Find (a) the range and (b) the standard deviation of the data set 141,116,117,135,126,121 . Round to the nearest hundredth if necessary.

The equation without decimal and fraction is 20x = -39.

Given is an equation 5x/6 +2 = 3/8

So, [tex]\frac{5x}{6} +2 = \frac{3}{8} \\\\[/tex]

Multiply the equation by 48,

[tex]\frac{5x}{6} +2 = \frac{3}{8} \\\\40x + 96 = 18\\\\40x = -78\\\\\\20x = -39[/tex]

Hence the equation without decimal and fraction is 20x = -39.

Learn more about equation click;

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

The steps in order to solve the equation  5x + 4y = -14 and 3x + 6y =6 are step 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively.

The equations 5x + 4y = -14 and 3x + 6y = 6, we have to use the steps 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the same order as stated in the question.

First, multiply Equation 1 by -3 and Equation 2 by 5, respectively, to obtain -15x - 12y = -42 and 15x + 30y = 30.

Step 2: Combine Equations 1 and 2 to take the x-variable out, resulting in 15y=-12.

Step 3: Calculate y by multiplying both sides by 15, which results in y=-4/5.

Step 4: To solve for x, enter y=-4/5 into Equation 1 or Equation 2, which will result in x = 2.

So, the correct order of the steps to eliminate x from the given equations is 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively.

To know more about elimination method, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/25427192

#SPJ4

The radius of convergence doesn't exists, r, of the series n! x n: 6 × 13 × 20 × ⋯ × (7n − 1) as interval of convergence is (-1/7, 1/7).

To find the radius of convergence of the series, we can use the ratio test:

lim |a_{n+1}/a_n| = lim |(7(n+1)-1)/n+1| = 7

Since the limit exists and is finite, the series converges for |x| < 1/7. Therefore, the radius of convergence is r = 1/7.

To find the interval of convergence, we need to check the endpoints x = -1/7 and x = 1/7. When x = -1/7, the series becomes:

[tex](-1)^n[/tex] 6 × 13 × 20 × ⋯ × (7n − 1) n = 1

which does not converge since the terms do not approach zero. When x = 1/7, the series becomes:

6/7 × 13/7 × 20/7 × ⋯

which also does not converge since the terms do not approach zero. Therefore, the interval of convergence is (-1/7, 1/7).

Learn more about the radius of convergence at

https://brainly.com/question/31440916

#SPJ4

The question is -

Find the radius of convergence if exists, r, of the infinity series. n! x n: 6 × 13 × 20 × ⋯ × (7n − 1) n = 1 r = ? find the interval, i, of convergence of the series if exists and if it does mention the reason. (enter your answer using interval notation.)

The area the dog have to run around in is 28.26 square meters

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

His leash is 3 meters long and he runs around in circles

This means that

Radius, r = 3 meters

The area is calculated as

Area = 3.14r^2

So, we have

Area = 3.14 * 3^2

Evaluate

Area = 28.26

Hence, the area is 28.26 square meters

Read more about area at

https://brainly.com/question/24487155

#SPJ1

For a list size of 1000, the sequential search would make about 500 key.

The sequential search algorithm searches a list item by item until the desired item is found or the end of the list is reached. On average, for a list size of 1000, the sequential search would make about 500 key comparisons. Therefore, the correct answer is 500.

Here's a concise description of the sequential search algorithm:

1.Start at the beginning of the list.

2.Compare the target value with the current element.

3.If they match, return the current position.

4.If they don't match, move to the next element.

5.Repeat steps 2-4 until the target is found or the end of the list is reached.

If the target is not found, return a designated value (e.g., -1) to indicate its absence.

To know more about sequential search algorithm, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14291094

#SPJ11

We have a counterexample that shows the argument is invalid.

(a) Predicate Logic Formulas:

(P) B is the tallest person: ∀x [(x ≠ B) → T(B, x)]

(C) No one is taller than Bob and no one different from Bob is the same height as Bob: ∀x [(x ≠ B) → T(B, x)] ∧ ∀y [(y ≠ B ∧ ¬(y = B ∧ H(B, y))) → T(y, B)]

In (P), we have used the universal quantifier ∀ to express that the statement applies to all people x. The symbol ≠ denotes "not equal to", and the predicate T(a, b) represents "a is taller than b". So, the formula states that for all x, if x is not Bob, then Bob is taller than x.

In (C), we have combined two quantified statements using the conjunction operator ∧. The first statement ∀x [(x ≠ B) → T(B, x)] is the same as in (P), and it means that no one is taller than Bob. The second statement ∀y [(y ≠ B ∧ ¬(y = B ∧ H(B, y))) → T(y, B)] uses a new predicate symbol H(a,b) to represent "a is the same height as b". The formula says that for all y, if y is not Bob and y is not the same height as Bob, then y is shorter than Bob.

(b) The argument is invalid. To show this, we need to construct a model in which (P) is true and (C) is false. Let's consider a universe of discourse with three people: Alice, Bob, and Charlie. We can assign the following heights to them:

Alice is shorter than Bob

Bob is the same height as Charlie

So, we have H(A, B), ¬H(A, C), and H(B, C). Note that we have not specified the relative heights of Bob and Charlie, so they could be the same or Bob could be taller.

Now, let's interpret the predicate T(a, b) as "a is at least as tall as b", so T(B, A) and T(C, B). The formula for (P) is true in this model, since there is no person taller than Bob.

However, the formula for (C) is false, because Charlie is not shorter than Bob. In fact, they are the same height according to our assignment. So, we have a counterexample that shows the argument is invalid.

To learn more about invalid visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1150854

#SPJ11

You can take the reciprocal of the opportunity cost of producing Product A in terms of Product B to determine the cost of producing Product B in terms of Product A,

To determine the cost of producing Product B in terms of Product A, you can take the reciprocal of the opportunity cost of producing Product A in terms of Product B.

If the opportunity cost of producing 1 unit of Product A is 2 units of Product B, then the cost of producing 1 unit of Product B would be 1/2 unit of Product A.

To learn more on Equation:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

1. Yes

2. No

3. Yes

A function is a relationship with unique x-values.

Defining a Function

For a relationship to be a function, the x-values cannot repeat. This means that inputs, aka x-values, can only have one possible output value, also called y-values. For example, if inputting x = 5 resulted in both y = 3 and y = 7, then the relationship would not be a function.

However, y-values do not have to be unique. Functions can repeat y-values and still be functions.

Answers

Now, let's apply this definition to the problems above.

1. The first question gives us a table of x and y-values. From the x-values in the left column, we can see that x-values do not repeat. This means the relationship is a function.

2. The second question gives the inputs and outputs of a function. From looking at the outputs for 0, we can tell that x = 0 produces multiple outputs. This means that not all x-values are unique. Thus, the relationship is not a function.

3. The third image is a graph. At no point on the graph do x-values repeat. Each x-value has one y-value. So, the relationship is a function. Specifically, this graph represents a quadratic function.

The volume of the piñata is

1152 cubic in

The volume is solved by breaking the composite shape into two prisms

The volume is solved individually and then added together

Volume of square prism

= area x thickness

= 12 x 12 x 6

= 864 square in

Volume of triangular prism

= area x thickness

= 1/2 x 8 x 12 x 6

= 288 square in

The volume of the piñata

= 864 square in + 288 square in

= 1152 cubic in

Learn more about volume at

brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ1

The f'(x) has two x-intercepts, but f''(x) is always positive, indicating that f(x) has no relative extrema. This means that the function is either always increasing or always decreasing, and there are no maximum or minimum points.

The function f(x) =

[tex](1/3)x^3 - (2/7)x^2 - 1x[/tex]

has no relative extreme points. To find the relative extreme points of a function, we need to find the critical points where either the derivative f'(x) is equal to zero or the second derivative f''(x) is equal to zero.

Taking the derivative of f(x), we get f'(x) = x^2 - (4/7)x - 1. Setting f'(x) equal to zero and solving for x, we get x =

[tex](2 ± \sqrt{} (30))/7[/tex]

Upon further analysis of the second derivative f''(x) = 2x - (4/7), we see that it is always positive for all values of x.

There are no relative extreme points as the function f(x) does not have any points where the slope is zero and the curvature changes from positive to negative or vice versa.

Learn more about x-intercepts here:

https://brainly.com/question/12791065

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the present value and the lower-cost choice for two payment plans:

The present value of 20 semiannual payments of $2500 discounted at the rate of 5% can be found by a financial calculator to be $38,973. Together with the $7500 down payment, the present value of Option 2 is ...

  Option 2 = $7500 +38,973 = $46,473

The present value of $30,000 cash is $30,000.

Option 1 has a present value of $30,000.

Option 2 has a present value of $46,473.

Option 1 will save your parents the most money.

__

Additional comment

The total cash outlay for option 2 is $7500 + 20×2500 = $57,500. For this option to be the same cost as option 1, the account would need to earn interest at the rate of 18.4%.

There are various ways to estimate the interest earned. One of them is to compute half the value of simple interest on the interval. That is, the interest could be estimated as (1/2)(5%/yr)(10 yr) = 25%. This suggests the PV would be about 1/1.25 times the sum of payments, or 40000. That's close enough to the actual value of 39000 to tell you that Option 1 is the better choice.

The calculated value of the variable x in the figure is 6 degrees

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The figure

By the given congruent angles, we have the following equation

9x - 14 = 6x + 4

Collect the like terms in the equation

so, we have the following representation

9x - 6x = 14 + 4

Evaluate the like terms

So, the equation becomes

3x = 18

Divide both sides of the equation by 3

x = 6

Hence, the value of the variable x in the figure is 6

Read mroe about angles at

https://brainly.com/question/28293784

#SPJ1

The values of x and y are 16 and 16√3 respectively

The special angles on the unit circle refer to the angles that have corresponding coordinates which can be solved with the Pythagorean Theorem.

These special angles includes: 30°,45°, and 60°

sin 30 = 1/2, cos 60 = 1/2 , cos 30 = √3/2 , sin60 = √3/2 e.t.c

therefore,

sin30 = x/32

1/2 = x/32

2x = 32

x = 32/2 = 16

cos 30 = adj/hyp

√3/2 = y/32

2y = 32√3

y = 32√3/2

y = 16√3

therefore the values of x and y are 16 and 16√3 respectively.

learn more about special angles from

https://brainly.com/question/25770607

#SPJ1

There are 56 ways to choose and order one starter and one reserve player from a group of 8 players.

The number of ways to choose and order one starter and one reserve player from a group of 8 players can be calculated using the multiplication principle of counting.

First, we can choose one player to be the starter in 8 ways. Then, we can choose one player from the remaining 7 players to be the reserve in 7 ways.

Using the multiplication principle, we multiply the number of ways to choose the starter by the number of ways to choose the reserve to get the total number of ways to choose and order one starter and one reserve player from 8 players:

8 × 7 = 56

Therefore, there are 56 ways to choose and order one starter and one reserve player from a group of 8 players.

To learn more about multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2432727

#SPJ11

a. we are 99% confident that the true population mean time Americans spend eating or drinking per day falls between 1.166 and 1.274 hours.

b.  There will be 70 sample is required to estimate the mean time Americans spend eating or drinking per day within 15 minutes of the true mean and with 95% confidence

(a) To construct a 99% confidence interval for the mean time Americans spend eating or drinking per day, we can use the formula:

CI = x ± z*(σ/√n)

where x is the sample mean, σ is the population standard deviation (which is unknown, so we use the sample standard deviation), n is the sample size, and z* is the critical value for a 99% confidence interval (which we can find using a table or calculator).

Plugging in the values given, we get:

CI = 1.22 ± 2.58*(0.65/√1001) ≈ 1.22 ± 0.054

So the 99% confidence interval for the mean time Americans spend eating or drinking per day is (1.166, 1.274) hours.

We can interpret this interval as saying that we are 99% confident that the true population mean time Americans spend eating or drinking per day falls between 1.166 and 1.274 hours.

(b) To find the sample size required to estimate the mean time Americans spend eating or drinking per day within 15 minutes of the true mean with 95% confidence, we can use the formula:

n = (z*σ/E)^2

where E is the margin of error (which is 15 minutes = 0.25 hours), z* is the critical value for a 95% confidence interval (which is 1.96), and σ is the sample standard deviation (which is 0.65).

Plugging in the values given, we get:

n = (1.96*0.65/0.25)^2 ≈ 69.88

So we need a sample size of at least 70 to estimate the mean time Americans spend eating or drinking per day within 15 minutes of the true mean with 95% confidence.

To know more about confidence intervals follow

brainly.com/question/29579690

#SPJ11

Answer: 0.045%

Step-by-step explanation:

The science textbook has a greater volume than the math textbook, so option D is correct, the science textbook, with a volume of 2268 cm³.

The volume of a rectangular prism is given by the formula V = lwh, where l is the length, w is the width, and h is the height.

Using this formula, we can calculate the volumes of the math and science textbooks:

Math textbook:

V = 22 cm × 27 cm ×  3.5 cm

= 2079 cm³

Science textbook:

V = 21 cm ×  27 cm ×  4 cm

= 2268 cm³

Therefore, the science textbook has a greater volume than the math textbook, so option D is correct, the science textbook, with a volume of 2268 cm³.

To learn more on Three dimensional figure click:

https://brainly.com/question/2400003

#SPJ1

Question consists of two statements and you want to know if they are true or false.

1. "A system can be defined as any set of independent parts performing a specific function or set of functions."

Answer: True. A system can indeed be defined as a set of independent parts that work together to perform a specific function or set of functions.

2. "Variation in a system can be maximized by standardizing operations."

Answer: False. Variation in a system is actually minimized by standardizing operations. Standardizing operations helps to reduce variability and increase consistency in a system's performance.

To know more about "Functions" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28193995#

#SPJ11

The volume of the given cube is determined as (q cm)³.

The volume of a cube is calculated from the cube its edge length.

Mathematically, the formula for the volume of a cube is calculated by applying the following formula.

V = L x L x L = L³

where;

The volume of the given cube is calculated as follows;

V = q cm  x q cm x q cm

V = (q cm)³

Learn more about volume here: https://brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ1

Based on the above, the cost to purchase 1 point is $2,700.

In order to know  the expense of acquiring 1 point, it is imperative to ascertain the extent by which the interest rate would decrease through the purchase of 1 point.

The purchasing  of each point results in a 0.125% reduction of the interest rate, so rate of interest shall be:

4.8% - 0.125%

= 4.675%

So, the cost of 1 point is 1% of the amount borrowed, that is $270,000. hence, the cost of 1 point is:

1% x $270,000

= $2,700

Therefore, the cost to purchase 1 point is $2,700.

Learn more about cost  from

https://brainly.com/question/29509552

#SPJ1

The surface area of the box is 954 in².

Option D is the correct answer.

We have,

The surface area of a rectangular prism is the sum of the areas of all its faces.

The box has six faces, and each face is a rectangle.

The top and bottom faces have dimensions of 24 inches by 15 inches,

So each has an area of:

24 in × 15 in

= 360 in²

There are two of these faces, so their combined area is:

2 × 360 in²

= 720 in²

The front and back faces have dimensions of 24 inches by 3 inches,

So each has an area of:

24 in × 3 in

= 72 in²

There are two of these faces, so their combined area is:

2 × 72 in²

= 144 in²

The left and right faces have dimensions of 15 inches by 3 inches, so each has an area of:

15 in × 3 in

= 45 in²

There are two of these faces, so their combined area is:

2 × 45 in² = 90 in²

Adding up all the face areas gives:

720 + 144 + 90

= 954 in²

Therefore,

The surface area of the box is 954 in².

Learn more about Prism here:

https://brainly.com/question/12649592

#SPJ1

1) The sample proportion is 0.14 (7 left-handed students out of 50 total students surveyed).
2) The hypothesized proportion po is 0.10 (the usual proportion of left-handed students).
3) The sample size n is 50 (the number of students surveyed).
4) The test statistic z is 1.32.

1) The sample proportion is calculated by dividing the number of left-handed students by the total number of students surveyed. In this case, 7 left-handed students out of 50 gives a sample proportion of 7/50 = 0.14.
2) The hypothesized proportion (p₀) is the usual proportion of left-handed students, which is given as 0.10.
3) The sample size (n) is the total number of students surveyed, which is 50.
4) The test statistic (z) can be calculated using the formula: z = (sample proportion - hypothesized proportion) / sqrt((hypothesized proportion * (1 - hypothesized proportion)) / sample size). In this case, z = (0.14 - 0.10) / sqrt((0.10 * (1 - 0.10)) / 50) = 0.04 / sqrt(0.09 / 50) ≈ 0.943.
To calculate the test statistic z, we use the formula:

z = (sample proportion - hypothesized proportion) / standard error

The standard error is calculated as:

standard error = sqrt((po * (1-po)) / n)

Plugging in the values, we get:

standard error = sqrt((0.10 * (1-0.10)) / 50) = 0.0499

Then,

z = (0.14 - 0.10) / 0.0499 = 1.32

Since the calculated z-value of 1.32 is greater than the critical value of 1.645 (using a significance level of 0.05 for a two-tailed test), we can conclude that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the proportion of left-handed students at the school is the same as the usual proportion of 0.10.

To learn more about hypothesized proportion, click here:

brainly.com/question/28187749

#SPJ11

Answer:

a. The number of different combinations of 2 components that can be chosen from a group of 12 is given by the formula:

nC2 = (n!)/(2!(n-2)!), where n is the total number of components

Substituting n = 12, we get:

nC2 = (12!)/(2!(12-2)!) = (12 x 11)/2 = 66

Therefore, there are 66 different combinations of 2 components that can be chosen from the group of 12.

b. The probability that the faulty component will be chosen for testing depends on the number of ways in which the faulty component can be chosen, and the total number of ways in which any 2 components can be chosen.

The probability of choosing the faulty component on the first pick is 1/12, as there is one faulty component out of a total of 12 components.

After the first component has been picked, there will be 11 components left, including one faulty component. Therefore, the probability of picking the faulty component on the second pick, given that the first pick did not pick the faulty component, is 1/11.

Therefore, the probability of picking the faulty component on either the first or second pick is:

P(faulty component) = P(faulty on first pick) + P(faulty on second pick, given not picked on first pick)

P(faulty component) = (1/12) + ((11/12) x (1/11))

P(faulty component) = 1/12 + 1/12

P(faulty component) = 1/6

Therefore, the probability of choosing the faulty component for testing is 1/6 or approximately 0.1667.

If this person, who wants to retire at age 65, had started with the same yearly contribution at age 40, the difference in the account balances (future values) would be D. $137,435.93.

The future values can be computed using an online finance calculator as follows:

N (# of periods) = 30 years (65 - 35)

I/Y (Interest per year) = 6.5%

PV (Present Value) = $0

PMT (Periodic Payment) = $5,000

Results:

Future Value (FV) = $431,874.32

Sum of all periodic payments = $150,000.00

Total Interest = $281,874.32

N (# of periods) = 25 years (65 - 40)

I/Y (Interest per year) = 6.5%

PV (Present Value) = $0

PMT (Periodic Payment) = $5,000

Results:

Future Value (FV) = $294,438.39

Sum of all periodic payments = $125,000.00

Total Interest = $169,438.39

Difference in future values = $137,435.93 ($431,874.32 - $294,438.39)

Learn more about future values at https://brainly.com/question/24703884.

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Make an equation. To stay balanced the sum of everything on the left must equal the value on the right.

2 + x + 2 + x + 2 + x + 2 + x + 2 + x = 11

2. Add all like terms. We have 2+2+2+2+2 = 10 and x+x+x+x+x=5x so the equation simplifies to

10 + 5x = 11

3. Substract 10 from both sides

10 - 10 + 5x = 11 - 10

0 + 5x = 1

5x = 1

4. Divide the number being multiplied by x from both sides

5x/5 = 1/5

x = 1/5  or x = 0.2

Answer:

The answer to your problem is, B.

Step-by-step explanation:

The sizes what are given.

There are:

3  - 9's

3  - 8's

1  - 7

2 -10's

1-11

Which concludes to the second graph has the right amount of x's for the given shoe sizes.

Thus the answer to you problem is, B

The probability for each k value is from 15 to 25 and sum them up to get the final probability.

The situation you described is not a geometric distribution. Instead, it follows a binomial distribution. A binomial distribution is appropriate here because we have a fixed number of trials (25 coin flips), each trial has two outcomes (heads or tails), and the probability of success (getting heads) remains constant throughout the trials.

To calculate the probability of getting 15 or more heads in 25 coin flips, you can use the binomial formula:

[tex]P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^{(n-k)}[/tex]

where n is the number of trials (25), k is the number of successful outcomes (15 or more), p is the probability of success (0.5 for a fair coin), and C(n, k) represents the number of combinations of n items taken k at a time.

You'll need to calculate the probability for each k value from 15 to 25 and sum them up to get the final probability.

learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Answer:

The sum of two dice can range from 2 to 12. To get a sum of 3, the only possible combinations are (1,2) and (2,1), since there is only one way to get each of those sums.

There are a total of 6 x 6 = 36 possible outcomes when two dice are rolled, since each die has 6 possible outcomes.

Therefore, the probability of rolling a sum of 3 is:

P(D1 + D2 = 3) = number of ways to get a sum of 3 / total number of possible outcomes

P(D1 + D2 = 3) = 2 / 36

Simplifying by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 2, we get:

P(D1 + D2 = 3) = 1 / 18

Therefore, the probability of rolling a sum of 3 with two standard dice is 1/18.

Step-by-step explanation:

in answer :)

Answer:

1/18

Step-by-step explanation:

got it right

The probability that it will take less than 63 minutes to complete the test is 0.1016, which corresponds to option c) in your list.

To solve this problem, we first need to standardize the value of 63 minutes using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where:
x = 63 (the given value)
μ = 77 (the mean)
σ = 11 (the standard deviation)

Plugging in these values, we get:

z = (63 - 77) / 11
z = -1.27

Next, we use a standard normal distribution table (or a calculator) to find the probability that a standard normal variable is less than -1.27. The table gives us a probability of approximately 0.1016.

However, we are not dealing with a standard normal distribution, but rather a normal distribution with a specific mean and standard deviation. To account for this, we need to use the following formula:

P(X < 63) = P(Z < -1.27) = Φ(-1.27)

where Φ is the standard normal cumulative distribution function. Using a standard normal distribution table (or a calculator), we find that Φ(-1.27) is approximately 0.1016.

Therefore, the answer is (c) 0.1016.

You can learn more about probability at: brainly.com/question/23704607

#SPJ11

Answer:

There are two terms in the simplest form of the product (x + y)(a + b):

The first term is the product of x and a, which is xa.

The second term is the product of y and b, which is yb.

So, the simplified product is xa + yb. Therefore, the answer is A. 2.