7. CONTRASTING
Underline evidence in the text
of that shows how Thucydides'
study of history differed from
Herodotus'. Which historian's
view more closely reflected the
culture of the time and why?

Explanation:

A dolphin is not a fish but is a mammal. Dolphins share many similarities with fish, including living in water and having streamlined bodies that help them swim efficiently. However, dolphins are warm-blooded and breathe air through lungs, unlike fish which are cold-blooded and breathe through gills. Additionally, dolphins nurse their young with milk and have hair on their bodies, which are both characteristics of mammals. Therefore, even though dolphins may appear similar to fish, they are a distinct type of animal with unique characteristics and traits that classify them as mammals rather than fish.

Option A, los revolutionnaires, is the correct answer.

A revolutionary is someone who advocates for radical change without fear. Revolutionary individuals and ideas challenge the status quo and may be violent or willing to disrupt the natural order in order to achieve their objectives. It's all about turning things around, just like the word revolve. revolutionists. A revolutionist is someone who works for political or social change, whether they are overthrowing a government or protesting an unjust law. tending to or promoting revolution.

constituting or bringing about a major or fundamental change. A revolutionary is someone who participates in or advocates for a revolution. The term revolutionary can also be used as an adjective to describe something that has a significant, unexpected impact on society or some aspect of human endeavour.

To know more about revolution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10287362

#SPJ1

West Virginia - When the state of Virginia left the Union, West Virginia broke away and became its own state.

Which state did fighting South and Union supporters set up their own state government?

Six more states—Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas—separated after South Carolina, and four more—Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina—threatened to do the same. The Confederate States of America eventually emerged from these eleven states.

South Carolina announced its secession from the United States of America on December 20, 1860. Ten more southern states would leave the Union in the following six months: 9 January 1861 in Mississippi. 10 January 1861, Florida. Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia were all members of the Confederacy. The Confederate Congress gave the go-ahead to recruit 400,000 recruits on May 16. On May 20, 1861, North Carolina became the final state to ratify the treaty.

Learn more about government:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ1

simplified Answer: Tennessee

Answer:

Explanation:

Containment of communism: At the time, the US was engaged in the Cold War with the Soviet Union, and there was a fear that the spread of communism would destabilize other countries and regions. The US viewed Vietnam as a critical battleground in the fight against communism and saw supporting France as a way to contain the spread of communism in Southeast Asia.

Economic interests: The US had economic interests in the region, including access to raw materials and markets for American goods. Supporting France in the conflict was a way to maintain these economic interests.

Alliance with France: The US had a long-standing alliance with France, which dates back to the American Revolution. Supporting France in the conflict was a way to strengthen this alliance.

Ideological reasons: Many US policymakers believed that the Vietnamese would be better off under French colonial rule than

communist rule. This belief was based on a view of communism as a totalitarian ideology that would lead to oppression and the suppression of individual freedoms.

Answer:

Saddam Hussein Mesopotamian Arabic 28 April 1937 – 30 December 2006), known as Saddam, was an Iraqi politician who served as the fifth president of Iraq from 16 July 1979 until 9 April 2003.

Explanation:

American forces had established a beachhead on the island six days after the Japanese forces first invaded Iwo Jima on February 19, 1945, but the fighting continued fiercely.

The Japanese defended the island fiercely from a complex network of caves and tunnels, slowing and challenging American advance. The island was heavily fortified. In the days and weeks following the initial invasion, soldiers who had returned to Iwo Jima would have encountered a landscape in ruins, with the island dotted with bomb craters and littered with the remains of fierce battles. As both American and Japanese soldiers lay dead or dying on the island, the smell of decay and death would have pervaded the area. Despite the challenging circumstances, American forces persisted in their efforts, and after a month of fierce combat, they succeeded in securing the island. The conflict resulted in more than 6,800 American and 18,000 Japanese soldiers dying, making it one of the bloodiest in the Pacific campaign of World War II.

To Know more about American forces Visit:

brainly.com/question/1799621

#SPJ1

Answer:

the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle acknowledges that states have a responsibility to protect their populations from mass atrocities, such as genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. It also recognizes that when states fail to fulfill this responsibility, the international community has a responsibility to intervene to protect the affected populations.

Regarding the question of whether R2P should override sovereignty, it is a controversial issue. On the one hand, some argue that sovereignty should be respected as a fundamental principle of international law, and that any intervention in a country's affairs without its consent is a violation of its sovereignty. On the other hand, others argue that sovereignty should not be an absolute principle, and that the international community has a responsibility to act when states commit atrocities against their own people.

There have been several instances where the R2P principle has been invoked, including in Kosovo in 1999, Libya in 2011, and Syria in 2013. In Kosovo, NATO intervened without UN Security Council authorization, leading to a debate about the legitimacy of the intervention. In Libya, the UN Security Council authorized a military intervention to protect civilians, leading to the ousting of the Gaddafi regime. In Syria, the international community has been criticized for its failure to take more robust action to protect civilians during the ongoing conflict.

In conclusion, the implementation of the R2P principle is a complex issue, and whether it should override sovereignty is a matter of debate. While there have been instances where R2P has been invoked, its application remains controversial, and the international community continues to grapple with how best to respond to mass atrocities.

Explanation:

The Auschwitz camp system, which consisted of three camps and a death center, was situated in German-occupied Poland. Find out about Auschwitz's past.

Auschwitz The first and most notorious of the six concentration and extermination camps set up by Nazi Germany to carry out its Final Solution strategy, which aimed to slaughter as many Jews as possible throughout Europe, was Birkenau.

A stirring book detailing the early years of the Holocaust and Tova Friedman's survival of numerous near-death encounters in a Jewish ghetto, a Nazi labor camp, and Auschwitz, written by one of the youngest survivors of Auschwitz.

To know more about Auschwitz visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30981454

#SPJ1

The Child Abuse Treatment and Prevention Act (CAPTA) of 1974 is the key piece of law protecting kids and families to date.

Supporting parents, imparting good parenting techniques, and strengthening the legislation to outlaw corporal punishment are all examples of effective preventative strategies. Continuous support for kids and families can lessen the likelihood that abuse will happen again and also lessen its effects.

12 to 20 years of prison with a penalty between Rigorous imprisonment to P500,000 for just a person who'd maintain in his society a youngster below 12 years old, but is ten years more than his senior in any private or public location - provided the culprit is not connected to the kid inside the 4th degree or consanguinity.

To know more about Child Abuse Prevention visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28500534

#SPJ1

Answer:

Berkeley's argument against abstract ideas is based on his belief that all knowledge comes through sensory experience. He argues that since abstract ideas do not have any corresponding sensory experience, they cannot be real. In other words, according to Berkeley, we can only know what we perceive through our senses, and anything that is not directly perceived does not exist.

Berkeley believes that abstract ideas are merely mental constructions that we create by combining and abstracting from our sensory experiences. He argues that concepts such as "redness" or "justice" are not real things that exist independently in the world, but rather they are mental abstractions that we create by combining and abstracting from our sensory experiences of particular instances of red objects or just actions.

This argument has important implications for the primary/secondary distinction that Locke made. According to Locke, primary qualities such as size, shape, and motion are objective qualities that exist independently in the external world and are perceived directly by our senses. In contrast, secondary qualities such as color, taste, and smell are subjective qualities that exist only in the mind and are caused by the interaction between primary qualities and our sensory organs.

However, Berkeley's argument against abstract ideas undermines the primary/secondary distinction because it denies the existence of objective qualities that can be perceived independently of our sensory experiences. For Berkeley, all qualities are subjective and exist only in the mind as mental constructions created by our sensory experiences. Therefore, there is no objective reality that exists independently of our perceptions.

Explanation:

D. Called attention to unsanitary conditions in the meat industry.

His Upton Sinclair novel The Jungle, published in 1906, revealed the appallingly unsanitary conditions of the meat processing industry.

The novel details how meat is often contaminated with rat droppings, sawdust, and other unsanitary substances, and how workers are forced to work in dangerous conditions. The book caused a public outcry and led to the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 and the Meat Inspection Act. The Pure Food and Drug Act is the first federal law regulating food and drugs in the United States. It urged food and drug manufacturers to label their products accurately and truthfully, and prohibited the sale of mislabeled or adulterated food and drug products. The Meat Inspection Act of 1906 required the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to inspect all meat sold across state lines to ensure it was safe for human consumption. In short, Upton Sinclair's The Jungle contributed directly to the passage of the reforms of 1906, exposing the unsanitary conditions of the meat processing industry and ensuring food and drug safety and regulation of the meat processing industry. led to the passage of two major laws aimed at.  

For more  information on adulterated see:

https://brainly.com/question/28615248

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. born in the United States

Explanation:

including CORPORATIONS !!! by the Supreme Court

giving CORPORATIONS many of the same rights as people

CORPORATIONS could now

1. spend money on political campaigns

2. lobby lawmakers like people

3. do a lawsuit

4. be sued

5. enter into contracts

6. protect itself against unfair government actions

chatgpt

historycom

Explanation:

He argued that the solution was to seek normalcy by restoring life to how it was before the war. Harding's conception of normalcy for the 1920s included deregulation, civic engagement, and isolationism.

The conflict between the Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire had various reasons, including territorial disputes, religious differences, and competition for economic and political power in the region.

The Ottoman Empire was a state founded by Turkish tribes in the late 13th century in Anatolia, which later expanded to become a major world power, controlling much of southeastern Europe, western Asia, and North Africa. The empire lasted from 1299 until its dissolution in 1922 following World War I. It was known for its military prowess, its Islamic heritage, and its system of government that allowed for a degree of autonomy for various ethnic and religious groups. The Ottoman Empire was also known for its architectural and artistic achievements, including the construction of iconic buildings such as the Blue Mosque and the Topkapi Palace in Istanbul.

To learn more about Ottoman Empire, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7067549

#SPJ1

The state legislature limited people who paid taxes and were white men's suffrage (voting privileges) in 1807. The Democratic-Republican Party did this to gain an advantage in the 1808 presidential election.

To learn more about presidential election, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/1443898

Cutting off commerce with the Umay-yad Empire would be the best course of action for the ruler of a post-classical North African country to take in order to accomplish this goal.

It was the first significant Mu-slim dynasty, ruling from 661 to 750. This dynasty was founded by Muwi-yah I, who overcame the Prop-het's son-in-law Al to become the fifth caliph. With the help of the Sy-rian army, he expanded the borders of the Arab empire.

After Prophet's passing, four important dynasties were established. The greatest way to achieve the goal of never converting to Is-lam is to quit doing business with the second major Empire.

By relocating the capital to Baghdad in 762 CE, the Abbasids assisted the mawali, or non-Arab Mu-slims, in overthrowing the Uma-yyad dynasty in 750 CE. The Abbasids created the professions of vizier and emir to represent their central government, progressively replacing the traditional Arab aristocracy with the Persian bureaucracy.

Learn more about Umay-yad Empire: https://brainly.com/question/21077978

#SPJ9

Answer:

Boston

Explanation:

Answer:

Sacramento

Explanation:

The region of New England consists of six states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Boston is the state capital of Massachusetts, and Providence is the state capital of Rhode Island. Based on this, we can deduct that Sacramento is not a capital found in New England. (P.S. Sacramento is the capital of California.)

Answer:

The powers of the Executive Branch have significantly expanded since the writing of the Constitution. In the early days of the United States, the President's powers were limited to executing the laws passed by Congress and serving as the Commander-in-Chief of the military. However, over time, the Executive Branch's role and powers have grown to include implementing and enforcing regulations, managing the nation's foreign affairs, and having a significant role in the budgeting process.

The Federalists, who supported a strong centralized government, favored a powerful Executive Branch. They believed that a strong Executive was necessary to ensure that the laws passed by Congress were implemented effectively and to maintain order and stability in the country. They argued that the President needed to be able to act quickly and decisively in times of crisis, without being tied down by the constraints of the legislative branch.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, who were wary of centralized power and favored stronger state governments, were skeptical of a powerful Executive Branch. They feared that a strong President could become tyrannical and usurp the powers of the other branches of government, leading to a loss of individual liberties.

In modern times, the powers of the Executive Branch have continued to expand. Some argue that this expansion has been necessary to address the increasingly complex and interconnected issues facing the country, while others argue that it has led to an imbalance of power that threatens individual rights and liberties.

The Federalists would likely argue that the expansion of Executive power has been necessary to address the challenges of modern governance. They might point to the Supreme Court case of United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936), in which the Court upheld the President's power to take executive action in matters of foreign policy. They might also cite the War Powers Resolution (1973), which provides a framework for the President to use military force, as an example of the necessary expansion of Executive power.

The Anti-Federalists, however, would likely argue that the expansion of Executive power has led to a dangerous concentration of power in the hands of the President. They might point to the recent use of executive orders to bypass Congress and implement policies unilaterally as an example of this concentration of power. They might also cite the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and argue that the government's surveillance programs, which have been implemented by the Executive Branch, violate this protection.

Overall, the debate over the modern-day Executive Branch is a complex one, and there are valid arguments to be made from both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives. However, it is clear that the role and powers of the Executive Branch have evolved significantly since the writing of the Constitution, and this evolution will likely continue as the country faces new and increasingly complex challenges.

Explanation:

Answer: The powers of the Executive Branch have significantly expanded since the writing of the Constitution. At the time of the Constitution's drafting, the role of the president was limited to primarily enforcing laws passed by Congress and serving as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The Federalists believed in a strong executive branch, arguing that a single, powerful executive would ensure stability and provide protection against foreign threats. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential for tyranny, and advocated for a weaker executive branch with more limited powers.

Over time, the Executive Branch has gained significant powers, particularly in the areas of foreign policy, national security, and economic regulation. For example, since World War II, the president has become the de facto leader of American foreign policy, with the ability to enter into treaties and engage in military conflicts without Congressional approval. Additionally, the president now has significant authority over the economy, including the ability to issue executive orders and direct regulatory agencies.

Given these changes, the Federalists would likely support the modern-day Executive Branch and its expanded powers. They would argue that a strong executive is necessary to protect American interests and ensure stability in a complex world. The Anti-Federalists, however, would likely be wary of the modern-day Executive Branch and its potential for abuse. They would argue that the expanded powers of the presidency undermine the separation of powers and increase the risk of tyranny.

One key legal case that highlights the debate over the powers of the Executive Branch is Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952). In this case, President Truman attempted to seize control of steel mills during the Korean War in order to prevent a labor strike. The Supreme Court ruled that the president did not have the authority to take such action without Congressional approval, citing the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution. This decision supports the Anti-Federalist view that the president's powers should be limited and subject to checks and balances.

Enjoy!

The social circumstances surrounding the year 2005 varied across different parts of the world. Here are some of the significant events and trends that influenced social circumstances during that year:

Hurricane Katrina: In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast of the United States, causing significant damage and displacement of people. The disaster exposed inequalities in the social, economic, and racial makeup of the affected areas.

War in Iraq: In 2005, the United States and its allies were engaged in a war with Iraq, which began in 2003. The war caused significant loss of life and displacement, both in Iraq and among military personnel and their families.

Globalization: The year 2005 was marked by increasing globalization, with the growth of international trade and the spread of digital technology connecting people around the world. This had both positive and negative effects on social circumstances, with some people benefiting from increased economic opportunities and others feeling left behind.

Terrorism: The threat of terrorism continued to shape social circumstances in many parts of the world in 2005. The London bombings in July of that year, for example, highlighted the ongoing threat of extremist violence.

Social and political movements: 2005 was marked by several social and political movements, including protests against the Iraq War, advocacy for environmental sustainability, and calls for greater social justice and equality.

Overall, the social circumstances of 2005 were complex and varied, with a mix of positive and negative trends shaping the lives of people around the world.

The statement that is not one ongoing obstacle to peace between Israel and Palestinian Arabs is: B. Palestinians want to take back land that once belonged to their families.

The conflict between Israel and Palestine is primarily about the control of land, with both sides claiming the same territory as their homeland. The Palestinians want to establish their own independent state with East Jerusalem as its capital, and they demand the right of return for Palestinian refugees who were displaced from their homes during the creation of Israel in 1948.

On the other hand, Israel insists on maintaining its settlements in the West Bank, which the Palestinians consider to be their land, and opposes the right of return for Palestinian refugees, fearing that it would lead to the end of Israel as a Jewish state.

Therefore the correct option is B.

Learn more about Palestinian  here:https://brainly.com/question/30634690

#SPJ1

To fulfill the pillars of Islam, a Muslim would need to engage in all of the practices listed below

The Five Pillars of Islam are the basic acts of worship that are considered obligatory for all Muslims. They are:

Shahada: The declaration of faith, which involves affirming that there is no God but Allah, and that Muhammad is His messenger.

Salah: Performing the five daily prayers, which involves facing Mecca and reciting specific prayers at designated times throughout the day.

Zakat: Giving a portion of one's wealth to charity, which is considered a form of purification and a means of supporting those in need.

Sawm: Fasting during the month of Ramadan, which involves abstaining from food, drink, and other physical needs during daylight hours.

Hajj: Making a pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in a lifetime, which involves performing specific rituals at designated sites.

Learn more about Five Pillars of Islam at:

https://brainly.com/question/341909

#SPJ1

Answer: lincioln poin  of view is tyhart no mor sleavgery and 9its dooglous

Explanation:

reasd

give me blainleast

To do this activity, you need to understand the different perspectives of Palestinian and Israeli children's accounts in order to identify historical issues and problems to write about in your historical report.

It is necessary that you collect data and information from reliable sources that help in the development of your ideas, which must be organized in a logical and structured way through the introduction, development and conclusion

Some issues and historical problems that can be addressed in the reports of Palestinian and Israeli children can be related to religiosity, culture and conflicts that occurred in the country, and such themes are significant to address in their report.

Therefore, in this case, it is necessary that the analysis and interpretation of the evidence support the thesis statement, with a conclusion that reaffirms it and summarizes the key points of the report, through critical, analytical and unbiased thinking.

Find more about historical reporting at:

https://brainly.com/question/25670011

#SPJ1

Answer: The French Revolution became far more radical than the American Revolution. In addition to a period of extreme public violence, which became known as the Reign of Terror, the French Revolution also attempted to enhance the rights and power of poor people and women.

Explanation:His conclusion was that the forces of opposition in the aristocracy and the Old Regime in France were much greater than anything the Americans had had to overcome. In France everything had to be changed if reforms were to be introduced, hence “convulsions” were necessary and were to be expected.

Answer: The Industrial Revolution impacted different social classes of women in numerous ways.  Throughout this time period, the working class citizens were most significantly impacted.  Many women who did not belong to wealthy families would often be forced to enter the workforce just to provide enough for their families to live off of.  A woman named Mrs. Britton explains her journey through a testimony she gave looking back on her experience working during the Industrial Revolution in 1842.  From ages 10 to 26 Mrs. Britton worked in a factory in Calne.  Following her work in the factory, she would marry a working man of several occupations and have seven children with him.  Her husband would earn around 10s per week while working his jobs.  To provide for such a large family, Mrs. Britton was also forced to enter the workforce.  She and a few of her older children begin working in the fields and would harvest hay.  Her sons would make around 9s per day and she would make around 10s per day.  These were very small wages, even though 10s per day is above the average for a woman at this time.  Mrs. Britton would struggle between caring for the children while also holding down a full time job.  Although this lifestyle was very difficult for Mrs. Britton, she admits that she would much more prefer working in the field than working in the factory again.

Explanation:

During the age of imperialism, Darwin's ideas about evolution were read by his Arabic readers in various ways, often in relation to social and cultural issues. The reception of Darwin's ideas in the Arab world was complex and multifaceted, as different readers engaged with his works from different perspectives. The influence of the Islamic religious context on the first translations of Darwin's works into Arabic also played a significant role.

Relation to social and cultural issues:

a. Modernity and progress: Darwin's ideas were seen as a symbol of modernity and progress, as Arab societies were trying to catch up with the West. The theory of evolution represented scientific advancement, and embracing it was seen as a way to promote progress and development in the Arab world.

b. Nationalism and resistance: Some Arab intellectuals and political leaders used Darwin's ideas as a tool to resist colonial domination and to challenge the Western powers' claims of cultural superiority. They argued that Arabs were part of the same evolutionary process, and thus not inherently inferior to their European counterparts.

c. Social Darwinism: Darwin's ideas about evolution were sometimes misinterpreted or misused to justify certain social and political ideologies. For instance, Social Darwinism, which applied the concept of "survival of the fittest" to societies and nations, was sometimes used to justify racist and imperialist policies in the Arab world.

Influence of the Islamic religious context:

a. Compatibility with Islam: Some Muslim scholars and intellectuals argued that Darwin's ideas were compatible with Islamic teachings. They pointed to the Quranic verses that highlight the gradual development of life and suggested that evolution could be seen as part of God's plan. These scholars often provided their interpretations to reconcile the Islamic worldview with Darwin's theory.

b. Resistance and opposition: On the other hand, some conservative Muslim scholars strongly opposed Darwin's ideas, considering them a threat to the Islamic faith. They argued that the theory of evolution contradicted the Quranic account of creation, especially the creation of humans. This opposition led to heated debates and controversies in the Arab world.

c. Translation and dissemination: The Islamic religious context played a role in the translation of Darwin's works into Arabic. Translators often had to navigate the sensitive religious issues while rendering the texts, which sometimes led to alterations or omissions in the translations. Furthermore, the religious context influenced how Darwin's ideas were disseminated and discussed in the Arab world, shaping public opinion and debates surrounding the topic.

In conclusion, the reception of Darwin's ideas in the Arab world was closely tied to social and cultural issues in the age of imperialism, as well as influenced by the Islamic religious context. The complexity of this interaction led to diverse interpretations, applications, and responses to Darwin's theory of evolution in the Arab world.

Answer:

D.leaner

Explanation:

Mediated communication refers to communication carried out by the use of information communication technology

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Above average snowpack across the western United States and Canada, combined with a cooler and wetter than average spring have contributed to the highest water levels the Columbia River has seen in 15 years.