil.
2. Calculate the maximum condensate flow from each system.
3. Add the two values together to find the total condensate flow.
4. Select a drain size that can handle the combined flow rate.

Learn more about furnace: https://brainly.com/question/28268048

#SPJ11

The endpoints of the t-distribution with 2.5% beyond them in each tail for the given sample sizes are approximately -2.0301 and 2.0301.

To find the endpoints of the t-distribution with 2.5% beyond them in each tail for the given sample sizes, follow these steps:

1. Determine the degrees of freedom: Since you have two samples with sizes n1 = 15 and n2 = 22, the degrees of freedom (df) will be (n1 - 1) + (n2 - 1) = 14 + 21 = 35.

2. Find the t-value corresponding to the 2.5% tail probability: Using a t-distribution table or an online calculator, look for the t-value that corresponds to a cumulative probability of 0.975 (since you want 2.5% in each tail, and the remaining 95% is between the tails). For df = 35, the t-value is approximately 2.0301.

3. Determine the endpoints: The endpoints of the t-distribution will be the positive and negative t-values found in step 2. So, the endpoints are approximately -2.0301 and 2.0301.

Thus, the endpoints of the t-distribution with 2.5% beyond them in each tail for the given sample sizes are approximately -2.0301 and 2.0301.

Learn more about distribution here:

brainly.com/question/24083306

#SPJ11

The value of the stock decreased by $203.

We have,

The initial value of the stock is:

= 25 shares X $35.48/share

= $887

The current value of the stock is:

= 25 shares x $27.36/share

= $684

The value of the stock decreased by:

= $887 - $684

= $203

Thus,

The value of the stock decreased by $203.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ1

The amount of space within the cylinder not taken up by the tennis balls is 18.9 [tex]inches^3[/tex]

The volume of a tennis ball:

The circumference of the tennis ball is 8 inches.

The tennis ball is the form of sphere whose circumference is given by formula [tex]2\pi r[/tex] , where r is the radius.

Thus, if r is the radius then according to condition,

[tex]2\pi r[/tex]  = 8 or

r = 8/2[tex]\pi[/tex] inches.

Now, the volume of the sphere of radius r is [tex]\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3[/tex] hence, find the volume of the given tennis ball by substituting r  = 8/2[tex]\pi[/tex] inches in [tex]\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3[/tex] and simplify:

Volume = [tex]\frac{4}{3} \pi[/tex] × [tex](\frac{8}{2\pi } )^3[/tex]

Volume = 8.65 [tex]inches^3[/tex]

Hence the required volume of the tennis ball is 8.65 [tex]inches^3[/tex]

The volume of three tennis balls is (3 × 8.65) [tex]inches^3[/tex]  = 25.96 [tex]inches^3[/tex]

Find the volume of the cylinder:

The volume of the cylinder with radius r units and height h units is given by  [tex]\pi r^2h[/tex] Hence the volume of the given cylinder with radius 1.32 inches , 8.2 height inches is:

[tex]\pi (1.32)^2[/tex] × 8.2

= 3.14 × [tex](1.32)^2[/tex] × 8.2

= 44.86 [tex]inches^3[/tex]

Hence the volume of the cylinder is 44.86 [tex]inches^3[/tex]

Find the amount of space within the cylinder not taken up by the tennis balls.

The required volume can be obtained by subtracting the volume three tennis balls from the volume of the cylinder as follows:

Volume of cylinder - volume of three tennis balls = (44.86 - 25.96) = 18.9 [tex]inches^3[/tex]

Hence, the amount of space within the cylinder not taken up by the tennis balls is 18.9 [tex]inches^3[/tex].

Learn more about Volume of cylindrical at:

https://brainly.com/question/16788902

#SPJ1

a) The equilibrium point is x = 2 or x = 8

b) The consumer surplus equilibrium point is $6,062.67

c) The producer surplus equilibrium point is $13,208.67

a) To find the equilibrium point, we need to set the demand function equal to the supply function and solve for x:

D(x) = S(x)

[tex](x - 5)^2 = x^2 + x + 3[/tex]

Expanding the left side and simplifying, we get:

[tex]x^2 - 10x + 22 = 0[/tex]

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

[tex]x = (10[/tex] ± [tex]\sqrt{36})/ 2[/tex]

[tex]x = 5[/tex] ± [tex]3[/tex]

[tex]x = 2[/tex] or [tex]x = 8.[/tex]

b) To find the consumer surplus at the equilibrium point, we need to calculate the area under the demand curve and above the equilibrium price, which is given by the supply curve. Since we have two possible equilibrium points, we need to check both of them to see which one gives us a positive consumer surplus.

For [tex]x = 2[/tex], the equilibrium price is given by [tex]S(2) = 11[/tex], which is above the demand curve. Therefore, there is no consumer surplus at this equilibrium point.

For [tex]x = 8[/tex], the equilibrium price is given by [tex]S(8) = 75[/tex], which is below the demand curve. Therefore, the consumer surplus is given by the area under the demand curve and above the price of 75:

[tex]∫[75, 8] (x - 5)^2 dx = [(x - 5)^3 / 3][/tex] from 8 to 75

≈[tex]6,062.67[/tex]

This means that at the equilibrium point x = 8, consumers are willing to pay a total of approximately $6,062.67 more than what they actually pay.

c) To find the producer surplus at the equilibrium point, we need to calculate the area under the equilibrium price and above the su

For x =2 supply curve. Again, since we have two possible equilibrium points, we need to check both of them to see which one gives us a positive producer surplus.

2, the equilibrium price is given by [tex]S(2) = 11,[/tex] which is above the demand curve. Therefore, there is no producer surplus at this equilibrium point.

For x = 8, the equilibrium price is given by[tex]S(8) = 75[/tex], which is below the demand curve. Therefore, the producer surplus is given by the area above the supply curve and below the price of 75:

∫[tex][8, 75] (75 - x^2 - x - 3) dx = [(75x - x^3/ 3 - x^2 / 2 - 3x)][/tex] from 8 to 75

≈ [tex]13,208.67[/tex]

This means that at the equilibrium point x = 8, producers receive a total of approximately $13,208.67 more than their costs.

To learn more about equilibrium point visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17431835

#SPJ4

Continuous-compounding is a method of calculating interest where the interest is added to the principal continuously.

instead of being added at regular intervals (such as monthly or annually). This means that the interest is compounded an infinite number of times-over the year, resulting in a higher effective interest rate than other compounding methods.

In this scenario, the person has invested [tex]$479[/tex] in an account that earns an annual interest rate of [tex]8.2%[/tex] compounded continuously. This means that the interest is added to the account balance continuously throughout the year.

The formula for calculating the balance of an account with continuous compounding is:

[tex]V = Pe^(rt)[/tex]

where:

V = the balance after t years

P = the initial investment (or principal)

e = the mathematical constant approximately equal to [tex]2.71828[/tex]

r = the annual interest rate as a decimal

t = the number of years

Using this formula and substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]V = 479e^(0.08212)[/tex]

Simplifying this expression, we get:

[tex]V ≈ $1,204.70[/tex]

Therefore, the person's investment of [tex]$479[/tex] with an annual interest rate of [tex]8.2%[/tex]  compounded continuously, would grow to approximately after 12 years

The formula for calculating the value of the account after t years, with continuous compounding, is:

[tex]V = Pe^(rt)[/tex]

where V is the final value, P is the initial principal, r is the interest rate (expressed as a decimal), and t is the time in years.

Using this formula, we can calculate the value of the account after 12 years:

[tex]V = 479 * 2.6709[/tex]

[tex]V = 1280.74[/tex]

Final answer

Therefore, the amount of money in the account after [tex]12[/tex] years, to the nearest cent, is [tex]$1,280.74.[/tex]

To learn more about Continuous-compounding visit

https://brainly.com/question/18187284

#SPJ4

Answer:

Equation: 

4x + 127 = 227

The per-hour cost for labor, x, was $25 per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to find the cost of labor for each hour. They worked on her computer for 4 hours. The per hour cost of labor we don't know, so we can call it x.

The repair shop charges x dollars per hour.

So the total LABOR charge is 4x.

The whole cost is:

Whole_Cost

= LABOR + PARTS

We know the whole cost, $227.

We know the parts, $127.

227 = 4x + 127

To solve, subtract 127

100 = 4x

divide by 4

25 = x

The cost per hour for labor is $25per hour.

The break-even x-value for Year-round-Recreation is approximately 26.19.

To find the break-even points for Year-round-Recreation, we need to set the total costs equal to total revenues and solve for x. In this case, the total costs are given by C(x) = 2750 + 30x + 2, and the total revenues are given by R(x) = 135x.

The break-even point is when C(x) = R(x), so:

2750 + 30x + 2 = 135x

Now, we need to solve for x:

1. Subtract 30x from both sides:
2750 + 2 = 105x

2. Subtract 2 from both sides:
2750 = 105x

3. Divide both sides by 105:
x = 2750 / 105
x ≈ 26.19

The break-even x-value for Year-round-Recreation is approximately 26.19.

Break-even pointsbhttps://brainly.com/question/13735564

#SPJ11

Answer:

-3x^2 + 12x + 5x - 20 = -3x^2 + 17x - 20

Step-by-step explanation:

(-3x - 5)(-x + 4) is a binomial expression, where (-3x - 5) is one expression and (-x + 4) is the other.

As the text eludes to, we can multiply binomial expressions using the FOIL method, where you multiply the first terms (3x and -x), outer terms (3x and 4), the inner terms (-5 and -x), and the last terms (-5 and 4)

This is how you get

(3x)(-x) + (3x)(4) + (-5)(-x) + (-5)(4)

Now, multiply the terms and combine like terms:

[tex](3x)(-x)+(3x)(4)+(-5)(-x)+(-5)(4)\\-3x^2+12x+5x-20\\-3x^2+17x-20[/tex]

The given  statement pattern is a tautology.

To determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction, or a contingency: (p→q)∨(q→p), follow these steps:

1. Write out the truth table for p and q:
  p | q
  -----
  T | T
  T | F
  F | T
  F | F

2. Calculate the truth values for (p→q) and (q→p) using the implication rule (p→q is false only when p is true and q is false):
  (p→q) | (q→p)
  -----------
   T     |   T
   F     |   T
   T     |   F
   T     |   T

3. Finally, calculate the truth values for the given statement pattern (p→q)∨(q→p) using the disjunction rule (a disjunction is true if at least one of the statements is true):
  (p→q)∨(q→p)
  ---------
     T
     T
     T
     T

Since the statement pattern (p→q)∨(q→p) is true for all possible truth values of p and q, it is a tautology.

Learn more about : Mathematical Reasoning - https://brainly.com/question/27935612

#SPJ11

Conversely, a wider interval may be less precise, but it has a higher probability of capturing the true population parameter.

When the confidence level is increased from 95% to 99%, the sample confidence intervals will become longer. This is because the confidence level represents the probability of the true population parameter lying within the interval. As the confidence level increases, the probability of capturing the true population parameter also increases, which means the interval needs to be wider to account for the increased probability.

In other words, a higher confidence level requires a wider interval to ensure that the true population parameter is captured with a higher probability. This is a trade-off between precision and accuracy – a narrower interval may be more precise, but it also has a lower probability of capturing the true population parameter. Conversely, a wider interval may be less precise, but it has a higher probability of capturing the true population parameter.

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly chosen voter from the survey  is under 50 years old is 0.75

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The table of values

Where we have

Voters under 50 years old = 847 + 804 + 773

Total = 3228

So, the required probability is

P = (847 + 804 + 773)/3228

Evaluate

P = 0.75

Hence, the probability is 0.75

Read more about probability at

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer to your problem is, 63

Step-by-step explanation:

So we know that he has 2,835 comic books. He is also going to put them in boxes to ship it in a book store.

1 Box = 45 Comic Books

So in order to solve the problem we need to divide:

The expression includes:

2,835 ÷ 45 = 63

Thus the answer to your problem is, 63

The alternative of buying 3 machines should be chosen based on the maximin criterion.

a. The maximax criterion suggests choosing the alternative with the maximum possible payoff. In this case, the maximum payoffs for each alternative are $10,000, $30,000, and $40,000 for buying 1, 2, and 3 machines respectively. Therefore, the alternative of buying 3 machines should be chosen based on the maximax criterion.

b. The maximin criterion suggests choosing the alternative with the maximum possible minimum payoff. In this case, the minimum payoffs for each alternative are $5,000, $4,000, and $24,000 for buying 1, 2, and 3 machines respectively. Therefore, the alternative of buying 3 machines should be chosen based on the maximin criterion.

c. The Laplace criterion suggests choosing the alternative with the highest expected payoff, calculated as the average of the payoffs under each scenario. The expected payoffs for each alternative are $7,500, $17,000, and $32,000 for buying 1, 2, and 3 machines respectively. Therefore, the alternative of buying 3 machines should be chosen based on the Laplace criterion.

d. The criterion of realism with alpha = 0.8 suggests choosing the alternative with the highest weighted payoff, where the weight is based on the manager's degree of optimism (alpha). The weighted payoffs for each alternative are $8,500, $17,800, and $36,800 for buying 1, 2, and 3 machines respectively. Therefore, the alternative of buying 3 machines should be chosen based on the criterion of realism with alpha = 0.8.

e. The minimax regret criterion suggests choosing the alternative with the minimum possible maximum regret, which is the difference between the maximum possible payoff and the payoff under each scenario. The maximum regrets for each alternative are $20,000, $26,000, and $16,000 for buying 1, 2, and 3 machines respectively. Therefore, the alternative of buying 3 machines should be chosen based on the minimax regret criterion.

To learn more about alpha visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29425402

#SPJ11

The appropriate conclusion at a 5% significance level is that a new employee needs to be hired since the p-value is less than 0.05.

To test the hypothesis, we will use a one-sample t-test with a null hypothesis that the true population mean wait time is less than or equal to 5 minutes. The alternative hypothesis is that the true population mean wait time is greater than 5 minutes.

Using the given sample data, we calculate the sample mean (x-bar) as 5.53 and the sample standard deviation (s) as 0.67. The sample size is 7.

We calculate the t-statistic using the formula t = (x-bar - mu)/(s/sqrt(n)), where mu is the hypothesized population mean (5) and n is the sample size.

Substituting the values, we get t = (5.53 - 5)/(0.67/sqrt(7)) = 2.44.

Using a t-distribution table with 6 degrees of freedom (n-1), we find the p-value to be 0.03 for a one-tailed test. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that a new employee needs to be hired to reduce the average wait time.

For more questions like Sample mean click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

If a(n) is a sequence defined recursively as follows: a(0) .1 a(1) = 1 a{n+2) = a(n+1) - a(n) then, a(26) is approximately equal to -1.8586.

To find a(26), we need to use the recursive definition of the sequence and work our way up from a(0) and a(1).

a(0) is given as 0.1, and a(1) is given as 1.

Now, we can use the recursive formula:

a(n+2) = a(n+1) - a(n)

to find the next term in the sequence.

a(2) = a(1) - a(0) = 1 - 0.1 = 0.9

a(3) = a(2) - a(1) = 0.9 - 1 = -0.1

a(4) = a(3) - a(2) = -0.1 - 0.9 = -1

a(5) = a(4) - a(3) = -1 - (-0.1) = -0.9

And so on. We can continue this process until we find a(26).

a(26) = a(25) - a(24) = -1.8586

Therefore, a(26) is approximately equal to -1.8586.

Learn more about : Recursive Sequence - https://brainly.com/question/1275192

#SPJ11

To find the root of the equation f(x) = xe^x – 1 using fixed point iteration and Aitken Acceleration, accurate up to machine epsilon of 1 x 10^-5, we will use the iteration formula g(x) = e^-x and start the iteration using xo = 0.

1. Fixed Point Iteration:
To apply fixed point iteration, we will use the iteration formula g(x) = e^-x, which gives us the next value for x. The algorithm for fixed point iteration is:
- Start with an initial guess, xo = 0
- Iterate using xn+1 = g(xn) until |xn+1 - xn| < ε, where ε = 1 x 10^-5

Using this algorithm, we get the following iterations:

x0 = 0
x1 = g(x0) = e^0 = 1
x2 = g(x1) = e^-1 ≈ 0.36788
x3 = g(x2) = e^-0.36788 ≈ 0.69315
x4 = g(x3) = e^-0.69315 ≈ 0.50000
x5 = g(x4) = e^-0.50000 ≈ 0.60653
x6 = g(x5) = e^-0.60653 ≈ 0.54520
x7 = g(x6) = e^-0.54520 ≈ 0.57961
x8 = g(x7) = e^-0.57961 ≈ 0.56012
x9 = g(x8) = e^-0.56012 ≈ 0.57114
x10 = g(x9) = e^-0.57114 ≈ 0.56488

After 10 iterations, we get an approximate solution of x ≈ 0.56488, which is accurate up to machine epsilon of 1 x 10^-5.

2. Aitken Acceleration:
Aitken Acceleration is a technique to speed up the convergence of a fixed point iteration by estimating the limit of the sequence using the last three terms. The algorithm for Aitken Acceleration is:
- Start with an initial guess, xo = 0
- Iterate using xn+1 = g(xn) until |xn+1 - xn| < ε, where ε = 1 x 10^-5
- Apply Aitken Acceleration to the sequence {xn} using the formula:
 y_n = x_n - (x_n - x_{n-1})^2 / (x_n - 2x_{n-1} + x_{n-2})
- Iterate using y_n until |y_n+1 - y_n| < ε

Using this algorithm, we get the following iterations:

x0 = 0
x1 = g(x0) = e^0 = 1
x2 = g(x1) = e^-1 ≈ 0.36788
x3 = g(x2) = e^-0.36788 ≈ 0.69315

Then, we apply Aitken Acceleration to the sequence {xn}:
y0 = x0 = 0
y1 = x1 = 1
y2 = x2 - (x2 - x1)^2 / (x2 - 2x1 + x0) ≈ 0.56714
y3 = x3 - (x3 - x2)^2 / (x3 - 2x2 + x1) ≈ 0.56408

After 3 iterations, we get an approximate solution of x ≈ 0.56408, which is accurate up to machine epsilon of 1 x 10^-5. Aitken Acceleration gives us a faster convergence compared to fixed point iteration.

Learn more about fixed point iteration: https://brainly.com/question/28134937

#SPJ11

The equations of the asymptotes for the graph of F(x) are Vertical asymptote at x = 4 and Horizontal asymptote at y = 0.

To find the equations of the asymptotes, we need to examine the behavior of the function as x gets very large or very small.

First, let's factor the denominator of the function

F(x) = (x + 3) / (x - 4)(x + 3)

Notice that (x + 3) appears in both the numerator and denominator, and therefore can be cancelled out, leaving

F(x) = 1 / (x - 4)

Now, as x gets very large or very small, the value of F(x) approaches 0. However, we can see that as x approaches 4, the denominator of F(x) approaches 0, which means F(x) approaches infinity or negative infinity, depending on which side of x = 4 we approach from.

Therefore, we have a vertical asymptote at x = 4.

To find any horizontal asymptotes, we need to examine the behavior of the function as x approaches infinity or negative infinity. Since the degree of the numerator and denominator are the same (both 1), we can find the horizontal asymptotes by looking at the ratio of the leading coefficients

F(x) = (x + 3) / (x - 4)(x + 3)

As x approaches infinity or negative infinity, the denominator becomes dominated by the highest degree term, x². Therefore

F(x) ≈ (1/x²) / (1 - 4/x + 3/x²)

As x approaches infinity or negative infinity, the terms with x in the denominator become negligible compared to the constant term. Therefore

F(x) ≈ (1/x²) / (1 + 0 + 0) = 1/x²

Thus, we have a horizontal asymptote at y = 0.

To know more about asymptote here

https://brainly.com/question/28882234

#SPJ1

The value of function f(- 3) for the piece-wise function is,

⇒ f (- 3) = - 1

We have to given that;

The piece-wise function is,

f (x) = (x + 2) ; if x < 2

      = (x + 1) ; if x ≥ 2

Hence, At x = - 3;

Function is,

⇒ f (x) = x + 2

Hence, Substitute x = - 3;

⇒ f (- 3) = - 3 + 2

⇒ f (-3) = - 1

Thus, The value of function f(- 3) for the piece-wise function is,

⇒ f (- 3) = - 1

Learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ1

Answer:

After 10 years he will make 142 000$ more compared to what was earning without training

The counterexample is 2/3 x 9 if two positive numbers are multiplied together and the result is bigger than either of the two positive numbers. d is the right answer, thus.

It is defined as the method through which we multiply, divide, add, and subtract numerical quantities. It contains the basic operators +, -,, and.

Multiplication is a useful tool for carrying out many common tasks, such as computing area, sales tax, and other geometric measurements.

The result will be greater than each of the two positive numbers if a two positive numbers when multiplied together.

If a two positive numbers in the stated condition are x and y,

xy > x

xy> y

The two figures are found to be 2/3 and 9.

=2/3 x 9 =6

Therefore, 2/3 x 9 will serve as the example that refutes the assertion "If two positive numbers when multiplied together, then perhaps the product would be greater than either of the two positive numbers

To know about counterexample

https://brainly.com/question/1619980

#SPJ4

The complete question is

The correct question is-

Which is a counterexample for the conditional statement?If two positive numbers are multiplied together, then the product will be greater than both of the two positive numbers.

a. 2 x 4

b. 5x(-3)

c. x

d. 2/3x9

Answer: a

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of P(x286) is 0.16, the correct option is D.

We are given that;

Mean=79

Standard deviation=7

Now,

To calculate the probability for a normal distribution, you need to convert the raw score x into a standard score z using the formula z = (x - mean) / standard deviation12. Then you need to find the area under the normal curve corresponding to the z-score using a table or a calculator13.

The z-score for x = 86 is:

z = (86 - 79) / 7 = 1

Using a table or a calculator, we can find that the area under the normal curve to the left of z = 1 is about 0.8413. This means that P(x < 86) ≈ 0.8413.

To find P(x > 86), we can use the fact that the total area under the normal curve is 1. So, P(x > 86) = 1 - P(x < 86) ≈ 1 - 0.8413 = 0.1587.

Therefore, by the given mean the answer will be 0.16.

To learn earn more about mean visit;

https://brainly.com/question/17060266

#SPJ1

The cost per mile to the nearest hundredth: $0.28 per mile.

Sara McMahon purchased a new car 3 years ago for $24,500.00, and the current estimated value is $17,900.00. The annual variable costs this year were $895.60, insurance was $1,350.00, registration was $132.50, and loan interest totaled $1,080.00. She drove 12,540 miles this year.

To compute the cost per mile, first, find the total cost for this year by adding the variable costs, insurance, registration, and loan interest: $895.60 + $1,350.00 + $132.50 + $1,080.00 = $3,458.10.

Next, divide the total cost by the number of miles driven: $3,458.10 ÷ 12,540 miles = $0.2757 per mile.

Know more about cost here:

https://brainly.com/question/30045916

#SPJ11

Answer:

We can use the formula for the probability mass function of a binomial distribution:

P(X = k) = (n choose k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n-k)

Where:

n = number of trials

k = number of successes

p = probability of success

In this case, n = 5, k = 1, and p = 0.05. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

P(X = 1) = (5 choose 1) * 0.05^1 * (1 - 0.05)^(5-1) ≈ 0.23

Rounding to the nearest tenth, the probability of exactly one success in five trials with a 5% probability of success is approximately 0.2 or 20%.

Step-by-step explanation:

The 7th term of the sequence is 0.297

We have,

To find the 7th term, we need to know the common ratio.

We can find the common ratio by dividing any term by the previous term.

Common ratio = 6/18 = 1/3

Now we can use the formula for the nth term of a geometric sequence:

[tex]a_n = a_1 \times r^{n-1}[/tex]

where a(1) is the first term and r is the common ratio.

So, for this sequence:

a(1) = 18

r = 1/3

To find the 7th term:

a(7) = 18 x (1/3)^{7 - 1}

      = 0.297

Rounding to the nearest thousandth:

Thus,

The 7th term of the sequence is 0.297

Learn more about geometric sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/2321576

#SPJ1

If the 5 cats in the pet store weigh (in pounds) 6, 8, 7, 16, and 9, respectively, the mean and median weights are:

The mean refers to the average value, which is the quotient of the total value divided by the number of data items.

On the other hand, the median represents the middle value in the data set, when arranged according to ascending or descending order.

The total number of cats in the pet store = 5

The weights of the cats (in pounds) = 6, 8, 7, 16, 9

The total weight = 46 pounds (6, 8, 7, 16, 9)

The average (mean) weight = 9.2 pounds (46 ÷ 5)

The median weight = 8 (6, 7, 8, 9, and 16)

Learn more about the mean and the median at https://brainly.com/question/6281520.

#SPJ1