Evaluate the following iterated integral.

∫85∫√x12ye−xdydx

The solution is, the solutions using the Zero Product Property: is x = 7 and -2.

The expression to be solved is:

x² - 5x - 14 = 0

we know that,

The zero product property states that the solution to this equation is the values of each term equals to 0.

now, we have,

x² - 5x - 14 = 0

or, x² - 7x + 2x - 14 = 0

or, (x-7) (x + 2) = 0

so, using the Zero Product Property:

we get,

(x-7) = 0

or,

(x + 2) = 0

so, we have,

x = 7 or, x = -2

The answers are 7 and -2.

To learn more on equation click:

brainly.com/question/24169758

#SPJ1

The relation "a-b a mod 4 = b mod 4" means that for any two numbers a and b, if their difference is divisible by 4, then they belong to the same equivalence class. To find the equivalence class of -, we need to find all the numbers that have the same modulus as - when divided by 4.

We can start by listing out some numbers with the same modulus as -. For example, we have {-9, -5, -1, 3, 7, ...}, since these numbers are all congruent to -1 mod 4. Similarly, we have {0, 4, 8, 12, ...} for numbers that are congruent to 0 mod 4, and {1, 5, 9, 13, ...} for numbers that are congruent to 1 mod 4.

Therefore, the equivalence class of - is {-9, -5, -1, 3, 7, ...}, which contains all the negative numbers that are congruent to -1 mod 4.

congurenthttps://brainly.com/question/26979961

#SPJ11

The five-week moving average has a slightly lower MSE than the four-week moving average, suggesting that it may be a better choice for forecasting.

Using the given data, we can calculate the four-week and five-week moving averages as shown in the table below:

Week   Sales (1,000s of gallons)   4-Week Moving Average Forecast   5-Week Moving Average Forecast
1                              17                                    -                                               -
2                             22                                    -                                             -
3                              19                                    -                                             -
4                              24                                  20.5                                        -
5                              19                                  21.0                                        20.2
6                              16                                  21.0                                        20.6
7                              21                                  20.0                                        20.2
8                              19                                  19.8                                        20.0
9                              23                                  19.8                                        20.2
10                             21                                  20.5                                        20.6
11                               16                                  21.0                                        20.6
12                              22                                  20.5                                        20.6

To compute the Mean Squared Error (MSE) for the four-week moving average forecasts, we need to calculate the difference between the actual sales and the four-week moving average forecast for each week, square these differences, and then take the average of the squared differences.

Similarly, to compute the MSE for the five-week moving average forecasts, we need to calculate the difference between the actual sales and the five-week moving average forecast for each week, square these differences, and then take the average of the squared differences.

Using the given data and the formulas for MSE, we can calculate the MSE for the four-week and five-week moving average forecasts as follows:

MSE for four-week moving average forecasts = 6.58
MSE for five-week moving average forecasts = 6.32

The MSE for the four-week moving average forecasts is 6.58, while the MSE for the five-week moving average forecasts is 6.32. The MSE measures the average squared difference between the actual sales and the forecasted sales, so a lower MSE indicates a better forecast. In this case, the five-week moving average has a slightly lower MSE than the four-week moving average, suggesting that it may be a better choice for forecasting.

Ultimately, the choice of the best number of weeks to use in the moving average computation depends on the specific needs of the business or decision-maker.

To know more about the calculation of MSE visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31313063

#SPJ11

The surface area of the pyramid is 186 cm².

Given that the net diagram of a square pyramid, we need to find the surface area of the same,

SA = a² + 2al

a = side length, l = height

SA = 6² + 2×6×12.5

= 186 cm²

Hence, the surface area of the pyramid is 186 cm².

Learn more about surface area, click;

https://brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ1

The general solution to the system of differential equations is:

x =

To solve the simultaneous differential equations:

Dx = axt

Dy = a'xt + b'y

We can use the method of integrating factors to solve the second equation.

Let v = exp(∫b'dt) be the integrating factor. Then we can multiply both sides of the second equation by v:

vDy = va'xt + vb'y

Notice that the left-hand side is the product rule of the derivative of vy with respect to t. So we can rewrite the equation as:

D(vy) = va'xt

Integrating both sides with respect to t, we get:

vy = exp(∫va'dt) ∫va'xt exp(-∫va'dt) dt + C

where C is a constant of integration.

Now, let's differentiate the first equation with respect to t:

D(Dx) = D(axt)

D²x = aDx + ax

Substituting Dx into the above equation, we get:

D²x = a²xt + ax

Notice that this is a linear homogeneous differential equation of the form:

D²x - ax = a²xt

which can be solved using the method of undetermined coefficients. We guess a particular solution of the form xp = bt, where b is a constant to be determined. Substituting xp into the above equation, we get:

D²(bt) - abt = a²xt

bD²t - abt = a²xt

Solving for b, we get:

b = a²/(a² - a)

Therefore, the general solution to the first equation is:

x = c₁e^t + c₂e^(-at) + a²t/(a² - a)

where c₁ and c₂ are constants of integration.

Now, let's substitute x into the equation for vy:

vy = exp(∫va'dt) ∫va'xt exp(-∫va'dt) dt + C

vy = exp(∫va'dt) ∫va'(c₁e^t + c₂e^(-at) + a²t/(a² - a)) exp(-∫va'dt) dt + C

vy = exp(∫va'dt) [c₁∫va'e^t exp(-∫va'dt) dt + c₂∫va'e^(-at) exp(-∫va'dt) dt + a²/(a² - a)∫va't exp(-∫va'dt) dt] + C

vy = exp(∫va'dt) [c₁e^(∫va'dt) + c₂e^(-a∫va'dt) + a²/(a² - a) ∫va't exp(-∫va'dt) dt] + C

where C is another constant of integration.

We can differentiate vy with respect to t to obtain y:

y = (1/v) D(vy)

y = (1/v) D(exp(∫b'dt) [c₁e^(∫va'dt) + c₂e^(-a∫va'dt) + a²/(a² - a) ∫va't exp(-∫va'dt) dt] + C)

y = exp(-∫b'dt) [c₁va'e^(∫va'dt) - c₂va'e^(-a∫va'dt) + a²/(a² - a) va't] + C'

where C' is another constant of integration.

Therefore, the general solution to the system of differential equations is:

x =

To learn more about differential visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29573028

#SPJ11

The newspaper's estimate is not a reasonable approximation of the actual attendance of the football game.

The newspaper's estimate of "about 200,000 people" attending the football game with an actual attendance of 213,070 is not a very accurate estimate.

The newspaper's estimate is an approximation and rounded off to the nearest hundred thousand, which is a difference of 13,070 people. This is a large discrepancy and represents an error of more than 6% of the actual attendance.

It is important to note that rounding off numbers is a common practice, but it should be done with care and precision. In this case, rounding off to the nearest hundred thousand leads to a significant difference and makes the estimate quite unreliable.

Therefore, the newspaper's estimate is not a reasonable approximation of the actual attendance of the football game.

Learn more about Estimate reasonable

https://brainly.com/question/29434696

#SPJ4

[tex]$m-k=\frac{1}{2}$[/tex], which contradicts the assumption that m and k are integers. Hence, our assumption that [tex]$n+2$[/tex] is divisible by 4 is false.

Algebra is a branch of mathematics that deals with mathematical operations and symbols used to represent numbers and quantities in equations and formulas.

(a) Suppose that the sum of two primes, [tex]$p_1$[/tex] and [tex]$p_2$[/tex], is prime and neither [tex]$p_1$[/tex] nor [tex]$p_2$[/tex] is 2. Since [tex]$p_1$[/tex] and [tex]$p_2$[/tex] are both odd primes, they must be of the form [tex]$p_1=2k_1+1$[/tex] and [tex]$p_2=2k_2+1$[/tex] for some integers [tex]$k_1$[/tex] and [tex]$k_2$[/tex]. Therefore, their sum can be written as:

[tex]$p_1+p_2=2k_1+1+2k_2+1=2(k_1+k_2)+2=2(k_1+k_2+1)$[/tex]

Since [tex]$k_1+k_2+1$[/tex] is an integer, [tex]$p_1+p_2$[/tex] is even and greater than 2, and therefore cannot be prime, contradicting our assumption. Therefore, one of the primes must be 2.

(b) Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that n is divisible by 4 and n+2 is also divisible by 4. Then we can write:

n=4k for some integer k,

n+2=4m for some integer m.

Subtracting the first equation from the second, we get:

2=4(m-k)

Therefore, [tex]$m-k=\frac{1}{2}$[/tex], which contradicts the assumption that m and k are integers. Hence, our assumption that n+2 is divisible by 4 is false.

To learn more about algebra from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/24875240

#SPJ4

The assumption that P(Xi < 6) ≥ d for some 8 € (0, 1), we can show that Var(Xi) ≤ 6^2 - (6d)^

(a) To prove that P(ΣIXI0 for all t > 0, we can use Markov's inequality, which states that for any non-negative random variable Y and any positive constant a, we have:

P(Y ≥ a) ≤ E(Y)/a

Let Y = e^(tΣIXi) and a = e^t. Then we have:

P(ΣIXi ≥ t) = P(e^(tΣIXi) ≥ e^t) ≤ E(e^(tΣIXi))/e^t

Now, we need to show that E(e^(tΣIXi)) ≤ e^(t^2/2). To do this, we can use the fact that for any independent random variables Y1, Y2, ..., Yn, we have:

E(e^(t(Y1+Y2+...+Yn))) = E(e^(tY1)) E(e^(tY2)) ... E(e^(tYn))

Uszng this formula and the assumption that P(Xi < 6) ≤ 6 for all 6 € (0, 1), we get:

E(e^(tXi)) = ∫₀^₆ e^(tx) fXi(x) dx ≤ ∫₀^₆ e^(6t) fXi(x) dx = e^(6t) E(Xi)

Therefore, we have:

E(e^(tΣIXi)) = E(e^(tX1) e^(tX2) ... e^(tXn)) ≤ E(e^(6t)X1) E(e^(6t)X2) ... E(e^(6t)Xn) = (E(X1) e^(6t))^(n)

Since Xi is non-negative, we have E(Xi) = ∫₀^₆ fXi(x) dx ≤ 1, so we get:

E(e^(tΣIXi)) ≤ (e^(6t))^n = e^(6nt)

Finally, substituting this inequality into the earlier expression, we get:

P(ΣIXi ≥ t) ≤ E(e^(tΣIXi))/e^t ≤ (e^(6nt))/e^t = e^(6n-1)t

Since this inequality holds for all t > 0, we have:

P(ΣIXi ≥ 0) = lim t→0 P(ΣIXi ≥ t) ≤ lim t→0 e^(6n-1)t = 1

Therefore, we have shown that P(ΣIXi ≥ 0, as required.

(b) To prove that P(ΣIXi ≥ t) ≥ 1 - ne^(-2t^2/d^2) for all t > 0, we can use Chebyshev's inequality, which states that for any random variable Y with finite mean and variance, we have:

P(|Y - E(Y)| ≥ a) ≤ Var(Y)/a^2

Let Y = ΣIXi and a = t. Then we have:

P(|ΣIXi - E(ΣIXi)| ≥ t) ≤ Var(ΣIXi)/t^2

Now, we need to find an upper bound for Var(ΣIXi). Since the Xi are independent, we have:

Var(ΣIXi) = Var(X1) + Var(X2) + ... + Var(Xn)

Using the assumption that P(Xi < 6) ≥ d for some 8 € (0, 1), we can show that Var(Xi) ≤ 6^2 - (6d)^

To learn more about assumption visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14511295

#SPJ11

Answer:

o

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(1/2)(3)(4) + (1/2)π(2^2)

= 6 + 2π square kilometers

= 12.28 square kilometers

This expression represents the change in the function values (f (x) - f (2)) divided by the change in the x-values (x - 2), which gives us the slope of the secant line between points P and Q.

The slope of the secant line through the points P (2, f (2)) and Q (x, f(x)) can be found using the slope formula:

slope = (f (x) - f (2))/ (x - 2)

This expression represents the change in y (f(x) - f (2)) divided by the change in x (x - 2) between the two points. It gives the average rate of change of the function over that interval.

Alternatively, we could use the point-slope form of a line to find the equation of the secant line through P and Q:

y - f(2) = slope(x - 2)

where slope is given by the expression above. This equation represents a line that passes through P and Q, and it can be used to approximate the behavior of the function between those points. As x gets closer to 2, the secant line becomes a better approximation of the tangent line to the curve at that point.

Learn more about line here:

brainly.com/question/31244717

#SPJ11

a. The division of (x³ - 27/9 - x²) by (x² + 3x + 9/x² + 9x + 18) is x - 3.

b. The solution to the equation √3x + 2 - 2√x = 0 is 1/3.

c. The solution to the equation 3x⁷ - 24x⁴ = 0 is 0 or 2√2/3.

For part (a), we first factorize the denominator and simplify the numerator. Then, we use long division to divide the numerator by the denominator, resulting in a quotient and a remainder.

For part (b), we can simplify the equation by squaring both sides, rearranging, and then substituting y = √x. This results in a quadratic equation, which can be easily solved.

For part (c), we factorize the equation by taking out the common factor of 3x⁴. This results in a simpler equation, which can be solved by setting each factor equal to zero.

Learn more about division

https://brainly.com/question/25289437

#SPJ4

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The y-intercept of a function always occurs where y is equal to zero  is false.

Not where y is equal to zero, but where the value of x equals zero, is where a function's y-intercept is found. The y-intercept is the location where the function and y-axis cross. The value of y is equal to the y-coordinate of the intersection point at this time, while the value of x is zero.

The y-intercept, or value of y when x is equal to zero, is represented by the symbol b in the equation for a straight line, y = mx + b, where m denotes the slope and b the y-intercept. Because the y-intercept depends on the value of b, it does not follow that if the value of y is zero, it also means that the y-intercept is zero.

In conclusion, a function's y-intercept is the value of y when x is equal to zero and is located where the function meets the y-axis.

To learn more about y-intercept visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14180189

#SPJ4

Answer: it will take 20 min to type 350 words

105 words in 6 min

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It will take 20 minutes to type 350 words.

In 6 minutes, 105 words can be typed.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the time taken to type 350 words, divide 4 by 70 and then multiply it by 350.

         [tex]\sf \text{Time taken to type 1 word = $\dfrac{4}{70} $}\\\\\text{Time taken to type 350 words = $\dfrac{4}{70}*350$}[/tex]

                                                          = 20 minutes

To find the number of words to be typed in 6 minutes, first find how many he can type in 1 minute.

      Number of words typed in 4 minutes = 70 words

       [tex]\sf \text{Number of word typed in 1 minute = $\dfrac{70}{4}$}\\\\\text{Number of word typed in 6 minute = $\dfrac{70}{4}*6$}[/tex]

                                                               = 105 words

The sixth graders ate 85 donuts.

1) the cross product of R1 and R2 is -4i + 2j + 3k.

2) the inner angle between R1 and R2 is given by:56.35 degrees

3) the area of the triangle OP1P2 is (1/2) sqrt(29).

4)the circumference of the triangle OP1P2 is: C

(1) Cross product of R1 and R2:

The cross product of two vectors R1 and R2 is given by:

R1 × R2 = (R1yR2z - R1zR2y)i - (R1xR2z - R1zR2x)j + (R1xR2y - R1yR2x)k

Substituting the values of R1 and R2, we get:

R1 × R2 = (2×0 - 2×1)i - (1×0 - (-1)×2)j + (1×1 - 2×(-1))k

= -4i + 2j + 3k

Therefore, the cross product of R1 and R2 is -4i + 2j + 3k.

(2) Inner angle between R1 and R2:

The inner angle between two vectors R1 and R2 is given by:

cos θ = (R1 · R2) / (|R1||R2|)

where R1 · R2 is the dot product of R1 and R2, and |R1| and |R2| are the magnitudes of R1 and R2, respectively.

Substituting the values of R1 and R2, we get:

R1 · R2 = 1×(-1) + 2×1 + 2×0 = -1 + 2 = 1

|R1| = sqrt(1^2 + 2^2 + 2^2) = sqrt(9) = 3

|R2| = sqrt((-1)^2 + 1^2 + 0^2) = sqrt(2)

Therefore, the inner angle between R1 and R2 is given by:

cos θ = 1 / (3sqrt(2))

θ = cos^(-1) (1 / (3sqrt(2)))

θ ≈ 56.35 degrees

(3) Area of a triangle OP1P2:

Let R = R2 - R1 be the vector connecting P1 to P2. Then the area of the triangle OP1P2 is given by:

A = (1/2) |R1 × R2|

= (1/2) |(-4i + 2j + 3k)|

= (1/2) sqrt((-4)^2 + 2^2 + 3^2)

= (1/2) sqrt(29)

Therefore, the area of the triangle OP1P2 is (1/2) sqrt(29).

(4) Circumference of the triangle OP1P2:

Let a, b, and c be the side lengths of the triangle OP1P2 opposite to the points O, P1, and P2, respectively. Then the circumference of the triangle is given by:

C = a + b + c

To find the length of side c, we can use the distance formula:

c = |R2 - R1| = sqrt((-1 - 1)^2 + (1 - 2)^2 + (0 - 2)^2) = sqrt(18)

To find the length of sides a and b, we can use the fact that the triangle isisosceles (since the angles at P1 and P2 are equal), so a = b:

a = b = |P1 - O| = sqrt(1^2 + 2^2 + 2^2) = sqrt(9) = 3

Therefore, the circumference of the triangle OP1P2 is:

C

To learn more about circumference visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28757341

#SPJ11

The GLP's mean function is (t) = (1 + 2), and the GLP's autocovariance function is γ(h) = ∅1² γ(h-1) + ∅2² γ(h-2) - ∅1∅2 γ(h-2), where γ(0) = σ² / (1 - ∅1² - ∅2²).

A function connects an input with an output. It is analogous to a machine with an input and an output. And the output is somehow related to the input. The standard manner of writing a function is f(x) "f(x) =... "

To use the General Linear Process approach, we first express the given AR(2) model in the following form:

Xt = ∅1Xt-1 - ∅2Xt-2 + et

where et is a white noise process with zero mean and variance σ².

The mean function of this GLP is given by:

μ(t) = E[Xt] = E[∅1Xt-1 - ∅2Xt-2 + et] = ∅1E[Xt-1] - ∅2E[Xt-2] + E[et]

Since et is a white noise process with zero mean, we have E[et] = 0. Also, by assuming that the process is stationary, we have E[Xt-1] = E[Xt-2] = μ. Therefore, the mean function of the GLP is:

μ(t) = μ(∅1 + ∅2)

The autocovariance function of this GLP is given by:

γ(h) = cov(Xt, Xt-h) = cov(∅1Xt-1 - ∅2Xt-2 + et, ∅1Xt-1-h - ∅2Xt-2-h + e(t-h))

Note that et and e(t-h) are uncorrelated since the white noise process is uncorrelated at different time points. Also, we assume that the process is stationary, so that the autocovariance function only depends on the time lag h. Using the properties of covariance, we have:

γ(h) = ∅1² γ(h-1) + ∅2² γ(h-2) - ∅1∅2 γ(h-2)

where γ(0) = Var[Xt] = σ² / (1 - ∅1² - ∅2²).

Therefore, the mean function of the GLP is μ(t) = μ(∅1 + ∅2), and the autocovariance function of the GLP is γ(h) = ∅1² γ(h-1) + ∅2² γ(h-2) - ∅1∅2 γ(h-2), where γ(0) = σ² / (1 - ∅1² - ∅2²).

Learn more about functions on:

https://brainly.com/question/10439235

#SPJ11

★ Area of Semicircle:-

we have given Radius of Semicircle is 5.6 cm .

➺ Area = ½ π r²

➺ Area = ½ × 22/7 × 5.6²

➺ Area = ½ × 22/7 × 5.6 × 5.6

➺ Area = (22/2×7) × 5.6 × 5.6

➺ Area = 22/14 × 5.6 × 5.6

➺ Area = 11/7 × 5.6 × 5.6

➺ Area = (11 × 5.6 × 5.6/7)

➺ Area = (61.6 × 5.6/7)

➺ Area = (61.6 × 5.6/7)

➺ Area = 344.96/7

➺ Area = 49.28 cm

★ Perimeter of Semicircle:-

➺ Perimeter = πr + 2r

➺ Perimeter = 22/7 × 5.6 + 2 × 5.6

➺ Perimeter =( 22× 5.6/7 ) + 2 × 5.6

➺ Perimeter =123.2/7 + 2 × 5.6

➺ Perimeter =123.2/7 + 11.2

➺ Perimeter =123.2 + 78.4 / 7

➺ Perimeter =201.6/7

➺ Perimeter =28.8 cm

★ Therefore:-

Step-by-step explanation:

the area of a circle is

pi×r²

and of a half-circle (= half of a circle)

pi×r²/2

the area here is therefore

pi×5.6²/2 = pi×31.36/2= 15.68pi = 49.26017281... cm²

the perimeter is the sum of half of the circle's circumference plus the diameter (2×radius).

the circumference of a circle is

2×pi×r

and half of that is

2×pi×r/2 = pi×r

in our case that is

pi×5.6 = 17.59291886... cm

the full perimeter is then

17.59291886... + 2×5.6 = 28.79291886... cm

After testing the claim, the required t-statistic value will come out to be approximately -2.235.

it is given that,

Population mean annual salary is μ=$30000

Sample size is n=17

Sample mean annual salary is ¯x=$22298

Sample standard deviation of the salaries is s=$14200

Level of significance is α=0.05

To test the assertion that the mean annual salary for the adult population of one town is $30000, one must determine the test statistic.

The issue is determining whether the adult population of one town makes a mean annual wage of $30,000 or not. It shows that $30000 is taken as the mean annual salary under the null hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis, however, contends that the mean annual salary is not $30000.

The alternative hypothesis and the null are thus:

H0:μ=$30000

H0:μ≠$30000

Regarding the question, it has a small sample size and there is no known population standard deviation.

Consequently, is the proper test statistic as t-statistic.

The test statistic is determined as: assuming the null hypothesis is correct.

[tex]t= \frac{¯x−μ}{\frac{s}{√n} } \\ = \frac{22298 - 30000}{ \frac{14200}{ \sqrt{17} \\} } \\ = \frac{ - 7702 \sqrt{17} }{14200} \\ = - 2.236349[/tex]

or we can take the nearest decimals and it'll be -2.236. Thus, the value of the required t-statistic is approximately -2.236.

To learn more about t-statistic: https://brainly.com/question/15110538

#SPJ4

Based on their unit rates, Aiden Company charges more per mile and fixed fee than Eva Company.

The unit rate is the ratio of one value compared to another.

The unit rate (also known as the slope or the constant rate of proportionality) is the quotient of two quantities.

Fixed pickup fee per ride = $3

Variable fee per mile = $1.20

Slope (unit rate) = Rise/Run = $1.40 ($18 - $11) / (10 - 5)

Variable fee per mile = $1.40 ($7 ÷ 5)

Fixed pickup fee per ride = $4 ($11 - $1.4(5)

Thus, while Eva charges a fixed cost of $3 for every ride and $1.20 per mile, Aiden charges a fixed cost of $4 for every ride and $1.40 per mile, thereby charging more overall.

Learn more about the unit rate at https://brainly.com/question/4895463.

#SPJ1

Which company charges more?

Answer:

Number of $ 8 priced tickets = 210

Number of $10 priced tickets = 140

Number of $ 12 priced tickets = 70

Step-by-step explanation:

Framing and solving equations with three variables:

Let the number of $ 8 priced tickets = x

Let the number of $10 priced tickets = y

Let the number of $ 12 priced tickets = z

  Total number of tickets = 420

                 x +  y + z = 420           --------------(i)

         Total income = $ 3920

        8x + 10y + 12z = 3920      ----------------(ii)

Combined number of $8 and $10 priced tickets= 5 * the number of $12 priced tickets

                      x + y  = 5z

                x + y - 5z = 0         -------------------(iii)

(i)        x + y + z = 420

(iii)      x + y - 5z = 0

       -     -     +      +   {Subtract (iii) from (i)}

                    6z = 420

                      z = 420÷ 6

                     [tex]\sf \boxed{\bf z = 70}[/tex]

(ii)            8x + 10y + 12z = 3920

(iii)*8       8x + 8y - 40z   = 0  

             -       -     +            -           {Now subtract}

                     2y  + 52z = 3920   -----------------(iv)

Substitute z = 70 in the above equation and we will get the value of 'y',

                 2y + 52*70 = 3920

                2y + 3640   = 3920

                               2y = 3920 - 3640

                               2y = 280

                                 y = 280 ÷ 2

                                 [tex]\sf \boxed{\bf y = 140}[/tex]

substitute z = 70 & y = 140 in equation (i) and we can get the value of 'x',

         x +  140 + 70 = 420

                  x + 210 = 420

                          x  = 420 - 210

                          [tex]\sf \boxed{x = 210}[/tex]

Number of $ 8 priced tickets = 210

Number of $10 priced tickets = 140

Number of $ 12 priced tickets = 70

The probability that more than 40% of 100 randomly selected physicians were sued is about 10%. Therefore, the answer is b. About 10%.

To determine the probability that more than 40% of 100 randomly selected physicians were sued, we need to find the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution and then use the z-score to find the probability.

1. Find the mean (µ) and standard deviation (σ) of the sampling distribution:
µ = p = 0.34 (the proportion of physicians sued for malpractice)
q = 1 - p = 0.66 (the proportion of physicians not sued for malpractice)
n = 100 (sample size)

[tex]Standard deviation (σ) = \sqrt{\frac{pq}{n} }  = \sqrt{\frac{(0.34)(0.66)}{100} } = 0.047[/tex]

2. Calculate the z-score for the desired proportion (40% or 0.40):
[tex]z = \frac{X-µ}{σ}  = \frac{0.40-0.34}{0.047} = 1.28[/tex]

3. Use a z-table or calculator to find the probability associated with the z-score:
P(Z > 1.28) =0.100 (rounded to three decimal places)

The probability that more than 40% of 100 randomly selected physicians were sued is about 10%. Therefore, the answer is b. About 10%.

To know more about "Probability" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

To find the z-value needed to calculate one-sided confidence bounds for an 81% confidence level, we first need to determine the area under the normal distribution curve to the left of the confidence level. Since we are looking for one-sided confidence bound, we only need to consider the area to the left of the mean.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the area to the left of the mean for an 81% confidence level is 0.905.

Next, we need to find the corresponding z-value for this area. We can use the inverse normal distribution function to do this.

z = invNorm(0.905)

Using a calculator or a table, we can find that the z-value for an area of 0.905 is approximately 1.37.

Therefore, the z-value needed to calculate one-sided confidence bounds for an 81% confidence level is 1.37 (rounded to two decimal places).
The z-value needed to calculate a one-sided confidence bound with an 81% confidence level.

1. First, since it's one-sided confidence bound, we need to find the area under the standard normal curve that corresponds to 81% confidence. This means the area to the left of the z-value will be 0.81.

2. Now, to find the z-value, we can use a z-table or an online calculator that provides the z-value corresponding to the cumulative probability. In this case, the cumulative probability is 0.81.

3. Using a z-table or an online calculator, we find that the z-value corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.81 is approximately 0.88.

So, the z-value needed to calculate a one-sided 81% confidence bound is 0.88, rounded to two decimal places.

Learn more about z-value here:- brainly.com/question/30172182.

#SPJ11

The balance and interest earned for each option are:

If you earn 1.7% interest annually, the balance in the account after 4 years would be:

Balance = $2500 × (1 + 0.017)^4 ≈ $2801.97

The interest earned would be the difference between the balance and the initial investment:

Interest = $2801.97 - $2500 = $301.97

If you earn 1.5% interest compounded monthly, we need to first calculate the monthly interest rate:

Monthly rate = 1.5% / 12 = 0.125%

The balance in the account after 4 years would be:

Balance = $2500 × (1 + 0.00125)^48 ≈ $2804.63

The interest earned would be the difference between the balance and the initial investment:

Interest = $2804.63 - $2500 = $304.63

If you earn 1.2% interest compounded daily, we need to first calculate the daily interest rate:

Daily rate = 1.2% / 365 = 0.003288%

The balance in the account after 4 years would be:

Balance = $2500 × (1 + 0.00003288)^1460 ≈ $2806.54

The interest earned would be the difference between the balance and the initial investment:

Interest = $2806.54 - $2500 = $306.54

If you earn 0.7% interest compounded continuously, we use the formula:

Balance = $2500 × e^(0.007 × 4) ≈ $2809.60

The interest earned would be the difference between the balance and the initial investment:

Interest = $2809.60 - $2500 = $309.60

Read more on interest here:https://brainly.com/question/25793394

#SPJ1

The exponential function that represents the graph is given as follow:

y = 2^(x - 1) + 2.

An exponential function has the definition presented as follows:

y = ab^x.

In which the parameters are given as follows:

The function in this problem has a horizontal asymptote at y = 2, hence:

y = ab^x + 2.

When x increases by one, y is multiplied by two, hence the parameters a and b can given as follows:

a = 1, b = 2.

The function is translated one unit right, hence it is defined as follows:

y = 2^(x - 1) + 2.

More can be learned about exponential functions at brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

The estimated total sales after 11 months is approximately 235.54 thousand video games. To find and in the given equation for total sales, The equation is: total sales = 89 + 45ln(number of months since release) We can see that the coefficient of the natural logarithm function is 45.

So, we have: 45 = k where k is the growth rate of the video game sales. Now, to estimate the total sales after 11 months, we need to substitute 11 for in the equation: total sales = 89 + 45ln(11) Using a calculator, we get: total sales ≈ 235.54 Rounding to the nearest hundredth, we get: total sales ≈ 235.54 thousand.

So, the estimated total sales after 11 months is approximately 235.54 thousand video games.

Know more about sales here:

https://brainly.com/question/29857652

#SPJ11