A client wants to determine whether there is a significant difference in the time required to complete a program evaluation with the three different methods that are in common use. Suppose the times (in hours) required for each of 18 evaluators to conduct a program evaluation follow.
Method 1 Method 2 Method 3
69 63 59
72 71 65
66 76 67
78 69 55
75 73 57
73 70 63
Use α = 0.05 and test to see whether there is a significant difference in the time required by the three methods.
State the null and alternative hypotheses.
H0: Median1 = Median2 = Median3
Ha: Median1 ≠ Median2 ≠ Median3
H0: Median1 ≠ Median2 ≠ Median3
Ha: Median1 = Median2 = Median3
H0: Not all populations of times are identical.
Ha: All populations of times are identical.
H0: All populations of times are identical.
Ha: Not all populations of times are identical.
H0: Median1 = Median2 = Median3
Ha: Median1 > Median2 > Median3
Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
p-value =
State your conclusion.
Do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the time required by the three methods.
Reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the time required by the three methods.
Do not reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the time required by the three methods.
Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the time required by the three methods.

The solutions are:

(a) 2Cu = (16C, 6C)

(b) 3v = (18, -21)

(c) V - u = (-2, -10)

(d) 2u + 5v = (46, -29)

To find the given values, we need to perform basic vector operations using the given vectors u and v.

(a) 2Cu

We need to multiply the vector u by 2C.

2Cu = 2C(8, 3)

= (16C, 6C)

So, 2Cu = (16C, 6C).

(b) 3v

We need to multiply the vector v by 3.

3v = 3(6, -7)

= (18, -21)

So, 3v = (18, -21).

(c) V - u

We need to subtract the vector u from the vector v.

V - u = (6, -7) - (8, 3)

= (-2, -10)

So, V - u = (-2, -10).

(d) 2u + 5v

We need to multiply vector u by 2 and vector v by 5 and then add the two vectors.

2u + 5v = 2(8, 3) + 5(6, -7)

= (16, 6) + (30, -35)

= (46, -29)

So, 2u + 5v = (46, -29).

Therefore, the solutions are:

(a) 2Cu = (16C, 6C)

(b) 3v = (18, -21)

(c) V - u = (-2, -10)

(d) 2u + 5v = (46, -29)

To learn more about operations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/199119

#SPJ11

Examples of Algebraic Multigrid Method (AMG) applied to linear systems include solving partial differential equations (PDEs) such as Poisson's equation and the Helmholtz equation, as well as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) problems.

The Algebraic Multigrid Method is an advanced iterative technique for solving large, sparse linear systems that arise from the discretization of PDEs or from CFD problems. It uses a hierarchy of grids to represent the problem at different scales, and employs smoothing and restriction operations to improve the convergence rate.

To know more about Poisson's equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30465210

#SPJ11

To answer the question about whether the process standard deviation of the cylindrical metal bar production should be adjusted to (I) a higher level than 0.25 cm or (II) a lower level than 0.25 cm to minimize the chance of production costs exceeding $1000, the suggestion is to adjust the standard deviation to (II) a lower level than 0.25 cm.

By reducing the standard deviation, the variation in the lengths of the produced metal bars will decrease, resulting in more consistent and controlled production. This will ultimately help minimize the chances of the production cost of a metal bar exceeding the $1000 threshold. A lower standard deviation ensures that the production process has fewer outliers and deviations from the mean length of 11 cm, leading to cost efficiency and reduction of waste or rework due to bars not meeting the desired specifications.

To know more about standard deviation - https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

Answer:

No, it is not. See justification in the diagram.

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to do polynomial long division. My math is shown in the picture below and if you have any questions, please let me know.

At the end, (x+7) does not go into 468.

Answer:

A. The probability of a temperature from 30 degrees to 90 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

The range of the graph is from 60 to 160 degrees, so we're looking for options that fit within that range.

A. 30 degrees is lower than 60, outside the range

B. Fits

C. Need more information

D. 30 degrees is too low, outside the range

(a) The probability of selecting a senior on any given selection is 0.65. The probability of selecting a non-senior (either a junior or a sophomore) is 0.35. To select exactly three award-winners until a senior is selected, we need to select two non-seniors followed by a senior. The probability of this sequence is:

0.35 * 0.35 * 0.65 = 0.080

So the probability of selecting exactly three award-winners until a senior is selected is 0.080.

(b) The probability of selecting a junior on any given selection is 0.24. The probability of selecting a non-junior (either a senior or a sophomore) is 0.76. To select at least three award-winners until a junior is selected, we need to select two or more non-juniors followed by a junior. The probability of this sequence is:

(0.76 * 0.76 * 0.24) + (0.76 * 0.24) + (0.24) = 0.334

So the probability of selecting at least three award-winners until a junior is selected is 0.334.

(c) The probability of selecting a sophomore on any given selection is 0.11. The probability of selecting a non-sophomore (either a senior or a junior) is 0.89. To select 2 or fewer award-winners until a sophomore is selected, we need to select 1 or 2 non-sophomores followed by a sophomore. The probability of these sequences is:

(0.89 * 0.89 * 0.11) + (0.89 * 0.11) + (0.11) = 0.214

So the probability of selecting 2 or fewer award-winners, until a sophomore is selected, is 0.214.
(a) To find the probability that we will select exactly three award-winners, and the third one is a SENIOR, we need to consider the following probabilities:

1. First student is not a senior (i.e., a junior or a sophomore)
2. Second student is not a senior (i.e., a junior or a sophomore)
3. Third student is a senior

Probability (not a senior) = 1 - Probability (senior) = 1 - 0.65 = 0.35
Probability (exactly 3 award-winners with the third being a senior) = 0.35 * 0.35 * 0.65 ≈ 0.079625

(b) To find the probability that we will select at least three award-winners until a JUNIOR is selected, we can find the probability of selecting 1 or 2 award-winners and subtract it from 1.

Probability (1 award-winner and it's a junior) = 0.24
Probability (2 award-winners, first is not a junior and second is a junior) = (1-0.24) * 0.24 = 0.1816

Total probability (1 or 2 award-winners) = 0.24 + 0.1816 = 0.4216
Probability (at least 3 award-winners) = 1 - 0.4216 ≈ 0.5784

(c) To find the probability that we will select 2 or fewer award-winners until a SOPHOMORE is selected:

Probability (1 award-winner and it's a sophomore) = 0.11
Probability (2 award-winners, first is not a sophomore and second is a sophomore) = (1-0.11) * 0.11 ≈ 0.0989

Total probability (2 or fewer award-winners) = 0.11 + 0.0989 ≈ 0.2089

Learn more about probability here:- brainly.com/question/30034780.

#SPJ11

Writing the total surface area of North America, which is approximately 9,540,000 square miles in Scientific Notation, is 9.54 x 10^6.

Scientific notation is shorthand way of writing very large or very small numbers in a standard form.

A number is written in scientific notation when a number between 1 and 10 is multiplied by a power of 10.

For instance, 9,540,000 square miles can be written in scientific notation as 9.54 x 10^6 square miles.

Thus, we can state that, in scientific notation, 9,540,000 square miles equal 9.54 x 10^6 square miles.

Learn more about scientific notations at brainly.com/answer expert verified.

#SPJ1

The three consecutive odd integers are 27, 29, and 31.

Given that three consecutive odd integers their sum is two times third number plus 25

Let's call the first odd integer "x." Since the integers are consecutive odd numbers, therefore, the next two odd integers would be x+2 and x+4.

Now according to the problem, their sum is equal to two times the third number (x+4) plus 25:

x + (x+2) + (x+4) = 2(x+4) + 25

Simplifying the left side:

3x + 6 = 2x + 8 + 25

Next combining like terms:

3x + 6 = 2x + 33

Subtracting 2x and 6 from both sides:

x = 27

Therefore, the three consecutive odd integers are 27, 29, and 31.

Know more about integers here:

https://brainly.com/question/929808

#SPJ11

a) The total number of capsules needed for 4 weeks is C, 112 capsules.

b) The total milliliters needed for the month of October is C, 465 ml.

a) To determine the number of Rimactane 150mg capsules needed for a 10-year-old boy weighing 30 kg, who has been prescribed a dose of 10 mg/kg twice daily for 4 weeks, follow these steps:

1. Calculate the total daily dose: 30 kg * 10 mg/kg = 300 mg/day
2. Determine the number of daily doses: 300 mg/day / 150 mg/capsule = 2 capsules/day
3. Calculate the total number of capsules needed for 4 weeks: 2 capsules/day * 7 days/week * 4 weeks = 112 capsules

The answer is C, 112 capsules.

b) To calculate the number of milliliters of Epanutin suspension (phenytoin 30 mg/5 ml) that a 5-year-old boy weighing 18 kg with epilepsy will take at a dose of 5 mg/kg twice daily during the month of October, follow these steps:

1. Calculate the total daily dose: 18 kg * 5 mg/kg = 90 mg/day
2. Determine the number of milliliters needed for each daily dose: 90 mg/day * (5 ml/30 mg) = 15 ml/day
3. Calculate the total milliliters needed for the month of October: 15 ml/day * 31 days = 465 ml

The answer is C, 465 ml.

Learn more about "number": https://brainly.com/question/24644930

#SPJ11

The gradient of the path from the trailhead to the mountain peak can be calculated by dividing the change in elevation (in feet) by the length of the trail (in miles). i.e., Gradient = (Change in Elevation) / (Trail Length)

To calculate the elevation change, we can subtract the elevation at the trailhead from the elevation at the mountain peak:

Change in Elevation = Peak Elevation - Trailhead Elevation
Change in Elevation = 9,262 ft - 3,874 ft
Change in Elevation = 5,388 ft

To calculate the length of the trail in miles, we simply divide the length in feet by the number of feet in a mile:

Trail Length = 3 miles

Now we can calculate the gradient:

Gradient = (Change in Elevation) / (Trail Length)
Gradient = 5,388 ft / 3 miles
Gradient = 1,796 ft/mi

Therefore, the gradient of the path from the trailhead to the mountain peak is 1,796 ft/mi. This means that for every mile traveled along the path, there is an increase in elevation of 1,796 feet. The steepness of this path may pose a challenge to hikers, especially those who are not accustomed to hiking at high elevations. Hikers need to be prepared and take appropriate safety precautions when hiking in mountainous terrain.

To learn more about Gradient, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28016665

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we need to understand the conditions under which the inequality $x^2 nx 15 < 0$ has no real solutions. This inequality can be rewritten as $nx(x-15/n) < 0$, which tells us that either $n>0$ and $x<0$ or $x>15/n$, or $n<0$ and $x>0$ or $x<15/n$.

In either case, we have a product of two factors that must be negative, which means that either both factors are negative or both factors are positive.
Since we are looking for the number of different possible values of $n$, we need to consider all possible combinations of signs for $n$ and $x-15/n$. If $n>0$, then $x-15/n$ must also be positive, which means that $x>15/n$. If $n<0$, then $x-15/n$ must be negative, which means that $x<15/n$. In either case, we can see that $n$ must be either positive or negative, and that there is only one possible value of $n$ that satisfies the given condition: $n = \frac{15}{x^2}$.

To find the number of different possible values of $n$, we need to consider all possible values of $x$. If $x=0$, then the inequality is trivially true for any value of $n$. If $x\neq 0$, then we can see that $n$ can take any value in the interval $(0,\infty)$ or $(-\infty,0)$, which means that there are infinitely many possible values of $n$ that satisfy the given condition.

Therefore, the answer to the question is that there are infinitely many different possible values of $n$.
To find the number of different possible values of $n$ for which the inequality $x^2 + nx + 15 < 0$ has no real solutions in $x$, we first need to analyze the inequality.

Step 1: Find the discriminant of the quadratic inequality.
The discriminant, $D$, is given by the formula $D = b^2 - 4ac$, where $a$, $b$, and $c$ are the coefficients of the quadratic expression. In this case, $a = 1$, $b = n$, and $c = 15$.

So, $D = n^2 - 4(1)(15) = n^2 - 60$.

Step 2: Determine the condition for the inequality to have no real solutions.
For a quadratic inequality to have no real solutions, the parabola must not intersect the x-axis, which means the discriminant must be less than 0.

So, we need to solve the inequality $D < 0$:

$n^2 - 60 < 0$

Step 3: Solve the inequality for $n$.
To solve the inequality, find the range of values of $n$ that satisfy the inequality.

$(n - \sqrt{60})(n + \sqrt{60}) < 0$

Since $\sqrt{60}$ is between 7 and 8, we can rewrite the inequality as:

$-8 < n < 8$

Step 4: Count the number of possible integer values of $n$.
The inequality indicates that $n$ must be an integer between -8 and 8 (not inclusive). Therefore, the possible values of $n$ are -7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.

There are 14 different possible values of $n$ for which the inequality $x^2 + nx + 15 < 0$ has no real solutions in $x$.

Learn more about coefficients at : brainly.com/question/22241464

#SPJ11

(a)This is because the distance between the slits is such that the waves from S1 and S2 arrive at Y in phase, resulting in constructive interference and a maximum in intensity. (b) The frequency of microwaves is [tex]1.94x10^8 Hz[/tex]. (c)One reason why the maxima observed at W, X, and Y will have different intensities from each other is due to the phenomenon of diffraction.

(a) The pattern of intensity maxima and minima observed in the double-slit experiment can be explained by the principle of interference. The microwaves from S1 and S2 interfere with each other as they propagate through the slits and form a pattern on the screen where they are detected. When the receiver is initially placed at W, it is equidistant from both slits and therefore the path lengths for the waves from each slit are equal, resulting in constructive interference and a maximum in intensity.

As the receiver is moved towards Z, the path length from S1 to the receiver decreases while the path length from S2 to the receiver increases. At X, the path lengths from S1 and S2 differ by one wavelength, resulting in constructive interference and a maximum in intensity. At Y, the path lengths from S1 and S2 differ by half a wavelength, resulting in destructive interference and a minimum in intensity.

The distance from S1 to Y is 1.243m, which is equal to the wavelength of the microwaves, while the distance from S2 to Y is 1.181m, which is also equal to the wavelength of the microwaves. This is because the distance between the slits is such that the waves from S1 and S2 arrive at Y in phase, resulting in constructive interference and a maximum in intensity.

(b) The frequency of the microwaves can be determined using the equation for the wavelength of a wave, which is given by[tex]λ = c/f[/tex], where[tex]λ[/tex]is the wavelength, c is the speed of light, and f is the frequency. We know that the wavelength of the microwaves is 1.243m, so we can rearrange the equation to solve for the frequency: f =[tex]c/λ[/tex] = 2.41 ×[tex]10^8[/tex]m/s ÷ 1.243m =[tex]1.94x10^8 Hz[/tex].

(c) As the waves pass through the narrow slits, they spread out and interfere with each other, creating a diffraction pattern. The intensity of the pattern is determined by the amount of interference, which depends on the size of the slits and the wavelength of the waves.

The intensity of the maxima will be affected by the width of the slits, with narrower slits producing a more intense diffraction pattern. The intensity will also be affected by the distance from the slits to the screen, with further distances producing a less intense diffraction pattern. Therefore, the maxima observed at different points on the screen will have different intensities due to variations in the diffraction pattern.

Learn more about frequency here:

https://brainly.com/question/29739263

#SPJ4

Answer:

18.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Make sure the numbers are in order from least to greatest!

To define the median of the lower half, you must first divide the data set in half. Then, find the median of the first half.

17, 18, 19, 20 | 21, 24, 25, 27

To find the median, locate the number(s) in the middle of the data set.

17, 18, 19, 20

There are two numbers in the middle: 18 and 19.

When you have two medians, add the numbers, then divide the sum by 2.

[tex]18+19=37\\37/2=18.5[/tex]

The median of the lower half is 18.5.

The critical value for the goodness-of-fit needed to test the claim is A.11.071

Given:

There are 6 colors.

Df= 6-1=5

Critical chi-square with 5 df at 0.05 level of significance = 11.071

Answer: 11.071

Chi-square serves as a statistical examination that analyzes whether there exists any noteworthy disparity between anticipated and witnessed frequencies present inside a categorical compilation of data.

By assessing the interrelationship between two independent variables, the tool determines the scope of association between them till they become independent.

After scrutinizing the differentiation within the outcome extracted from expected and actual observations, which is then evaluated against predetermined chi-square results, the derived p-value deduces the consequent decision concerning null hypothesis dismissal or affirmation in confirming an absence of interrelation between the two initial variable candidates.

Read more about chi-square here:

https://brainly.com/question/4543358

#SPJ1

Answer:

Let xxx be the number of days Addison can afford to rent.

The cost of renting the car for xxx days is 20*x.

The cost of driving 100 miles is 0.10*100 = 10.

The total cost of renting the car and driving is 20*x + 10.

Addison wants to spend at most $80, so we have the inequality 20*x + 10 <= 80.

Solving for xxx, we get x <= 3.

Therefore, Addison can afford to rent the car for at most 3 days.

Yes, $9 for 4 visitors and $18 for 8 site visitors are proportional.

To determine whether or not $9 for 4 visitors and $18 for 8 visitors are proportional, we need to test if the ratio of the value to the number of visitors is the equal for both cases.

The ratio of cost to the quantity of visitors for $9 and four visitors is:

$9/4 visitors = $2.25/ visitors

The ratio of value to the quantity of visitors for $18 and eight visitors is:

$18/8 visitors = $2.25/ visitors

We are able to see that both ratios are equal to $2.25 per visitor.

Therefore, $9 for 4 visitors and $18 for 8 site visitors are proportional.

Learn more about proportional:-

https://brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPJ4

Answer:

Let B {bı, b2} and C = {c1, c2} be bases for R^2 where bı [-1;8]. b2 [1;-5], c1 = [1;4]. Find the change-of-coordinates matrix from B to C and the change-of-coordinates matrix from C to B.

In the given problem, we have the bases B and C as follows:

B = {b1, b2} where b1 = [-1;8] and b2 = [1;-5]

C = {c1, c2} where c1 = [1;4] and c2 = [0;1]

We need to find the change-of-coordinates matrix from B to C and from C to B.

To find the change-of-coordinates matrix from B to C, we need to express the basis vectors of B in terms of the basis vectors of C. We can do this by solving the following equations:

b1 = x1c1 + y1c2

b2 = x2c1 + y2c2

where x1 , y1, x2, and y2 are the coefficients we want to find.

Substituting the given values, we get:

[-1;8] = x1*[1;4] + y1*[0;1]

[1;-5] = x2*[1;4] + y2*[0;1]

Solving these equations, we get:

x1 = -17/4, y1 = 1/4, x2 = 9/4, and y2 = -1/4

Therefore, the change-of-coordinates matrix from B to C is:

[-17/4  9/4]

[ 1/4 -1/4]

To find the change-of-coordinates matrix from C to B, we need to express the basis vectors of C in terms of the basis vectors of B. We can do this by solving the following equations:

c1 = a1b1 + a2b2

c2 = b1b1 + b2b2

where a1 , a2, b1, and b2 are the coefficients we want to find.

Substituting the given values and solving these equations, we get:

a1 = 4/17, a2 = -1/17, b1 = -1/17, and b2 = -5/17

Therefore, the change-of-coordinates matrix from C to B is:

[ 4/17 -1/17]

[-1/17 -5/17]

I hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

first, we convert the minutes into an hour

there are 60 minutes in an hour

so then we do 60 divided by 12

that equals to 5

so 5 miles is the answer

The inequalities are x ≤ -2 and x <-5.

We have,

x is less than or equal to -2 and x is less than -5.

writing the inequality in mathematical expression as

x is less than or equal to -2  = x ≤ -2.

and, x is less than -5 = x <-5.

Now, for x ≤ -2  the number line start from -2 with closed dot and move towards -3, -4, -5, ....

and, for x < -5 the number line start from -5 with open dot move towards -6, -7, -8, ....

Learn more about Inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ1

The perimeter of the square is greater than its area.

We have,

The area of a square is given by the formula A = s²,

where s is the length of one side of the square.

The perimeter is given by the formula P = 4s,

where s is the length of one side of the square.

In our case,

The length of one side of the square is 10 units.

So,

Area = s² = 10² = 100 square units

Perimeter = 4s = 4(10) = 40 units

We can see that the perimeter of the square (40 units) is greater than the area of the square (100 square units).

This makes sense because the perimeter is measuring the total distance around the square, while the area is measuring the amount of space inside the square.

To explain why the perimeter is greater than the area, we can imagine that we are trying to measure the perimeter of the square by walking around its edge, while we are trying to measure the area of the square by filling it with small square tiles.

We can see that we would need more tiles to fill the space inside the square than we would need to walk around its edge, which explains why the area is smaller than the perimeter.

Therefore,

The perimeter of the square is greater than its area.

Learn more about squares here:

https://brainly.com/question/22964077

#SPJ1

The values of x and y in the attached triangle using trigonometric ratios are: x = 59 and y = 51.1

The three primary trigonometric ratios are:

sin x = opposite/hypotenuse

cos x = adjacent/hypotenuse

tan x = opposite/adjacent

Now, to find the values of x and y in the attached triangle using trigonometric ratios, we have:

29.5/y = tan 30

y = 29.5/tan 30

y = 51.1

Similarly:

29.5/x = sin 30

29.5/0.5 = x

x = 59

Read more about Trigonometric ratios at: https://brainly.com/question/13276558

#SPJ1

The delivery person will need 6 gallons of gasoline in his tank for a 9-hour shift.

To find the gallons of gasoline needed for a 9-hour shift, we will use the given functions f(x) and g(y).

Find the number of miles driven in 9 hours using the function f(x) = x^2 + 3x.
f(9) = 9^2 + 3(9) = 81 + 27 = 108 miles

Calculate the gallons of gasoline used for driving 108 miles using the function g(y) = y/18.
g(108) = 108/18 = 6 gallons

So, the delivery person will need 6 gallons of gasoline in his tank for a 9-hour shift.

Learn more about "function": https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ11

To find the number of integers x such that x^2 < 10x – 21, follow these steps:

1. Rearrange the inequality to have all terms on one side:
x^2 - 10x + 21 < 0

2. Factor the quadratic expression:
(x - 7)(x - 3) < 0

3. Determine the critical points by finding the zeros of the factors:
x - 7 = 0 => x = 7
x - 3 = 0 => x = 3

4. Create intervals based on the critical points:
(-∞, 3), (3, 7), and (7, ∞)

5. Test a number from each interval in the inequality (x - 7)(x - 3) < 0:

- Interval (-∞, 3): Choose x = 2, (2 - 7)(2 - 3) = 5 * -1 < 0, interval is valid
- Interval (3, 7): Choose x = 4, (4 - 7)(4 - 3) = -3 * 1 > 0, interval is not valid
- Interval (7, ∞): Choose x = 8, (8 - 7)(8 - 3) = 1 * 5 > 0, interval is not valid

6. Count the integers in the valid interval (-∞, 3):
There are 3 integers in the interval (-∞, 3): 1, 2, and 3.

Therefore, there are 3 integers x such that x^2 < 10x - 21.

https://brainly.com/question/30181555

#SPJ11

Answer: 7:8

Step-by-step explanation: just subtract 150-80 and you get 70

80 is the women

The remaining 70 is the men

Now arrange it to men:women

70:80

Now simplify

7:8

Hope that helps :)

The probability that at most 2 columns will fail is 0.98.

This is a binomial distribution problem, where the number of trials n = 16, the probability of success (a column failing) p = 0.05, and we want to find the probability of at most 2 columns failing.

To solve this, we need to calculate the probability of 0, 1, or 2 columns failing and add them up.

P(at most 2 columns failing) = P(0 columns failing) + P(1 column failing) + P(2 columns failing)

P(0 columns failing) = (n choose 0) * p^0 * (1-p)^(n-0) = (16 choose 0) * 0.05^0 * 0.95^16 = 0.45

P(1 column failing) = (n choose 1) * p^1 * (1-p)^(n-1) = (16 choose 1) * 0.05^1 * 0.95^15 = 0.38

P(2 columns failing) = (n choose 2) * p^2 * (1-p)^(n-2) = (16 choose 2) * 0.05^2 * 0.95^14 = 0.15

P(at most 2 columns failing) = 0.45 + 0.38 + 0.15 = 0.98

Therefore, the probability that at most 2 columns will fail is 0.98.

To learn more about failing visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17043986

#SPJ11

Answer:

-12

Step-by-step explanation:

First substitute

Then after evaluating collect the like terms

After collecting the like terns simplify the Numbers

And finally evaluate the answer

Answer: 2x-64x+18x = –44x

Step-by-step explanation:

The event that will have a sample space of S = {h, t} is (a) Flipping a fair, two-sided coin

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Sample space of S = {h, t}

The sample size of the above is

Size = 2

Analyzing the options, we have

Hence, the event is (a)

Read more about events at

https://brainly.com/question/7965468

#SPJ1

The experimental probability that the next shirt sold will be purple is [tex]2/5[/tex].

The experimental probability means ratio of the number of times the event occurs to the total number of trials or observations.

In this case, the event is the sale of a purple shirt and the trials are the total number of shirts sold.

So, total number of shirts sold is:

= 6 purple shirts + 9 other color shirts

= 15 shirts

The number of purple shirts sold is 6.

The experimental probability of selling a purple shirt on the next sale will be:

= Number of purple shirts sold / Total number of shirts sold

= 6 / 15

= 2 / 5.

Read more about experimental probability

brainly.com/question/8652467

#SPJ1

Daniel's balance before he wrote the check on Friday was $248.

To solve this problem, we can start by subtracting the $60 deposit from the $158 check, which gives us a balance of $98 before the check was cashed.

Since the account was overdrawn by $8 on Wednesday, we can subtract $8 from the balance to get $90.

Finally, we must add back the $158 check that was cashed which will give a balance of:

= $158 + $90

= $248

Read more about balance

brainly.com/question/1403056

#SPJ1