Answer:
The Amistad case was complex for several reasons:
Legal Status of the Mende: The Amistad case involved the legal status of a group of Africans who had been kidnapped and sold into slavery. The Mende, as they were known, had rebelled against their captors and had taken control of the Spanish slave ship, La Amistad. The question of whether the Mende were free or slaves was a central issue in the case.
International Law: The Amistad case involved complex issues of international law. The ship had been intercepted by a United States naval vessel off the coast of Long Island, but the ship and its occupants were Spanish property. The Spanish government argued that the United States had no right to interfere with Spanish property or to try the case in a U.S. court.
Slavery and Abolition: The Amistad case took place in the context of a growing abolitionist movement in the United States. Abolitionists saw the case as an opportunity to challenge the institution of slavery and to promote the cause of human rights. The case was widely publicized and generated considerable controversy and debate.
Language Barrier: The Mende spoke Mende, not English or Spanish, which complicated communication during the trial. The case relied on interpreters, and there were discrepancies between the translations provided by different interpreters.
All of these factors contributed to the complexity of the Amistad case. In the end, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Mende, declaring them free and ordering their return to Africa. The case became an important landmark in the struggle for abolition and for human rights.
The Amistad case was complex for a number of reasons, including legal status of the Africans, the involvement of the United States government, international implications, and the political climate.
The legal status of the Africans. The Africans were technically slaves, but they had been illegally enslaved. They argued that they had a right to self-defense and that they had been justified in taking control of the Amistad.
The involvement of the United States government. The United States government was initially sympathetic to the Africans' cause, but President Martin Van Buren eventually sided with Spain. This put the government in an awkward position, as it was supporting the return of the Africans to slavery.
The international implications. The Amistad case had international implications, as it involved the laws of two countries, Spain and the United States. It also raised the question of whether the international slave trade was still legal.
The political climate. The Amistad case took place in the midst of a growing debate over slavery in the United States. The case became a rallying cry for abolitionists, who saw it as a test of the country's commitment to the ideals of freedom and justice.
In the end, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Africans, and they were allowed to return to their homeland. The Amistad case was a landmark victory for the abolitionist movement, and it helped to raise awareness of the evils of slavery.
To know more about slavery:
https://brainly.com/question/9030828
#SPJ6
How did European countries interact with their African colonies after World
War I?
OA. They relied more heavily on African colonies to provide resources
to help Europe rebuild.
B. They offered independence to any African colony that agreed to
provide Europe with free laborers.
OC. They ignored African colonies and focused entirely on preventing
another European war.
OD. They started conflicts between African colonies to test new
weapons and equipment.
European countries interact with their African colonies after World War I: They relied more heavily on African colonies to provide resources to help Europe rebuild.
After World War I, European nations connected with their colonies in Africa by largely depending on those colonies to offer resources to aid in their reconstruction.
These are materials that are naturally occurring and improve the standard of living. European nations dealt with their colonies in Africa by significantly depending on them to offer resources to aid in their reconstruction.
Learn more about World War I here:
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
Which of the following was the only empire to survive World War I?
O British I
O Germany
O Ottoman
O Russia
Roosevelt's attempt to "pack" the Supreme Court proved extremely costly to FDR and to the New Deal because
a) the Court members he appointed still failed to support him and the New Deal
b) Congress began proceedings to impeach FDR so his momentum decreased
c) in an age of dictators, it made him seem like he was willing to violate separation of powers to become powerful
d) After his failed attempt, the Supreme Court declared many of his New Deal programs unconstitutional.
which of the following was not one of the results of the civil war? (lesson 5.02) question 23 options: the union was saved. women began demanding a greater political voice. the slaves were emancipated. plantations began running more smoothly.
D. plantation began running more smoothly
The uniin was saved, the slaves were emancipated, and the women did begin to demand a greater political voice.
True or false
In 1804, Napoleon Bonaparte made himself the (president) of France.
Answer:
False. In 1804, Napoleon Bonaparte declared himself the Emperor of France, not the president.
Explanation:
What does this cartoon suggest about the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918?
Political cartoons from the time period of the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918 often reflected the fear, confusion, and social upheaval caused by the outbreak.
Numerous cartoons portrayed the flu as a important and changeable force that was inviting society. They frequently depicted people wearing masks, quarantined in their homes, or fleeing from the contagion in fear. Some cartoons also blamed government officers and medical authorities for their running of the outbreak, suggesting that they were ill- set or ineffective in their response.
Overall, the cartoons of the Spanish flu epidemic suggest that the outbreak had a profound impact on society and that it was a source of fear and query for numerous people. They also reflect the ways in which the epidemic disintegrated everyday life and challenged the authority of governments and medical experts to cover public health.
Learn more about Spanish flu at
https://brainly.com/question/31635072
#SPJ4
How are the social conditions of the 19th century different to pre-revolutionary France?
In situations where the President is suspected of
wrongdoing, such as the Watergate scandal, the
official role of the House of Representatives is to?
The official role of the House of Representatives is to investigate the issue
What does the House of Representatives do when the president does wrong?The House of Representatives plays a critical role in delicate matters wherein the President is alleged to have committed a transgression or misdeed, such as the Watergate scandal.
The representatives can initiate an impeachment proceeding against the executive in order to commence the formal process of removing them from their respective posts. Upon the chamber voting in favor of implementing the measures of impeachment, the case is referred to the Senate who, after conducting their extensive trial, can prosecute and officiate the expulsion of the already impeached incumbent.
Read morte on House of Representatives here:https://brainly.com/question/25965873
#SPJ1
How did Theodore Roosevelt’s Corollary influence US foreign policy?
A.
It showed that the United States was becoming more passive internationally.
B.
It highlighted how the United States needed to work within the United Nations.
C.
It proposed that all nations have stronger diplomatic relations with one another.
D.
It displayed how the United States would take a more aggressive role in the world.
E.
It presented a direct threat to the Soviet Union for any action taken in Europe
It displayed how the United States would take a more aggressive role in the world influence US foreign policy.
Option D is correct
This policy displayed how the United States would take a more aggressive role in the world, asserting its dominance in the Western Hemisphere and projecting its power beyond its borders. The Corollary was a departure from previous US foreign policy, which had largely been focused on isolationism and non-intervention.
Roosevelt's policy set the stage for future US interventions in Latin America and helped to establish the US as a dominant global power.
Option D is correct
To know more about US foreign policy here
https://brainly.com/question/29628542
#SPJ1
in the 1960s, the bureau of narcotics and dangerous drugs faced widespread disregard of drug laws by large numbers of young people who
In the 1960s, the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) faced widespread disregard of drug laws by large numbers of young people who were part of the counterculture movement. This movement often promoted drug use as a means of personal expression and rebellion against societal norms.
The BNDD had to address these challenges and enforce drug laws to prevent the spread of drug abuse and protect public health. They did this by conducting investigations, arresting those involved in drug trafficking, and collaborating with other agencies to develop comprehensive drug enforcement strategies.
What is bureau of narcotics and dangerous drugs?
A division of the US Department of Justice (DOJ), the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) served as the forerunner of the current Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).
To know more about Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD):
https://brainly.com/question/21634898
#SPJ11
From what you have learned about the u. S. Reaction to the irish diaspora, what similar effects do you think australia and canada faced between 1841 and 1850? do you think that there were any differences in how these countries reacted? if so, why? if not, why not? your answer should be at least 150 words in length
The Irish diaspora had a significant impact on many countries, including the United States, Canada, and Australia, during the mid-19th century.
In the United States, the affluence of Irish emigrants was met with hostility and demarcation, particularly in the northeastern metropolises where numerous settled. The Irish were seen as a trouble to American culture and society, and were frequently portrayed as violent, and uninstructed. They faced significant walls to employment, casing, and political participation.
Canada and Australia also endured an affluence of Irish emigrants during this period, but the responses were kindly different. In Canada, the Irish were originally viewed with dubitation, but as they began to assimilate and contribute to the country's frugality and culture, they were ultimately accepted and ate . In Australia, the Irish faced analogous demarcation and hostility as they did in the United States, but there were also sweats to integrate them into Australian society and culture.
Learn more about irish diaspora at
https://brainly.com/question/3767364
#SPJ4
Which empire collapsed and gave way to independent nations in the Balkan region?
Answer:
The Ottoman Empire
Explanation:
Balkan people were under the rule of the Ottoman Empire for centuries. Many nations gained independence before the collapse of the empire however. Certain rebellions resulted in new balkan states forming and the First Balkan War helped these nations gain territory and consolidate their rule. If you refer to the limited occupation of the Nazi Regime in WW2 that is a different case but I believe the answer is the The Ottoman Empire due to the way the question was asked.
Why was the Battle of Saratoga in September 1777 considered a decisive military victory for the patriot cause?
Answer:
The American defeat of the superior British army lifted patriot morale, furthered the hope for independence, and helped to secure the foreign support needed to win the war.
Explanation:
The Battle of Saratoga was a turning point during the Revolutionary war.
Answer:
The Battle of Saratoga in September 1777 was considered a decisive military victory for the patriot cause because it was the first major defeat of a British army in the war and it convinced France to enter the war as an ally of the United States. The British general John Burgoyne had planned to march from Canada to Albany, New York, and join forces with other British troops to isolate and crush the New England colonies. However, he faced strong resistance from the Continental Army led by Horatio Gates and Benedict Arnold, as well as local militia and sharpshooters. In two battles fought near Saratoga, Burgoyne lost many of his men and was forced to surrender his entire army of over 6,000 soldiers on October 17. This stunning victory boosted the morale of the Americans and impressed the French, who had been secretly aiding the rebels since 1776. The French decided to openly support the American cause by signing a treaty of alliance in February 1778 and sending troops, ships, and supplies to help fight the British. The Battle of Saratoga thus turned the tide of the war in favor of the Americans and paved the way for their eventual independence.
Explanation:
Based on the cartoon, what course of action do you think the cartoonist would favor?
David Low (1891-1963) was a political cartoonist who gained international acclaim for his satirical and often controversial cartoons.
He was born in New Zealand and began his career as a cartoonist for colorful journals in his home country before moving to Australia and also the UK. Low's cartoons dived a range of political and social issues, and he frequently targeted high- profile numbers similar as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Winston Churchill. He was particularly known for his caricatures, which exaggerated the features and erraticisms of his subjects to produce a sarcastic effect.
During World War II, Low's cartoons were extensively circulated and helped to boost morale in Britain. He was knighted in 1962 in recognition of his benefactions to political cartooning. moment, he's flashed back as one of the most influential political cartoonists of the 20th century.
Learn more about cartoonist at
https://brainly.com/question/11995241
#SPJ4
The figure is given in the attachment:
what did harriet elizabeth and william u6.2 the people on this list are similar because their actions - question 7 options: promoted support for westward expansion showed dedication to sectionalism and states' rights promoted interest in agricultural innovation showed commitment to rights and freedoms
Harriet, Elizabeth, and William are all similar in that their actions promoted support for westward expansion. This means that they were in favor of the idea of pushing the boundaries of the United States further west, which was a popular idea in the 19th century. This was seen as a way to expand the country's resources and opportunities, as well as to spread American values and beliefs.
Their support for westward expansion also ties into their dedication to sectionalism and states' rights. Sectionalism refers to the idea that different regions of the country have different interests and needs, and that these should be taken into account when making decisions about the country as a whole. States' rights, on the other hand, is the idea that individual states should have more power and autonomy than the federal government.
These ideas were closely tied to westward expansion, as the new territories that were being opened up were often seen as opportunities for individual states to expand their power and influence.
Finally, their actions also promoted interest in agricultural innovation. As the country expanded westward, there was a growing need for new agricultural techniques and technologies that could help farmers to grow crops in new and challenging environments. Harriet, Elizabeth, and William were all advocates for new agricultural methods, and their work helped to promote innovation in this important area.
Overall, the actions of Harriet, Elizabeth, and William show a commitment to promoting the growth and development of the United States, as well as a dedication to the values of sectionalism, states' rights, and agricultural innovation. Their work helped to shape the country in important ways, and their legacies continue to be felt today.
To learn more about westward expansion refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29774506
#SPJ11
The skate shop owner wants 30 percent of each order to incude longboards. He wants to know how many longboards to order out of a total of 50 skateboards.
Answer:
If the skate shop owner wants 30 percent of each order to include longboards, then he should order 15 longboards out of the total of 50 skateboards. This will ensure that his inventory meets the demand for longboards while still offering a variety of skateboards to his customers.
Explanation:
Help with both questions
As a leader in the German government (the Weimar Republic), should I sign the treaty of Versailles obliging us to pay an astounding $33 billion in reparations, reduce our military, and suffer a loss of territories, my initial emotional reaction would be one of disappointment and frustration.
How I would feel about the repatriationsIt would be understood that we were held responsible for the war, but it could not be denied that the conditions of the treaty imposed were abnormally severe and unjustified. Consequently, pressure from the people of Germany to stand against the terms of the treaty and strive for more equity in settlements could be expected.
Nevertheless, cognizant of our weakened position and with the intention of escaping punishment or further hostilities from other countries, precautionary measures are required in order for Germany to safeguard its independence and autonomy. Urgently focusing on rehabilitating the economy as well as reviving the military to full strength would be a focal point so as to achieve this purpose whilst also attempting to mend diplomatic relationships with global nations.
The fallout Austria-Hungary encountered by signing the accords was extensive:
- Alsace-Lorraine and certain eastern/western frontiers were conceded away - Achieving a maximum of one hundred thousand soldiers; prohibiting them to use submarines, tanks, and aircrafts- Repaying $33 billion in indemnities to the Allied forces which had negative ramifications on the economic stability and brought hyperinflation to the region at the start of the 1920’s- The War Guilt Clause acknowledged the blame wholly resting on Germany and her allies and necessitating their agreement to each clause in the Treaty of Versailles.Read more on treaty of Versailles here;https://brainly.com/question/1351074
#SPJ1
How far does the strength of anti-war feeling among the British explain why Chamberlain persisted with the policy of appeasement?
Answer:
The strength of anti-war feeling among the British played a significant role in Chamberlain's decision to pursue a policy of appeasement with Nazi Germany. The traumatic experience of World War I, which had ended just over twenty years earlier, had left a lasting impact on British society, with many people being deeply averse to the prospect of another conflict. This sentiment was particularly strong among politicians and the general public, who feared the devastating human and economic costs of another war.
Chamberlain believed that the policy of appeasement offered a way to avoid war and achieve peace with Germany, which he saw as a reasonable goal. He believed that by making concessions to Hitler, he could satisfy the Germans' legitimate grievances and prevent further aggression. This approach was popular with many British people who were tired of war and looking for a way to avoid another conflict.
However, Chamberlain's policy of appeasement was ultimately unsuccessful in preventing war. Hitler continued to pursue his expansionist ambitions, and the concessions made by Chamberlain only emboldened him to demand more. The failure of the appeasement policy was a significant factor in Chamberlain's political downfall and ultimately led to his replacement as Prime Minister by Winston Churchill, who took a more aggressive stance towards Nazi Germany.
Explanation:
which of the following plans provided $400 million to greece and turkey after WWII in 1947?
Explanation:
The correct answer is the Marshall Plan.
The Marshall Plan, also known as the European Recovery Program, was a US initiative launched in 1947 that provided economic assistance to Western European countries after the devastation of World War II. The plan was named after Secretary of State George C. Marshall, who announced the program in a speech at Harvard University. The plan provided aid to countries including Greece and Turkey to help rebuild their economies and prevent the spread of communism in the region. The total aid provided by the Marshall Plan was approximately $13 billion, with $400 million specifically allocated to Greece and Turkey.
Answer:
Explanation:
it's truman doctrine look at the comment that i said at the top of the person it will show you why its truman doctrine!!! :)
During the years leading up to World War I, Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany sought to expand his country's navy to compete with that of Great Britain. This suggests that Germany was most likely pursuing a policy of
From 15 June 1888 until his abdication on 9 November 1918, Wilhelm II, often known as William II, was the last German emperor and king of Prussia.
On November 9, 1918, Kaiser Wilhelm II was compelled to relinquish his throne and leave Germany for Holland after losing the support of the military and a domestic revolution. A left-leaning Social Democratic Party leader named Friedrich Ebert became the head of state.
One of the most well-known public characters of World War I (1914–18) was Wilhelm II (1859–1941), the German Kaiser (emperor) and monarch of Prussia from 1888 to 1918.
Learn more about Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany here:
https://brainly.com/question/1259394
#SPJ1
What happened after the Chinese Exclusion Act was passed?
After the Chinese Exclusion Act was passed in 1882, Chinese immigration to the United States was significantly reduced, and those already in the country faced discrimination and limited opportunities.
The Chinese Exclusion Act was the first law in U.S. history to exclude a specific ethnic group from immigrating to the country. It was enacted due to anti-Chinese sentiment and the belief that Chinese immigrants were taking jobs away from U.S. citizens.
The Act suspended Chinese immigration for ten years and made Chinese immigrants ineligible for naturalization. As a result, the Chinese community in the United States became more isolated, as they could not reunite with their families in China or bring new immigrants to the country. Additionally, Chinese people already in the United States experienced widespread discrimination, were often forced to live in segregated neighborhoods, and had limited job opportunities.
The Chinese Exclusion Act had lasting negative effects on the Chinese community in the United States, leading to reduced immigration, isolation, and discrimination against Chinese people living in the country. It remained in effect until 1943, when it was repealed during World War II as a gesture of goodwill towards China, which was an ally at the time.
For more information on Chinese Exclusion Act kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/513896
#SPJ11
What might one say for the third LEQ for last year? "Evaluate the extent to which international conflicts in the period from 1898-1930 affected the role of the US in the world?" Iâd obviously write about WWI, but what else?
The third LEQ for last year asked to evaluate the impact of international conflicts between 1898 and 1930 on the role of the United States in the world. While World War I is an obvious choice to discuss in this essay, there were other significant international conflicts that affected the role of the US during this time period.
One such conflict was the Spanish-American War of 1898, which saw the US emerge as a global power for the first time. The US acquired colonies such as Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines, which extended its influence beyond the Western Hemisphere.
Another conflict that impacted the role of the US was the Boxer Rebellion in China in 1900. The US was part of an international coalition that intervened to suppress the rebellion and protect foreign interests in China. This led to increased US involvement in China and the establishment of the "Open Door Policy" that allowed US businesses to access Chinese markets.
Finally, the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 had implications for the US's role in the world. President Theodore Roosevelt played a key role in negotiating a peace treaty between the two powers, for which he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. This established the US as a mediator and peacemaker on the global stage.
Overall, these international conflicts, along with World War I, had a significant impact on the role of the US in the world between 1898 and 1930. It would be important to discuss each of these conflicts in depth and analyze their specific effects on the US's role in the world.
To know more international conflicts refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29774093
#SPJ11
How did british leaders respond when the american colonist refused to obey great britans new laws
Answer:
They were very angry and ordered British troops to America in case they tried to revolt. They also added more taxes and laws that escalated the conflict to the Boston massacre and the Boston Tea Party. Then to the Revolutionary War.
The purpose of the Missouri Treasurer is to
The main purpose of Missouri Treasurer is to manage the state's finances and invest taxpayer dollars.
What are the responsibilities of the Missouri Treasurer?The Treasurer is most responsible for managing the state finances and ensuring that taxpayer money are invested in a responsible and transparent manner and also oversees a variety of programs and initiatives.
One of its program allows individuals with disabilities to save for their future expenses. He also serves as a member of several state boards and commissions such as the Missouri Housing Development Commission and the Missouri State Employees' Retirement System.
Read more about Missouri Treasurer
brainly.com/question/29790736
#SPJ1
What role did Radical Republicans play during Reconstruction?
During Reconstruction, the Radicals persisted in creating widespread institutional change by pressuring for passage of Constitutional amendments.
What happened in the Reconstruction era?During the post-Civil War era of Reconstruction (1865 to 1877), a group within the Republican Party, known as the Radical Republicans, played an instrumental role in dictating policies and outcomes. The faction's primary objective was to secure civil rights, combined with equal treatment towards black individuals who had been previously emancipated via the Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th Amendment.
Notable figures leading this ideological shift included Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner. With aims towards promoting racial equality and safeguarding political entitlements for former slaves, their strategies encompassed implementing aggressive, transformative measures that dismantled social, economic, and political structures correlative to slavery inculcation.
Learn more about reconstruction at
https://brainly.com/question/13753522
#SPJ1
How might a drought create an environment that allowed the other three theories to develop? WARFARE DISEASE FAMINE
Drought can foster an environment that stimulates the emergence of three other potential theories in several ways:
What will be the effect of droughtWarfare: Water and food are scarce resources drought leads to conflicts about. Communities resort to raiding or committing acts of violence to ensure survival when crops wither away, and animals pass on due to deprivation of water. Drought can magnify extant tensions and set-off real wars in certain instances.
Disease: When drought occurs, the heated atmosphere encourages disease outbreak! Depleted water sources force people to consume polluted drinking water which leads to spreading waterborne infections like cholera. Also, malnourishment formulates weak immunity making people susceptible to a multitude of diseases.
Famine: The effects of insufficient rainfall entail crop marasmus and dwindling counts of livestock—the consequence is scarcity of food leading inevitably to famine circumstances sometimes even causing death from starvation and malnutrition in extreme conditions.
Read more on drought here:https://brainly.com/question/12686086
#SPJ1
Why did Luther refuse to take back what he had written about the Church?
Answer:
Luther refused to take back what he had written about the Church because he believed that his ideas were based on the Bible and that the Church's teachings were corrupt and in need of reform. He also believed that he had a duty to speak out against what he saw as wrongdoing within the Church.
Explanation:
Which of the following describe American ideological ideas, and which reflect the realities of American society?
Ideals:
-political and legal equality for all
-political authority from the consent of the governed
-religious toleration and freedom of thought
Realities:
-slavery
-Indians ceded more land to white settlers
-married women had virtually no rights at all
The statement "married women had virtually no rights at all" reflects the realities of American society, particularly in the 18th and 19th centuries. During this time, the legal concept of coverture was prevalent in the United States. Under coverture, a married woman's legal rights and property were subsumed by her husband, and she was not allowed to own property, sign contracts, or make decisions independently.
However, this reality did not align with the American ideological ideas of freedom, equality, and individual rights. The Declaration of Independence, for example, proclaimed the belief that "all men are created equal" and endowed with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Although the wording of the document did not explicitly include women, the underlying principles can be seen as promoting equal rights for all individuals, regardless of gender.
Despite the prevalence of coverture in American society, women gradually fought for and gained more rights throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. The women's suffrage movement, which culminated in the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920, granted women the right to vote. Additional progress was made in the areas of property rights, access to education, and employment opportunities.
In conclusion, the statement "married women had virtually no rights at all" reflects a historical reality in American society, where women faced significant legal and social restrictions. This reality was in contrast with the American ideological ideas of freedom, equality, and individual rights. Over time, women's rights advocates worked to bridge the gap between ideology and reality, leading to greater gender equality in the United States.
To learn more about woman's legal rights refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14208474
#SPJ11
Why does Mao think struggle is necessary for the development of Marxism?
Mao Zedong established a form of Marxism-Leninism known as Maoism, which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) refers to as Mao Zedong Thought, in order to bring about a socialist revolution in the rural, pre-industrial society of the Republic of China and subsequently the People's Republic of China.
Every class conflict, according to Marx, is a political conflict. This implies that if the proletariat and capitalists are engaged in an economic conflict today, they will be forced to engage in political conflict tomorrow in order to defend their respective class interests in a conflict with dual manifestations.
According to Marxism, the conflict between the bourgeoisie, or capitalists, and the proletariat, or workers, defines economic relations in a capitalist system and will eventually result in a communist society.
Learn more about Marxism visit: brainly.com/question/29544281
#SPJ4
Why is in incorrect to explain a cultural feature by saying it is "traditional"?